LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-10-2007, 06:32 PM   #21
zoneouddy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by lord of the mark
nowhere in the post are gas price controls called for.

Commenters on political sites are often buffoons.

Well, MRT sometimes does not have the greatest reading comprehension ability.
zoneouddy is offline


Old 05-10-2007, 07:08 PM   #22
6Rexw51X

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by lord of the mark
I mean its not like having an investigation of the industry structure and competitive behavior is manifestly absurd. True. But I wish the proponents of such an investigation would familiarize themselves with

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION

THIS INVESTIGATION
or even

THIS INVESTIGATION

before calling for YET ANOTHER investigation.

edit: because I can't find the ] key.
6Rexw51X is offline


Old 05-10-2007, 10:52 PM   #23
Gooracouppy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
MtG makes a good point and I think the solution is for the government to correct the 'market failure' here as thats clearly a contributing to a high gas price.

They simply need to change the factors which are causing the market to supply too few refineries, the simplest solution seems to me to be to set up a tax structure in which the companies either build refineries and supply gasoline at low markup or else they see their windfall profits taxed away. At the same time government needs to act as a neutral mediator between companies to negotiate and plan nation wide capacity increases in such a way that the market remains on an even keel, neither suffering from a glut or shortage.

And of course at the same time we need to be weening our society off Oil in general to cushion the increasingly severe shortages were beginning to face.
Gooracouppy is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:24 AM   #24
MineOffedOvex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Oerdin
It does seem like we need to do something to introduce more competition to the oil refining and distribution business. We need more refineries owned and controlled by different companies and those refineries need to be able to distribute their gas through independent chains of gas stations instead of via major brand stations owned (or effectively controlled by) big oil.

How do we get more refineries and independents? That's the hard part. New companies would have a devil of a time getting insurance for their new refineries due to their lack of a track record while if foreign oil companies came in they'd still face the NIMBY crowd. One thing is sure and that is the market doesn't seem to be working efficiently on this aspect; prices are currently sky high and refiners are making record profits but we're not seeing any new entrances to the refining business like we're taught in Econ 101. The high profits are supposed to attract new investment but US refining capacity continues to go down and has been for decades. What gives? What's the barrier to new players entering the field? GODDAMNIT, READ THE ENTIRE THREAD!
MineOffedOvex is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:32 AM   #25
Tauntenue

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
there is no one good running
i can't vote anyway tho.
Tauntenue is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:33 AM   #26
flowersnewacq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
337
Senior Member
Default
BTW one of the reasons Democrats like to take pot shots at the oil industry is because most of the oil PAC money goes to Republicans therefor the hacks believe they have nothing to lose by appealing to populist sentiments. It never seems to help the hacks but it's a generic feel good piece of filler material for party web sites like the one linked in the OP. If people were serious about gas prices then they'd try doing a combination of decreasing demand (via higher CAFE requirements) and increasing production (by making it easier to build new refineries). We've also seen a lot of consolidation in the refining business and most of the independents are now gone as the majors have snapped them up. If we're serious about decreasing prices then we also have to be serious about introducing new competition by either building new independently owned refineries or forcing the existing players to not hold such dominate roles.

A second issue is although nation wide the US has a fair number of refining companies each companies has a pretty set geographic range and there is very little overlap between the various players. Rather then letting companies get localized monopolies, where most of the refining capacity in a region is controlled by one company, we should be forcing them to trade refineries in different regions so that each region has at least two major refining competitors.
flowersnewacq is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:36 AM   #27
Dndjzirw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by b etor

why would i waste my duty to vote? there arent any options you agree with?
Dndjzirw is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:47 AM   #28
Dreaming

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by MRT144
when does adding capacity ever benefit anyone in the business? Exactly, they have no incentive to increase refining capacity (complaining about environmental regulations and NIMBYism is just for PR, so people think Big Oil wants to increase capacity even though they don't) because it would cause prices to fall and thus hurt profits.

The whole industry is a f*cking cabal taking advantage of the fact that the demand for oil is inelastic, nationalize it.
Dreaming is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 12:50 AM   #29
HakSpeame

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default
write-in! b etor!!
HakSpeame is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 01:37 AM   #30
Anavaralo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
a bunch of people vote for Donald Duck even tho he's too old. i think i have a good shot at winning.
Anavaralo is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 02:04 AM   #31
domeffire

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Well, I'm a moderate, and generally agree with about 50% of both parties' platforms.

However, both the Repubs and the Dems have been spouting so much rubbish lately that I'm not sure who I'd vote for.
domeffire is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 02:27 AM   #32
Affolfembonge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
Affolfembonge is offline


Old 05-11-2007, 04:14 AM   #33
Mereebirl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
You ageist scum!
Mereebirl is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity