LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-25-2012, 06:12 AM   #1
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default tranlienianum legal?
Does anyone know if Paph tranlienianum is legal in the USA? Or have a link to the source document? Either Google is mute or I can't structure a correct search for the current (2012) info. sigh. Its hell getting old.
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:50 AM   #2
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
not sure if its legal but its ugly lol
aAaBecker is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 09:37 AM   #3
cheesypeetyz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
cheesypeetyz is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 02:59 PM   #4
MexicoCity

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
i like it too, at least in photos
but people, well, that depends....

i kinda sorta think they can be, depending on the source
hengduanbiotech.com has them (but the website isn't working now) and i think all their Paphs are legal here, when imported through them, but i could easily be wrong
MexicoCity is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 05:29 PM   #5
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
aAaBecker is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 06:03 PM   #6
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 06:12 PM   #7
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Last I heard Chia Hua Dancer and the other gigantifolium hybrids were still illegal,but you can get that anywhere and no one says anything.I doubt anyone will come kicking in your door for one plant.
aAaBecker is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 06:46 PM   #8
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:14 PM   #9
MexicoCity

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
MexicoCity is offline


Old 02-26-2012, 01:56 AM   #10
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
aAaBecker is offline


Old 02-26-2012, 06:38 AM   #11
Ferkilort

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
Ferkilort is offline


Old 02-26-2012, 06:44 AM   #12
houkbsdov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
Tranlienum not legal, hangianum not legal, vietnamense only legal from Antec, etc... unless the government believes that these plants are found in China. I had this conversation with Kerry Richards a long time ago bout plants he had with paperwork from a regional Vietnamese CITES office but the central Vietnam office said that no paperwork was given from them; therefore the US govt seized the plants.
houkbsdov is offline


Old 02-26-2012, 06:35 PM   #13
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Thanks everyone. I thought it might be the case that a paper trail was still necessary.
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 02-26-2012, 09:31 PM   #14
Arrocousa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
Arrocousa is offline


Old 02-27-2012, 04:18 AM   #15
houkbsdov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
And how did these plants get into China? Did the Peoples' Glorious Democrtic Army move the borders again?!
houkbsdov is offline


Old 02-27-2012, 06:14 PM   #16
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 02-27-2012, 08:51 PM   #17
LOVEBoy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
From my conversations with Averynov while driving him from airport (Chicago) to Milwaukee and back (this means I had two 90 minute conversations with Leonid, he is very pleasant to talk with)

Leonid Averynov does not feel the occurances of various Vietnamese paphs in and around Malipo, China are natural. He feels these populations have been seeded or transplanted. Then after these transplanted plants have settled in and looked natural, they were pointed out to botany and agriculture students doing graduate work from the various Chinese universities. The articles published by the young, eager and less than cynical students then serve as 'proof' that these are Chinese species and therefore legal to export under Chinese CITES documentation.

However, science as such never limits itself to a single authority, so as long as one or another authority disagrees, there is the claim that these species are indeed Chinese in origin.

As a hobby grower I am glad that there is an odd 'disjunct' aggregation of the finest of the Vietnamese species in the hills around the town of Malipo, China as it means in the USA there is a chance I can get a few documented as being acquired legally plants. The documentation by Chinese graduate students as 'real', of these outlier populations, does screw up conservation efforts. In that some species appear in less need of protection than they really are.

Malipo for centuries was a town that specialized in trading medicinal and culinary herbs and spices into China from Vietnam and all points south and west from there. In more modern times it has a large flower market that specializes in selling seasonal flowers to the Chinese markets. The practice of planting medicinal plants into the forests on the hills around Malipo is a practice used for generations to try and increase supply of plants needed for market. Dr Averynov has good reason to be skeptical of the claim that these disjunct populations are legitimate. On the other hand, a USFWS official really can't argue that articles published by Chinese universities are false just because they have an anecdotal objection from one scientist. Understandably the Chinese government is touchy when you tell them their universities are not doing good research. USFWS has to go along with the Chinese government

So the saga goes on. It will be interesting to see if all of a sudden, several years from now, the USFWS will suddenly go back and try to seize plants from US nurseries who in good faith tried to legally import these horticulturally desirable species.
LOVEBoy is offline


Old 02-28-2012, 12:53 AM   #18
houkbsdov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
Quote:
houkbsdov is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 10:36 PM   #19
Snocioncilm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Holger Perner's plants are grown in vitro in his lab and he has CITES permits for those brought into the US.
Snocioncilm is offline


Old 01-04-2012, 05:08 AM   #20
houkbsdov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
This is so silly. If vietnam did not, as they insist, issue permits for "vietnamese" plants then how could they be legal!
houkbsdov is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity