LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-07-2012, 02:51 PM   #1
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default Canada cuts diplomatic relations with Iran!
http://m.wistv.com/autojuice?targetU...mbassy-in-iran
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 02:54 PM   #2
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
Just 16 hours earlier, this news came out.
Bnai Brith Canada calls on Canadian senator to cut all ties with Iran:

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/49335
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 03:16 PM   #3
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
On the 9th of August Gatestone institute called on Canada to close the Iranian embassy in Ottawa:
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/32...embassy-canada

Does anyone know whether Gatestone institute has some Zionist connections. It sounds familiar anyway!
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 03:49 PM   #4
Mangoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
found this, Neuro...

some of the names listed have a certain "ring" to them...

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profi...tone_institute

Gatestone Institute

[COLOR=#898989 !important]last updated: August 19, 2012[/COLOR]




Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.
The Gatestone Institute is a New York-based advocacy organization that is tied to neoconservative and other right-wing networks in the United States.[1] Gatestone’s website describes the institute as “a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank [that] is dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report.” It cites the following core subject areas: “Institutions of Democracy and the Rule of Law; Human Rights; A free and strong economy; A military capable of ensuring peace at home and in the free world; Energy independence; Ensuring the public stay informed of threats to our individual liberty, sovereignty and free speech.”[2]
According to one account, the institute was founded sometime around 2011 byNina Rosenwald, an heiress of the Sears Roebuck empire who has been a key philanthropic backer of anti-Muslim groups and individuals in the United States. Describing Gatestone’s origins, Max Blumenthal writes: “Through her affiliation with the Washington-based Hudson Institute, where Norman Podhoretz is an adjunct fellow, Rosenwald established a branch of the think tank in New York City. Operating under the Hudson banner, Rosenwald brought [the controversial anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders] to town in 2008 to warn against the Muslim plot to ‘rule the world by the sword.’ Wilders’s tirade during that visit against the prophet Muhammad, whom he described as ‘a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile,’ was strident even by the standards of the hawkish Hudson Institute. By 2011 … Rosenwald separated Hudson New York City from Hudson’s national branch, changing her organization’s name to the Gatestone Institute.”[3]
Among its activities, the institute holds what it calls “Briefing Council events,” which are “invitation only, exclusively for our members,” and require a minimum donation of $10,000.[4] Events in 2012 included a presentation by Wall Street Journaleditorial page editor Bret Stephens on the topic “Russia, China & Co.,” and a discussion on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees, which featured “pro-Israel” hardliners Daniel Pipes, Steven Rosen, andAnne Bayefsky.
Also in 2012, the institute hosted an additional presentation by Geert Wilders, during which he argued that “Islam is primarily a dangerous ideology rather than a religion. This is the truth. This violent ideology wants to impose Islamic Sharia law on the whole world, including us—the Kafirs, the non-Muslims…. Islam is the largest threat to freedom which the world is currently facing.”[5]
Gatestone regularly publishes articles and analyses on its website covering key issues of concern. During the 2012 election season, the institute ran several articles discussing the policy positions of leading candidates. In a November 2011 article, for instance, Gatestone contributor Andrew Bostom penned a piece titled “Romney vs. Gingrich on Jihad and Sharia A Yawning, if Unappreciated, Gap.” The article criticized the November 2011 GOP debate organized by CNN, theHeritage Foundation, and the American Enterprise Institute, which according to Bostom had failed to “highlight the yawning gap between [Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich] on the existential threat doctrine of our Islamic enemies: jihad and its motivational, sacralized religio-political ‘law,’ Sharia.”[6]
Bostom ridiculed Romney’s statement that “Jihadism is one of [the major threats to America], and that is not Islam,” calling it “a bizarre observation about the living Islamic institution of jihad.” By contrast, wrote Bostom, Gingrich has maintained “an irrefragably accurate, if blunt characterization of the existential threat posed by Islam's living, self-professed mission: to impose Sharia, its totalitarian religio-political ‘law,’ globally.” Bostom pointed to a July 2012 speech by Gingrich at the American Enterprise Institute, at which the former congressman said: “Sharia in its natural form has principles and punishments totally abhorrent to the Western world, and the underlying basic belief which is that law comes directly from God and is therefore imposed upon humans and no human can change the law without it being an act of apostasy is a fundamental violation of a tradition in the Western system which goes back to Rome, Athens, and Jerusalem and which has evolved in giving us freedom across the planet on a scale we can hardly imagine and which is now directly threatened by those who would impose it.”[7]
After Romney became the presumptive 2012 Republican presidential nominee, the Romney/Ryan campaign received a more favorable hearing from Gatestone contributors. In a July 2012 Gatestone publication, notorious “pro-Israel” hardliner Alan Dershowitz derided the argument that Romney should return campaign donations by one of his key financial backers, the controversial casino magnateSheldon Adelson, because Adelson’s fortune is connected to controversial foreign gambling businesses.[8]
As of mid-2012, the institute did not publicize information about its leadership or boards on its website. However, it did provide a list of “columnists,” as well as “senior editors,” “senior advisers,” and “distinguished senor fellows.” Columnists included several neoconservatives and other foreign policy hawks like Anne Bayefsky, Zuhdi Jasser, Kenneth Timmerman, former UN ambassador John Bolton, MEMRI president Yigal Carmon, Alan Dershowitz, Steven Emerson, former Pentagon official Doug Feith, neoconservative firebrand David Horowitz, Hudson Institute president Herbert London, the right-wing group NGO Monitor, Daniel Pipes, Emergency Committee for Israel spokesman Noah Pollak, former AIPACdirector Steven Rosen, American Enterprise Institute fellow Michael Rubin, Natan Sharansky, Foundation for Defense of Democracies fellow Lee Smith, and anti-Islamic writer Robert Spencer.[9] Former Pentagon official Harold Rhode was listed as a senior fellow.[10]
Mangoman is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 03:59 PM   #5
codecouponqw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default
This is how they represent themselves on their website:

Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank is dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report in promoting:
•Institutions of Democracy and the Rule of Law;
•Human Rights
•A free and strong economy
•A military capable of ensuring peace at home and in the free world
•Energy independence
•Ensuring the public stay informed of threats to our individual liberty, sovereignty and free speech.

But, reading through some of the articles, it seems to be one big giant joofest

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/about/
codecouponqw is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 05:23 PM   #6
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
That is more like Who's who in Jewry!

According to the above article in Gatestone Institute, the Iranian embassy had been involved in preparing for terrorist actions! I think it is safe to assume it is a complete fabrication, considering the people behind and contributing to Gatestone. But it is clear that Canada is totally in the hands of Zionist warmongers, and it is an ominous sign, that they close all diplomatic ties to Iran. I feel the war is close!
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 08:44 PM   #7
Olphander

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
621
Senior Member
Default
Canada's politicals nose is so far up israel's ass
when israel farts, Canadian politicians say thank you

fuck you harper

you're days are numbered too . . .
Olphander is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 09:40 PM   #8
Averti$ingGuru

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Canada's politicals nose is so far up israel's ass
when israel farts, Canadian politicians say thank you

fuck you harper
x 1000
Averti$ingGuru is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 11:00 PM   #9
Kdgjhytiy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
What I don't understand is....... why are they still in power with so many americans hating them......and the answer is......
because they control the poleticians that makes the rules and the money to those who makes the rules...... so easy when you know how it works.........
Kdgjhytiy is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 11:16 PM   #10
Larisochka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
345
Senior Member
Default



need to add another flag.
Larisochka is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 11:22 PM   #11
Pipindula

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Wonder if Iran not having a "central bank" has anything to do with it. Do TPTB think the deposed shah had a gold stash the elite are eyeballing? Wouldn't surprise me.
Pipindula is offline


Old 09-07-2012, 11:45 PM   #12
googlopharm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
Wonder if Iran not having a "central bank" has anything to do with it. Do TPTB think the deposed shah had a gold stash the elite are eyeballing? Wouldn't surprise me.
It has everything to do with it.

Edit: It's the same reason why we still have a trade embargo with Cuba.
googlopharm is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 12:28 AM   #13
Wvq9InTM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
The military don’t start wars. Politicians start wars.

General William Westmoreland


Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to the poor

Time will tell on their power minds
Making war just for fun
Treating people just like pawns in chess
Wait till their judgment day comes, yeah!

Black Sabbath
Wvq9InTM is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 10:43 AM   #14
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default



need to add another flag.
Isn't it the Canadian flag to the right?
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 11:55 AM   #15
Mangoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
Isn't it the Canadian flag to the right?
c'mon Neuro, be nice! lol

if anything it's more like the one on the left...

not sure if that's really better or worse though...lol
Mangoman is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 12:05 PM   #16
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
c'mon Neuro, be nice! lol

if anything it's more like the one on the left...

not sure if that's really better or worse though...lol
Thinking about it, it could be argued that all four are flags of Canada (incl. the star of David)... No need to apologize to any honest Canadians re this, cause an honest Canadian would agree to the assertion.
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 09-08-2012, 12:11 PM   #17
Mangoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
Thinking about it, it could be argued that all four are flags of Canada (incl. the star of David)... No need to apologize to any honest Canadians re this, cause an honest Canadian would agree to the assertion.
i do agree and need no apology.
its just after 8 am here and raining...still trying to shake the cobwebs loose...lol
Mangoman is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 04:02 AM   #18
pE71J5Sw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Israel controls Canada as much as America. Their (zionist) tentacles are everywhere...........
pE71J5Sw is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 04:31 AM   #19
GetsTan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
691
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure Jean Chrétien would be so much different.... it doesn't matter who we elect. We aren't as bad as the US [yet] but it is coming.

Canada's politicals nose is so far up israel's ass
when israel farts, Canadian politicians say thank you

fuck you harper

you're days are numbered too . . .
GetsTan is offline


Old 09-09-2012, 07:39 AM   #20
pE71J5Sw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure Jean Chrétien would be so much different.... it doesn't matter who we elect. We aren't as bad as the US [yet] but it is coming.
Whats Chretien got to do with it? We've always been under the control of the monarchy. Massive resource base, low population. The zionist nest egg of goodies. We are in the same boat as the states, eliminating manufacturing/refining. We've consented to the raping of all our natural resources to foreign corporations under the guise, "it'll be good for Canada and Canadians" sh*t line. We've been disarmed already (so I'd say the US has one up on us), Herr Harper is whittling away our rights and freedoms whilst building/upgrading prison systems throughout the country and introducing those great laws like mandatory minimums. NAFTA shows its ugly head with the cheap Mexican labour that come up and work our farms and such (just shipping the cheap labour where they need them whilst displacing jobs that Canadians could be doing). I could go on. Baird, Kenney and Mckay (hitler's henchmen) are a real sack of sh*t as well, but, thats another story. Btw, It "only appears" that Canada is doing better. We (central banking countries) all have our role to play. DHS is our new best friend (f*ck me). And remember, its the Central Bank of Canada (think FED's little brother)............
pE71J5Sw is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity