Another possibility is that they murdered him by suffocating him with a pillow, and then they made up the story that they forced him to have sex with all of them, and he stopped breathing...

Possible, but either way they are at fault.

Sure but the penalty would be different, if it was an accidental death while raping him, vs
murdering him while suffocating him w a pillow...

It's intent that seems to be lacking. Not to defend these women, but they just seem to have wanted the husband to live up to his husbandly duties.

I've been waiting for our more religious posters to comment on that. I recall there being something in the bible regarding marriage, and how before God, a husband's body belongs to his wife, and his wife's body belongs to him. So, I wonder how a wife could actually rape a husband. As another poster mentioned, he would have to be 'hard' at the time, meaning aroused, so it's hard to imagine a husband neglecting his wife, or wives at that point, unless he's just being an asshole and using sex as a power trip.

It's a double standard, a husband can rape a wife, but men are physically stronger than women. I just think it's near impossible for a wife to rape a husband, it just doesn't make any sense to me.

Why don't you tell us ? Remember the story when you were drinking with 2 chicks and they took you home and you don't know
what they did to you ? Didn't they drug you first ?

OHL? Please tell me I did not post that story...http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...mbarrassed.gif

That's different though, yes I believe my drink was spiked with something, and also, those women were not my wives. They lied, and took advantage of a person who was intoxicated. There's no mention of alcohol in the 6 wives case....geez, I can't believe I'm defending these wives.

You must have never heard of Viagra. It makes a man have a false fake erection regardless of his mind . And yes you did post a story.

This story gives no indication that Viagra was used. The man was having sex with a wife at the time these women demanded that they be satisfied too, so his mind and body was already aroused by the one wife. These wives had sticks, and knives, most likely kitchen knives, I doubt they had access to acquire Viagra.

I agree, I'm arguing a clear double standard, but look at this way. Say a man willing marries a crazy nymphomaniac gal who wants sex constantly. He willingly marries her for who she is. It's his obligation, as a husband, to do his best to keep her happy. Otherwise, don't get married. Same with this guy, he married 6 women, he shouldn't have done that if he was unwilling to fulfill the obligation.

WRONG AGAIN. He just returned home from a BAR. You only see what u want to see.
And if u doubt that the rich elite cannot get Viagra via non prescription anywhere anytime they want it,
then you are delusioned.

I'm just trying to see what 'likely' happened in this case. There is no mention of viagra. Furthermore, as I posted earlier, he was already aroused, so no viagra would even be needed.

I think you just want to argue, OHL.

No, I hate to argue. I am a very easy to get along with...... You just continually, repetitively, constantly talk out of both sides of your mouth to the point that
it is nauseating. I feel sorry for you.

You are just getting upset because I don't agree with you. Your comment here has nothing to do with this thread.

Here, OHL, read about implied vs. expressed consent. I believe these women had implied consent. If this guy didn't die, from whatever reason, heart condition, etc, I wonder if these women's actions would have even been questioned.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...mplied+consent

The criminal's goal certainly isn't the crime, assault with a deadly weapon is.

I am not getting upset, Solid, Slowbell,Liquid, etc etc.......I am telling you that conversation with you in IMPOSSIBLE. Forget about the Viagra. No viagra, OK ?
He just left a bar, do you think he was having a tea party at the bar ? You said there was NO mention of alcohol. There was alcohol involved.
Next, a husband has obligations to fulfill his wives needs.....yeah and ?? They should be allowed to RAPE HIM BY KNIFEPOINT & STICKS because
of his Biblical obligation ?? NO. Do you want me to do a search of how TRAUMATIZED and UPSET you were in your post about how you were at a bar drinking
and two women possibly drugged you and did God-knows-what with you ? I'm sure I can find it so that you can see yourself talk about how
AWFUL & TERRIFYING IT WAS. Married or not married RAPE OF ANYONE should be a shot to the head !!!!! Stop sticking up for a bunch of
psychotic women. He couldn't fulfill his obligation--no man could take care of all those wives-----he was an idiot----it still doesn't mean they had the right to
do that to him !!!!! WAKE UP !!!



[QUOTE]
I've been waiting for our more religious posters to comment on that. I recall there being something in the bible regarding marriage, and how before God, a husband's body belongs to his wife, and his wife's body belongs to him. So, I wonder how a wife could actually rape a husband.



In the Bible, God means that their bodies belong to each other out of LOVE, HONOR & RESPECT not forcibly to be taken, EVER.
He doesn't believe in a bunch of feminist psychotic crazy women with knives & sticks taking sex from him, Ok, nor him from her, OK
Anytime Satan enters the equation there is no love, honor nor respect.

"Wives, submit to your own husbands , as to the Lord. For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her . . .
"So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself . . .
"Nevertheless let each one of you in particular so love his own wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband." (Ephesians 5:22-25, 28, 33)
This shows a relationship between husband and wife that transcends anything physical. The husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is head of the church, and gave himself for it. His example, love, care, and concern should cause the wife to be more godly in the Holy Spirit. The wife should reverence her husband (Ephesians 5:33) and the husband should GIVE HIMSELF for his wife (verse 25) in working, living and helping to fulfill God's commands to him! This is as God intended from the start!

1 Cor 72 "But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. 3 The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. 5 Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control."

Also Solid, here is a thread about feminism and how these beast like women think, it is their way or NO WAY, always.
Just because these women/wives aren't in the US doesn't mean that Nigeria doesn't have it's own special gang of feminists !

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...ale-liberation

OHL, you are right. I can admit when I'm wrong. I don't know what I'm thinking, defending those women...http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/confused.png

Thanks for finding that passage in the bible, and the explanation of it.

Feminist Fighter til the day I die !! LOL !!! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo.../300 (206).gif





"No man is as anti-feminist as a really feminine woman."


http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/smiley.gif

OHL, we need more women like you in this world. That goes for all the ladies here on this forum, too. You all are an inspiration.