![]() |
Personality Test - take it, its fun
I've seen all these 4 letter .... descriptive things all over the net and just yesterday figured out what it was all about.
I'm kind of excited about it as my INTJ rating seems to be one of the best. See where you're at. It'll be fun http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes1.htm |
I think I've taken it around 3 or 4 times and ended up INTJ each time
|
I just took it:
INTJ Introvert(89%)**iNtuitive(25%)**iNtuitive**Thinkin g(50%)**Judging(1%) You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (89%) You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%) You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%) You have marginal or no preference of Judging over Perceiving (1%) Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging by Marina Margaret Heiss Profile: INTJ Revision: 3.1 Date of Revision: 17 Oct 2009 To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know. INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake. INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice. In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality. Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations. This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness. Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications. After reading the above, I'm a BELIEVER! It fits me to a "T". |
As I suspected Fuckingasshole(100%)
|
Hmm, maybe INTJ is going to be pretty common on the net. Everyone else is a tard watching something lame? Odd though because I saw some reports that we make up 1-2 percent of the population.
MORE! |
LOL I am going to go take the test. will report back.
http://www.humanmetrics.com/hr/JTypesResult.aspx ESTJ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think I may be one of the lazier varieties, but I think I just about have "it" figured out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2d9y4qq.jpg |
INTJ.
There was a thread like this on GIM1 and INTJ-INTP were predominant. |
Do you know of anyone who uses these 4 letter classifications to make a decision? Is this test just for our amusement? I have taken this test several times over a number of years, and it has never made one whit of difference in my life. I knew what I was before they had these 4 letter combinations. I think it's scientific value is on a par with that of astrology. What's your sign? I'm a Gemini.
Hatha |
Quote:
|
Oh great! I took the test only to find out I am an INTJ which apparently is Hillary Clinton's personality type
|
I'm a leo.
I don't think I have that strong of an inclination to introversion, and my judging over perceiving wasn't that strong as well. Depending on the phrasing of a few questions, I think I could easily be INTp. Or if I were rich, maybe eNTj or p |
INTJ
Introvert(22%) iNtuitive(75%) iNtuitive Thinking(50%) Judging(33%)
Apparently only 1-4% of the population is intj but it is a majority here at gsus...... |
Book, ximmy, Serpo, singular-me, and Horn need to take this test. They seem to be significantly different than everyone else. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/smiley.gif
|
INTP
Introvert(100%) iNtuitive(38%) iNtuitive Thinking(25%) Perceiving(11)%
Hopefully this is helpful to those data-mining this forum. Anything else I can do just let me know. |
INTJ
Introvert(67%) iNtuitive(62%) iNtuitive Thinking(62%) Judging(33%) So what? I'm still a Gemini. Hatha |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2