LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-21-2012, 11:31 AM   #1
tpJKhY8Z

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default The Falklands, does Argentina have a valid p.o.v.?
IF that is the case, then no.
tpJKhY8Z is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 12:08 PM   #2
Nupbeaupeteew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default
They should've cleansed the population when they had a chance. This always works.
Nupbeaupeteew is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 01:18 PM   #3
CsFLhGNp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Certainly worked with Argentina's own population during the Dirty War. Perhaps the Falklands could be 'returned' to the Argentinians when they return parts of Argentina to the original indigenous inhabitants.

The few that are left of course....
I've thought that the Dirty War was USA-sponsored anti-Socialist state terror. Do you have a link to where I could read about your part of the picture?
CsFLhGNp is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 05:39 PM   #4
Muramoursuard

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
588
Senior Member
Default
The war ****ed everything up. If it wasn't for it, the islands would probably already be a part of argentina.
Muramoursuard is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 05:50 PM   #5
GypeFeeshyTes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
Why is that?
GypeFeeshyTes is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 06:19 PM   #6
Skete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
I thought the island was inhabited by pirates in 1832 before the British took over?

Look at it this way, the inhabitants of the Falklands have no more right to self determination than do the Palestinians, the Abkhazians or the South Ossetians.
Skete is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 06:56 PM   #7
Tainlyferfara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
The argies would be better off if they were also governed from London
Tainlyferfara is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 07:27 PM   #8
gundos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
They also claim Taiwan!
gundos is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 07:39 PM   #9
vesiasmepay

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
I doubt it.
The islanders didn't.
vesiasmepay is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 07:42 PM   #10
Nothatspecial

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
I just found out on Wikipedia that they also claim South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands as well as a slice of Antarctica. Argentine tyranny and aggression knows no limits.
The brits and norweigans also claim slices of antarctica (along with Chile, Australia, New Zealand and a couple others IIRC)
Nothatspecial is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 07:49 PM   #11
AccusaJalsBub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
The Argentinians have no serious claim to the islands beyond relative geographic proximity.
This. Honestly, I fail to see how Argentinians running the islands would be better for the Falkland Islanders than the British.

It's like an international dick size contest. Hate to break it to the Argies, but Britain wins that contest by a couple miles.
AccusaJalsBub is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 07:52 PM   #12
chinesemedicine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
No, what happened was that the argies made a load of bad decisions for themselves.
chinesemedicine is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 08:16 PM   #13
exchpaypaleg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
I'd just like to see if, for once, HC can back up his claims. But as usual, he relies on you to save him.
exchpaypaleg is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 08:35 PM   #14
Qauunet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
That's not "evidence for a claim". That's "random wiki link".
Qauunet is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 08:45 PM   #15
Guaranano

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Here's the first post for you, KH.

I think their claims are absurd. Falklands have been settled by british people for nearly 200 years. The population is virtually all british and wish to remain a british territory.
Guaranano is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 08:55 PM   #16
ranndomderr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Here's the first post for you, KH.
And what does this hae to do with anything?
ranndomderr is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 08:56 PM   #17
abOfU9nJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
And what does this hae to do with anything?
It hae to do with everything! What does your response hae to do with what I posted?
abOfU9nJ is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 09:00 PM   #18
Dfvgthyju

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
548
Senior Member
Default
What snapped? I don't really give a **** about the argies or the falklands. I do note your continuing obsession with kuci's kid brother, though.
Dfvgthyju is offline


Old 01-21-2012, 09:07 PM   #19
neotheMit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
I really don't see Argentina as having a valid position wrt the Falklands because virtually no one on the Falklands actually wants to be part of Argentina. The guiding principle to all of these territorial disputes should be the self determination of people.
neotheMit is offline


Old 01-22-2012, 02:06 AM   #20
xADMlNx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
Argentina almost doesn't have an army, we could not invade Uruguay, and would lose a war to Perú.

That happens because the military is one of the most unpopular and less prestigious institutions of the country.
Mainly because of the last dictatorship, which ruined our economy, and in which they killed and disappeared around 8000 citizens, many of them terrorists, but many innocent, and even the ones who were terrorists should have deserved a fair trial. By doing that the military became terrorists themselves.

Two things were done in order to turn the military into something irrelevant, the first one was to put the people responsible for the crimes in jail be them Generals or soldiers obeying orders (they were put in jail in the 80s, forgiven in the 90s, and put back in jail the past decade) and the other was to diminish the budget of the military untill they become nothing more than glamorized cops.

So we have no chance of getting back the Falklands/Malvinas through war, also, the constitution which was reformed in 1994 says that Argentina will always reclaim the Islands, and intends to get them back according to international law, whatever that means, so military option is not considered, because it is impossible with the current army, and also because of the new constitution.
xADMlNx is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity