Two good questions for Ron Paul
 

Hello, guys.

Short introduction: Im a long time GSUS reader who finally has something worthy to post.

I have the opportunity to film Ron Paul for a short bit and need to come up with the best possible couple of questions for him. Obviously I needed to come to GSUS for input on this. Help me out!

Also toying with the idea of having him say, If you dont hold it, you dont own it. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/cheesy.gif

Welcome Hyperion!

Are you going to see him in Manhattan Beach tonight?

You lucky rascal!.....and Welcome!

Let me think on it while I go to the store..hopefully I'll come back with a great Q or two?

Rather than ask, why don't you beg him to repeal the 17th Amendment.

Addressing the massive CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) issue with him would be fantastic. There are several threads on it here which need to be bumped.

And yes, repeal the 17th amendment.

The president alone doesn't have the authority to repeal any of the constitutional amendments. But it does lead to another interesting question:

"How would you propose to implement your policy goals considering that Congress is the lawmaking branch of the government, and the President merely the executive?"

For example, I've heard him speaking about his "competition in currency" goal that would remove the exclusive legal tender status of the FRN, allowing competing currencies, but how would a president go about making this the law of the land?

RP doesn't exactly get along with congress at all; how would his being president change their willingness to pass constitution-friendly law?

Ask him if his Congress nickname "Dr. No" would evolve into a "President No" as he vetoes and vetoes all the BS spewing out of Congress. Congress must be stopped, and if not stopped, slowed down. A "President No" would be a fantastic way to frustrate the plans of the ruling congressional class.

I too would love to ask about the CAFR's but in all honesty it's a HUGE question and any answer would be deep and lengthy, probably not suited for the time you'll be afforded.

EoA's 17th amendment Q is a good one.

Sui Juris's Q is a good one.

1......Do you believe the Fed and its counterparts have manipulated the precious metals markets?

2.......Twice in the history of this country the central banking establishment has been dissolved, under both Jefferson and Jackson, do you feel that goal is even more important today?

1) Are you a member of the freemasonic cult, or any other secret society?

2) Is your wife a member of the Eastern star, or any other secret society?

...of course, even if he was, he would lie about it. LOL. That's what they do. Welcome to the forum.

Back it up with facts, if ya have any.

Edit: I was shitfaced and these accusations irritate me.

I believe by being a freemason he is under oath not to lie about it but admit. He was questioned on this a few times and he did deny.

A question I want answered by him or someone else who really knows the inner workings of government yet has maintained his integrity:

"I you had a child born today, would you get him a social security number?"

i think the eastern star freemason question is valid. i have seen many reports of him being a mason and his wife a member of the eastern star. i believe it is fair game.

If you became a serious threat to win the presidency...how can you possibly expect to remain alive? The government of Murder Inc. can get to anyone and you will be no exception.
Surely he must have given this some thought.

I'll just never be convinced that Ron's an evil man, at least not until it can be proven with facts and evidence. In all his years in the public eye there's nothing to suggest that he's anything but honorable and straight up.

Sorry Awoke, I just hate to see a good man besmirched on what amounts to a modern day witch hunt.

I know, right?

Cut the guy some fuckin' slack.

If you are to judge him at all, judge him by his actions, like his VOTING RECORD.

So what if he IS a mason... if we are to persecute him for his associations, he is also a congressman, and we know what kind of evil lurks in the halls of Congress.

Just what the fuck have we done for Liberty lately that holds a candle to Dr. Paul?

Fvck Gonzo, I think this next bud's for you!

First off, I like Dr. Paul, Mason or not. That being said....

Most here should know how the dialectic works: Problem > Reaction > Solution

The NWO wants to bring in a collectivised authoritartian dictatorship, and to do this they need the synthesis to their thesis. Their thesis is COLLECTIVISM. By introducing collectivism, you will automatically create a group that opposes it. These are the people who want to remain INDIVIDUALS. And wether they know it or not, they are acting as the synthesis that the NWO needs to create chaos. Out of chaos come ORDER.

Remember what Lenin said: "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves"

Like it or not, most of our founding fathers were masons (or sympathetic to the ideas of masonry). Still it would be disturbing if he were [especially active] a mason.