[vicgirl]

We depend on words. We place enormous faith in words—that they mean and sound as intended—in order to live in this world. We “trust” words using words like “trust” --from 12th Century Latin trausti = "an approved agreement, deed, oath or alliance as a subject of the church"-- Its claimed origins from Old Norse deliberately misleading.

Is this what you mean when you use, write and speak the word “trust”? Have you consented to an oath or alliance as a subject of the Roman Cult enthroned at Vatican Hill? Maybe you have, maybe you have not. But most people would never have heard of this original and primary meaning—the true intended meaning of the constructed word.

Why is the first meaning of a word important anyway? We are taught that words are pegs upon which ideas are attached—mere tools to convey meaning—not really having any “great and mystical power”. Yet this deliberate confused teaching is in direct contradiction to the very nature of words and their vocal pronunciation throughout history. Words are power—special words have special power.

The ancient belief in words having "magical" power
So thought the Egyptians, the Sumerians, the Phoenicians, the Greeks, the Romans and all ancient civilizations that created new forms of writing, attached meaning to the arrangement of symbols including meaningful sound.

From the very beginning of civilization itself, words themselves were magical—and to know the true meaning of a word and its origins was to hold in your grasp real power.
The origins of words and power
It is one thing to forget the precedence of history that the true meaning of a word is power, it is another thing entirely to forget that all language--all language created by men and women has a single point of origin--an architect.
As it happens, there are specific points and individuals in history that excelled in the creation of new words and meanings with then long periods of use, or eventual decline.
In the 8th Century, Charlemagne and his family were instrumental in the creation of many hundreds of new words attached to meanings in the form of the language Anglaisé--the proper ancient name for Old French and the 1st official language of the Catholic Church.
In the 11th Century, Gregory VII financed by Venetian Sephardic Jewish exile Pietro Leoni were instrumental in creating hundreds of new Latin words, and the corruption of many ancient meanings to form the liturgy and framework of the Roman Cult, which took over the Catholic Church.
Then in the 12th Century, Nicholas Sheakspeare the true "Father of English" also known as Pope Adrian IV-- the first and only English Pope of the Catholic Church and the only Pope to switch from being Catholic to being a member of the Roman Cult --was instrumental with King Henry II in the formation of a uniquely "English" brand of hybrid Anglaisé-Latin to form the legal framework of English.
And in the 13th Century, individuals such as Pope Innocent IV, Francis of Assisi and Thomas Acquinas were key in the establishment of the backbone of the modern legal system from Venetian maritime law through the creation of even more corrupted Latin words and even hybrid English back to Latin.
Why are the true original meaning of so many words hidden?
So how come the original meaning of “trust” is hidden? How come the original meaning of so many words we take for granted --for example understand meaning “To stand under the authority of the Church (Roman Cult)”— are also deliberately hidden?

The answer is simple—“they” do not want you to know the true nature and meaning of the words you use every day without ever questioning what you are actually saying under “their” system—from “person”, to “claim”, to “deposit” to even the word “law” itself.

The catch-22 of modern law and meaning of key words
A classic of why this system of deliberate hidding meaning is in place is in regards to the practical operation of local, national and international law.
Many a bright person who has studied law soon identify key words that have important power within the legal system--REGINA meaning "The Crown" is one such example. But unless an individual can demonstrate to the Court an understanding and precedence of the legal terms being used, the knowledge of key legal terms and ancient legal phrases are of little use.
But when an individual is capable of demonstrating a real understanding of words within a Court, then it is possible to shift the power almost immediately to your favour to some degree.
The intention of this glossary
The intention therefore of this glossary is to provide an insight into some of the important legal words of power and control used by modern governments pledging alliance to the present legal system of the Holy See—the “common law” that threads its web throughout almost every single nation on Earth.


By understanding the original meaning and intention of these words, it is hoped you will better understand the implications of many of the documents and actions you take for granted on a daily basis.

more at http://one-evil.org/

[chelviweeme]

Jesus Christ admonished us to keep our words scarce. I wonder why.

I've been beating this drum for quite some time...when I first started beating it, people (even people on this forum) thought I was nuts. Consider:
propaganda- pro PAGAN da
congress- con gress
school- sheol
journalist- JEW- nialist
library- lie- berry (fruit of lies)

These 'coincidences' are everywhere, just look for them.

dys

[GfBTWMmV]

excellent post guys and strangely this has been on my mind yesterday and today.

A strawman/birthcertificate/legal fiction person is a trust. IF no one is avalailable to administer the trust someone will step in and do it when the cricumstances require it. If you think it's your trust then you should do it. If you are unable for competency reasons (uneducated) someone i.e. the court, will do it for you.

[Cvo1iRT0]

Another very interesting thing to consider is lack of words. Words are indeed mystical, however saying nothing seems to be a very deep thing to me as well. I've been thinking about it for a long time.

[TeLMgNva]

Another very interesting thing to consider is lack of words. Words are indeed mystical, however saying nothing seems to be a very deep thing to me as well. I've been thinking about it for a long time.

The world without language is the world as it truly is.

[popillio]

from the depths of the heart speaketh the mouth.

[lalffibra]

journalist- JEW- nialist

I would say JEW-Nihilist.
Good post though.

[EvaQWmrm]

res-ident = identity of the res (property)
add-res(s) = location of the property
person = persona, a mask such as an actor wears on a stage

[Pszinygv]

dys,

No offense pal but that post is nonsense. You would benefit to study ancient Greek and Latin where most of our word roots come from - saying a word sounds like something else has zero bearing on the root origin of a word.

You can play the - lie-berry game all day and it is nothing more than word games in your mind.

There is no doubt that language as a whole is suffering due to lazy minds. Rather than continue the destruction of language examine the deconstruction of language. It is far more interesting and more importantly, based on logic rather than the slurring of the tongue.

This is the same weak style theorizing that led people to think the 5 hour "Ring of Power" series was accurate.

[chelviweeme]

Here is another example of how language tricks can really effect people's perception of things:

Over the past 20 years or so, fasting has started to be referred to as "starving ones self" or a "starvation" diet. Because of this one tricky word, many people actually believe that someone going on a short fast is literally starving. It has even become en vogue for a reduced calorie diet to be known as a "starvation diet" even as many people considering such a diet are severely overweight. It is fascinating to me that even though there is ZERO practical risk of most people starving/wasting away, many people still believe that there is.
Again, these language tricks are everywhere.

dys

[blackjackblax]

i'm learning to understand my chickens' language.

Loud Squawk = "I'm hungry".

Super Loud Squawk = "I'm VERY hungry".

Clucking sound = "I'm OK".

Silent = "I'm laying an egg".

Purring = "Everything is Sweet in Chicken-land".

[popillio]

i'm learning to understand my chickens' language.

you speak chicken too?? my dog and i do too!

[GfBTWMmV]

from the depths of the heart speaketh the mouth.

We have a bit of a saying down this way: It all comes out, in the mouth. Not quite as elegant but some wisdom there.

The context was that some times you might say something you didn't intend to say but it reveals true your thinking or that you lied about something. It comes from some one who mixes their metaphors with hilarious results. They may have meant "in the wash" but this works even better IMO. That and many other things they have said have become part of the local vanacular.

[popillio]

my mom told us that all the time when we were kids. i didn't pay much attention to it til i was older. i was also told that there's a little truth in every joke....

[Plokiikmol]

Another very interesting thing to consider is lack of words. Words are indeed mystical, however saying nothing seems to be a very deep thing to me as well. I've been thinking about it for a long time.

Proverbs 17:28 Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.