General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
In general, you go to a conference to see me speak live. I am there to deliver the talk. If you also get to meet me face to face and shake my hand, that's great, but that is not something that should be expected. Some people assume that's part of the deal and get angry if it doesn't happen. We can't control that. Just be cool, and be glad that you're around such amazing people! " |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Maybe there is something behind the claims of nukes...: something from that link..... ![]() Press Core writes, the green lines indicate the blunt tremor that was felt in Washington D.C. and the black lines are a transparent overlay of a normal earthquake seismograph from a pdf file from Virginia Division Mineral Resources on Earthquakes. That file describes a typical natural occurring earthquake as: When a fault ruptures, energy is released in the form of seismic waves. The first waves to reach the earth’s surface are primary or 'P' waves (Figure 2). P waves are compressional waves that travel at a speed of about four miles per second near the surface – faster as depth increases. The next waves to reach the earth’s surface are secondary or 'S' waves. S waves are shear waves that move at a speed of about 1.5 miles per second. P and S waves are body waves that travel through the earth much like sonar waves travel through water. Surface waves, which are slower than S waves, travel along the surface of the earth much like waves at the surface of the ocean. S waves and surface waves cause the most destruction at the earth’s surface.The article concludes; "What is missing from the seismograph for the Washington DC area 5.8 magnitude earthquake are the primary or 'P' waves. All earthquakes that are the direct result of fault rupture have these primary or 'P' waves. Nuclear detonations do not." also..... http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4009 |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
I have been thinking on this interview, and I will listen to it again in the near future.
but I suspect a lot of it is true. it is pretty widely known (georgia guidestones for example), that these psychopaths want to kill 85-90% of the worlds population. thats over 5 billion people. now if even 1/10 of 1% woke upto the conspiracy... well, 1% = 50 million 1/10 of 1% = 5 million I am guessing the total elite are perhaps 10,000 or less including all the military/defense/intelligence folks, you get maybe 2-3 hundred thousand (guesstimate) the point being is the numbers are so off.... so I always wondered with the internet, if even a small percentage of any other group woke up, well its game over... |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
like remember awhile back, Jim sinclair, and jim willie (they were the first ones), they talked about a floor on gold & silver from Asia.
Sinclair had some nickname for them, Cannot remember it... "something phat" he really started promoting these "rogue asian" buyers after gold passed $1,000.00 He said they would never let gold drop below that ($1000.00) again. then we have this wynter benton group, destroying the silver market. now some of these folks are in it for a profit, but some I suspect want to bring the system down.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Why should it? It's a one-time event. ASFAIK, other man-made earthquakes have not produced aftershocks like natural earthquakes do. AnimatedGIF-ROFLMOASmiley.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Just read up on the Seismic effect of nukes:
Cannikin was detonated on November 6, 1971, as the thirteenth test of the Operation Grommet (1971–1972) underground nuclear test series. The announced yield was 5 megatons (21*PJ) – the largest underground nuclear test in US history.[23] (Estimates for the precise yield range from 4.4[34] to 5.2[35] megatons or 18 to 22*PJ). The ground lifted 20 feet (6*m), caused by an explosive force almost 400 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb.[36] Subsidence and faulting at the site created a new lake, over a mile wide.[3] The explosion caused a seismic shock of 7.0 on the Richter scale, causing rockfalls and turf slides of a total of 35,000 square feet (3,300*m2).[23] Though earthquakes and tsunamis predicted by environmentalists did not occur,[32] a number of small tectonic events did occur in the following weeks, (some registering as high as 4.0 on the richter scale) thought to be due to the interaction of the explosion with local tectonic stresses.[37] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amchitka I guess a 3-400 kt TNT equivalent size of a nuke could create an earthquake of 5.8 magnitude, and it could create smaller aftershocks as was seen after the Amchitka nuke. As a sidenote a 150 kton nuke at wtc should have created an earthquake that was at least 5.3 or so on the richterscale. If I recall it correct the seismic force of the collapsing towers were less than 3 which is at least 2 magnitudes lower... |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|