General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
i know 18psi has a scan gauge, perhaps he can letcha borrow it or use it or something, not monitoring knock eh? well as u said its been awhile since uve done pulls, ive been neglecting my knock for awhile, than i got home to the dsp and realize i had 5 degrees of it...5 minutes later...bam, nothing thru all 4 gears i tried, simple WOT spark adjustment, but for you, im not sure how you would stabilize ur knock out not having that cause ud be happy with ur fuel levels than ud have to cut them back to get rid of knock. gr...the shit is so time consuming, why cant i have a car like jose's where i put the parts on and it runs like a fucking stage 2 on an s0 pcm. good god.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
If you were on a mustang dyno(loaded dyno) a 265whp output is close to 290whp on a dynojet dyno. As for the torque our little stock turbos are torque monsters because of their quick spool time. Some people have seen nearly 400ft lbs on their stock turbo when they crank the boost up to 24-25psi........the downfall of doing that is the HP output will be hurt because peak HP for our stocker is around 20psi. Anything more than 20psi actually hurts top end power, but man it can be fun to have all that torque
![]() In other words you can add close to 10% on top of a mustang dyno output and that will equal a dynojet output which is likely where most of these 300whp guys have gone to get readings. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
If you were on a mustang dyno(loaded dyno) a 265whp output is close to 290whp on a dynojet dyno. As for the torque our little stock turbos are torque monsters because of their quick spool time. Some people have seen nearly 400ft lbs on their stock turbo when they crank the boost up to 24-25psi........the downfall of doing that is the HP output will be hurt because peak HP for our stocker is around 20psi. Anything more than 20psi actually hurts top end power, but man it can be fun to have all that torque ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
I don't know is there an ACTUAL correction factor to use to get a real HP #??? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
That is the actual Scientific factor WAY over my head.
I was looking for the correction factor to make the Mustang === Dyno Jet HP #'s more equal. I heard that you add about, ABOUT, 10% to Mustang #'s to match what a Dyno Jet see. IE Mustang #: 300 HP Dyno Jet would see 330hp 300 + 30 (10%) = 330 Just what I have been reading/hearing -Slyder |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
That is the actual Scientific factor WAY over my head. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 14 (0 members and 14 guests) | |
|