LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-16-2011, 02:18 AM   #1
7UENf0w7

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default Report: Nearly 80% of Obama’s Top Bundlers Given “Key Administration Posts”
I love how you try to deflect withering criticism by declaring that the criticism proves Obama isn't coated in teflon.
7UENf0w7 is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 03:00 AM   #2
aburva.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
An additional 6% over the previous administration. "Withering". Yeah.
aburva.org is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 03:12 AM   #3
snova

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
This is the sort of corruption which really pisses me off. Yes, everyone has done this since at least Reagan but that doesn't make it any better.
snova is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 03:44 AM   #4
Gymngatagaica

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...ion-posts.html

This just proves the liberal media is in love with Obama and won't say anything bad about him.
Not many people would consider Jake Tapper part of the "liberal media"; he's been notably willing to criticize Obama for quite a while now.
Gymngatagaica is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 04:13 AM   #5
Saispapedlimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
Not many people would consider Jake Tapper part of the "liberal media"; he's been notably willing to criticize Obama for quite a while now.
What, and ABC News hasn't fired him? The liberal media is really slipping up.
Saispapedlimi is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 04:16 AM   #6
Qnnoshxj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
Change FAIL.

I have to say, I'm not one to believe in Pols. But I did think he'd be at least marginally better on something like this. Instead... worse. Sweet. Well, let's look at the alternative... Yep, folks, we're screwed.

-Arrian
Qnnoshxj is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 10:05 PM   #7
mbaueee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
"liberal = unwilling to criticize Obama in 2008" is more accurate.
I'm not a liberal? Should I be or or
mbaueee is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 10:32 PM   #8
DoctorGordanBens

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
If I had to speculate wildly, I'd guess that Obama's relative newness to the political scene meant he had a shortage of trusted political allies from which to appoint administration posts. As a consequence he dipped into his pool of donors for administrative posts more than a veteran politician might have.
By that measure, voting for a political outsider is the surest means to allow entrenched interests to gain the largest sway.
DoctorGordanBens is offline


Old 06-16-2011, 11:30 PM   #9
skydaypat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Its not a defense of Obama its a lame attempt to lay claim that the media doesn't love love themselves some Obama.
skydaypat is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity