General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Well, at least the Danish navy can get a bit further than the Swedes...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_%28ship%29 |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Well, at least the Danish navy can get a bit further than the Swedes... Visby is thoroughly Swedish OTOH: ![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visby_class_corvette |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Are you supposed to be the future of the US armed forces, Albert? I kid, I kid. Anyway, I looked up Phalanx on Wiki and it seems it's a system of autotracking anti-missile gatling guns. It also says they're intended as a final line of defense, but three presumptively are adequate for a ship that size, so anti-ship missiles wouldn't have such an easy time. But comparing a small stealth patrol ship (I assume it's a patrol ship) to a massive floating carrier is pretty apples-and-oranges. Xpost. By the by, if we're talking armament, Wiki says that little ship has eight anti-ship missiles and a single gun turret, plus mines and depth charges. Second edit: Wiki also says that particular ship has two, not three, Phalanx systems, FYI. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
It won't need to when these come streaming towards shore: What your beaches going to do now? We have invisible guns in the sands and rocks in those beaches. There are invisible ships patrolling the surface and invisible subs below, and their missiles will mostly come too fast for your ancient defensive systems. Stupid dick-measuring aside, most of the US navy is blue-water and built to fight ww2 all over again. They can't even defeat a determined medieval opponent (the Taliban). What would happen if the US would fight somebody of similar technological sophistication? What if the navy found itself in brown waters? It's an interesting question not easily dismissed. Of course, the low general quality of US servicemen compared to Europeans, which is well-known from both ww1 and ww2, must be taken into account as well. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|