LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-09-2010, 02:09 AM   #1
ppaelkos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Canada
Posts
379
Senior Member
Default Royal Danish Navy's 500 years birthday
13 October 1775
ppaelkos is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 02:13 AM   #2
JohnMaltczevitch

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
If it was created in 1510 it was never bigger than the Spanish, British or Dutch navy

Did you mean Viking times?
JohnMaltczevitch is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 02:29 AM   #3
maniaringsq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
All I know about that period in Danish history I learned from Europa Universalis. You guys were briefly on top... Kalmar Union... Norway and Sweden as your *****es...

What happened? You could've had class. You could've been a contender! You could've been somebody, instead of the bum of Europe!
maniaringsq is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 02:40 AM   #4
VogsHoock

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
And kick Danish ass all across the Baltic!


I notice that centuries later, the Nazis didn't even bother to invade Sweden but they over-ran Denmark in about 12 hours. Apparently, they must've been more scared of Sweden than the Soviet Union, UK, and US COMBINED!
VogsHoock is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 02:52 AM   #5
68AttendGem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Hate to break it to ya, but a dude in a rowboat with a scaling knife does not a navy make.
68AttendGem is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 03:29 AM   #6
bF8CCmmr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
bF8CCmmr is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 09:22 PM   #7
SobiquYo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default


The Danish navy on shore leave?
SobiquYo is offline


Old 08-09-2010, 09:28 PM   #8
Gorlummm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
What fleet?
Gorlummm is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 01:41 AM   #9
uwJzsM8t

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
You beat me to it!

Nelson + Copenhagen = Danish Asses getting raped!
uwJzsM8t is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 01:59 AM   #10
G8whlTAe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Well, at least the Danish navy can get a bit further than the Swedes...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_%28ship%29
G8whlTAe is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 04:51 AM   #11
FUNALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Well, at least the Danish navy can get a bit further than the Swedes...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_%28ship%29
Designed by Dutch people... Obviously an error in judgment.

Visby is thoroughly Swedish OTOH:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visby_class_corvette
FUNALA is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:06 AM   #12
Hlennisal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
504
Senior Member
Default
It's a stealth ship, dumbass. It's internal.

Are you supposed to be the future of the US armed forces, Albert? Things are looking rather bleak for the American empire, isn't it?
Hlennisal is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:18 AM   #13
Ekzamenov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
One anti-ship missile and it's bye-bye for that floating hearse. I'd like to see that hunk of junk in a Swedish archipelago.
Ekzamenov is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:28 AM   #14
pKgGpUlF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default
Yes, good luck to hit that huge square piece of ww2 technology. Dumbass.
pKgGpUlF is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:38 AM   #15
Atmotteenrift

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Are you supposed to be the future of the US armed forces, Albert?
Well, they are talking about repealing DADT. :rimshot:

I kid, I kid. Anyway, I looked up Phalanx on Wiki and it seems it's a system of autotracking anti-missile gatling guns. It also says they're intended as a final line of defense, but three presumptively are adequate for a ship that size, so anti-ship missiles wouldn't have such an easy time. But comparing a small stealth patrol ship (I assume it's a patrol ship) to a massive floating carrier is pretty apples-and-oranges.

Xpost. By the by, if we're talking armament, Wiki says that little ship has eight anti-ship missiles and a single gun turret, plus mines and depth charges.

Second edit: Wiki also says that particular ship has two, not three, Phalanx systems, FYI.
Atmotteenrift is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:48 AM   #16
ElegeExcest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Elok:

It's not a massive floating carrier... it's an amphibious assault ship capable of landing up to 2200 Marines either via air or landing craft.



The US Navy has 8 of these babies...

And its laughable to think that any nation on the planet could possibly compete with the United States on sea.
ElegeExcest is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:51 AM   #17
wbeachcomber

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
385
Senior Member
Default
Xpost. By the by, if we're talking armament, Wiki says that little ship has eight anti-ship missiles and a single gun turret, plus mines and depth charges.
The carrier doesn't stand a chance.

Second edit: Wiki also says that particular ship has two, not three, Phalanx systems, FYI. What a waste.
wbeachcomber is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:53 AM   #18
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Second edit: Wiki also says that particular ship has two, not three, Phalanx systems, FYI.
The USS Wasp has 2 but some of the USS Wasp-class have 3 and others have 2. It's variable.
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 05:59 AM   #19
MeeveStesia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
Not on sea, on shore. Which none of those beasts - and I don't care what you call them - would come close to.
It won't need to when these come streaming towards shore:



With these overhead airdropping Marines:




What your beaches going to do now?
MeeveStesia is offline


Old 08-10-2010, 06:24 AM   #20
bestgenpower

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
It won't need to when these come streaming towards shore:
Huh? That's not hi-tech. It could easily run an old ww1 mine that's not marked on your tourist maps.

What your beaches going to do now? We have invisible guns in the sands and rocks in those beaches. There are invisible ships patrolling the surface and invisible subs below, and their missiles will mostly come too fast for your ancient defensive systems.

Stupid dick-measuring aside, most of the US navy is blue-water and built to fight ww2 all over again. They can't even defeat a determined medieval opponent (the Taliban). What would happen if the US would fight somebody of similar technological sophistication? What if the navy found itself in brown waters? It's an interesting question not easily dismissed. Of course, the low general quality of US servicemen compared to Europeans, which is well-known from both ww1 and ww2, must be taken into account as well.
bestgenpower is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity