Bomb in Times Square - Page 5 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Sleedyhex** · 08-05-2010, 12:00 PM

Maybe it's a write off, looks good for insurance reasons, and better yet, they can spy on their employees?

it prevents employee theft as well.

come on....seriously.... you think they spend millions on survellance as a write off? they use it because it lowers theft. fullstop.

**TeemFilla** · 08-05-2010, 12:03 PM

it prevents employee theft as well.

come on....seriously.... you think they spend millions on survellance as a write off? they use it because it lowers theft. fullstop.

I'll tell you right now full stop is a pipe dream. Employees maybe, but the people that come to steal don't really care.

Hell Walmart had a policy of not prosecuting any theft under $25

**Sleedyhex** · 08-05-2010, 12:09 PM

I'll tell you right now full stop is a pipe dream. Employees maybe, but the people that come to steal don't really care.

Hell Walmart had a policy of not prosecuting any theft under $25

I don't mean totally prevent. clearly I mean "reduces" and that's a fact. it's also common sense.

**TeemFilla** · 08-05-2010, 12:12 PM

I don't mean totally prevent. clearly I mean "reduces" and that's a fact. it's also common sense.

In a better world maybe, but I'm not seeing it. [no]

In the end it's all the same. people steal as much as they ever did

**Sleedyhex** · 08-05-2010, 12:20 PM

In a better world maybe, but I'm not seeing it. [no]

In the end it's all the same. people steal as much as they ever did

why would they bother with survellence then? as a write-off? [rolleyes]

come on, seriously. it's preposterous to claim survellence systems don't reduce shoplifting.

**TeemFilla** · 08-05-2010, 12:26 PM

why would they bother with survellence then? as a write-off? [rolleyes]

come on, seriously. it's preposterous to claim survellence systems don't reduce shoplifting.

look I'm just saying.. I know what you are saying and I'm not trying to stab you in the face and say you are flat out wrong. I would like to think and agree with you, but I just don't think it's so.

Anymore than banning guns takes the guns out of the hands of the criminals. that's all.

**Sleedyhex** · 08-05-2010, 02:47 PM

well think and answer my question then

why would the vast majority of stores large and small (that are profit motivated) invest millions in surveillence systems?

is "write off" the best answer you can come up with?

**TeemFilla** · 08-05-2010, 02:59 PM

well think and answer my question then why would the vast majority of stores large and small (that are profit motivated) invest millions in surveillence systems?

is "write off" the best answer you can come up with?

Honestly that's the best I've got, but I do wonder..
I'm not saying I have the answer or that I am correct, just saying.

maybe they get a dinner at happy steak?

We have those sensors at the door as well. they go off like crazy. Nobody pays no mind.

I said it like that to sound unedumacated

**TeemFilla** · 08-05-2010, 03:25 PM

Ok EP I don't have all night to stare at your orange light and wait for your next response. I'll go to bed knowing I just stated my opinion, right or wrong. snooze

peace.

**Sleedyhex** · 08-05-2010, 03:51 PM

Ok EP I don't have all night to stare at your orange light and wait for your next response. I'll go to bed knowing I just stated my opinion, right or wrong. snooze

peace.

right on... sweet dreams[thumbup] sleep on it.....and then wake up and tell me I'm right

08-05-2010, 12:00 PM	#81
Sleedyhex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	Maybe it's a write off, looks good for insurance reasons, and better yet, they can spy on their employees? it prevents employee theft as well. come on....seriously.... you think they spend millions on survellance as a write off? they use it because it lowers theft. fullstop. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 12:03 PM	#82
TeemFilla Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	it prevents employee theft as well. come on....seriously.... you think they spend millions on survellance as a write off? they use it because it lowers theft. fullstop. I'll tell you right now full stop is a pipe dream. Employees maybe, but the people that come to steal don't really care. Hell Walmart had a policy of not prosecuting any theft under $25 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 12:09 PM	#83
Sleedyhex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	I'll tell you right now full stop is a pipe dream. Employees maybe, but the people that come to steal don't really care. Hell Walmart had a policy of not prosecuting any theft under $25 I don't mean totally prevent. clearly I mean "reduces" and that's a fact. it's also common sense. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 12:12 PM	#84
TeemFilla Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	I don't mean totally prevent. clearly I mean "reduces" and that's a fact. it's also common sense. In a better world maybe, but I'm not seeing it. [no] In the end it's all the same. people steal as much as they ever did Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 12:20 PM	#85
Sleedyhex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	In a better world maybe, but I'm not seeing it. [no] In the end it's all the same. people steal as much as they ever did why would they bother with survellence then? as a write-off? [rolleyes] come on, seriously. it's preposterous to claim survellence systems don't reduce shoplifting. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 12:26 PM	#86
TeemFilla Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	why would they bother with survellence then? as a write-off? [rolleyes] come on, seriously. it's preposterous to claim survellence systems don't reduce shoplifting. look I'm just saying.. I know what you are saying and I'm not trying to stab you in the face and say you are flat out wrong. I would like to think and agree with you, but I just don't think it's so. Anymore than banning guns takes the guns out of the hands of the criminals. that's all. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 02:47 PM	#87
Sleedyhex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	well think and answer my question then why would the vast majority of stores large and small (that are profit motivated) invest millions in surveillence systems? is "write off" the best answer you can come up with? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 02:59 PM	#88
TeemFilla Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	well think and answer my question then why would the vast majority of stores large and small (that are profit motivated) invest millions in surveillence systems? is "write off" the best answer you can come up with? Honestly that's the best I've got, but I do wonder.. I'm not saying I have the answer or that I am correct, just saying. maybe they get a dinner at happy steak? We have those sensors at the door as well. they go off like crazy. Nobody pays no mind. I said it like that to sound unedumacated Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 03:25 PM	#89
TeemFilla Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	Ok EP I don't have all night to stare at your orange light and wait for your next response. I'll go to bed knowing I just stated my opinion, right or wrong. snooze peace. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-05-2010, 03:51 PM	#90
Sleedyhex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	Ok EP I don't have all night to stare at your orange light and wait for your next response. I'll go to bed knowing I just stated my opinion, right or wrong. snooze peace. right on... sweet dreams[thumbup] sleep on it.....and then wake up and tell me I'm right Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (0 members and 10 guests)