General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Hardcore OC'ing and modding computers and squeezing every mhz out of components is very geeky, not so much nerdy. I love being geeky! Chicks dig it [thumbup] warranty on an x3210? here is my answer to that... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
If you have never cut a blow hole in a beige pc case you have no mad skills [yes] hahahaha!! Most people here are wondering what you mean by "beige". ________ ****tube.om |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
The best heat spreader for a CPU would be if the chip manufacturer would build a HSF directly on top of the core instead of having that "cheap" heat spreader on there. But thats not cost effective for mass production. Having that lapped or nearly flawless surface on the heat spreader easily results in better cooling. Its best if the HSF is also lapped. When you have that nearly flawless connection between the top surface of the spreader and the HSF, you get as close as you can to the HSF actually being the spreader.
When you lap, you do it in stages with the sandpaper. When you start out, you can see just how crappy the surface is. I give the pics of my lap job on my E8400 as evidence. Here is what the CPU and HSF looked like before: ![]() This is after the first run with the 600 grit. you can see some copper showing through. See just how uneven the nickel surface really in on a CPU heat spreader. ![]() Here is after the 800 grit run. The copper is coming through more. You can tell the lowesrt part of the surface (the surface making the least contact with the heatsink) is the center. the area where the cores are! ![]() ![]() Here is after the 1000 grit. You can still see some nickel in the center, this chip's heat spreader was terrible! and you wouldn't know how bad unless you did this. ![]() Here it is pretty much finished. going to do a few more runs with the 2000 grit for sport. Then do the heatsink on the CNPS9500 cooler. ![]() And the final results before reinstall. I used IC Diamond thermal compound. I ran prime95 again, and it never went over 47c. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
Does the lapping actually do anything in terms of temps ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
Someone said a few posts back that copper is a better conductor than the paste (which makes sense), but even with lapping can you really get rid of enough of the imperfections in the surfaces so you don't need paste at all? the question still remains if the difference is worth it ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
That was such a wonderful time... Around the GeForce area, I don't think I even had internet, so all the PC news I got came through magazines. Reading about the phenomenal power of these things, seeing the few benchmarks the magazine had, that video card was like a myth! It was the only one of its kind, the only thing out there that could best Quake Arena, the ultimate setup... Now powerful videocards are a dime a dozen. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Nobody can call themselves a real modder unless they've performed an L1 bridge fill in with pencil or rear window defroster kit or sat next to a computer with a Delta 60mm 8000 rpm fan for hours on end just to get their TBird 1333 to run at 1450 Mhz. I think I'm deaf in my left ear because of it. If you've never heard a Delta fan... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfBGy0FuSGQ
I miss those days... Someone said a few posts back that copper is a better conductor than the paste (which makes sense), but even with lapping can you really get rid of enough of the imperfections in the surfaces so you don't need paste at all? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests) | |
|