LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-08-2009, 09:58 PM   #1
WelcomeMe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default 2000 posts.
And it only took me 7 1/2 years to get here.
WelcomeMe is offline


Old 07-08-2009, 10:15 PM   #2
medifastwoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
And it only took me 7 1/2 years to get here.
I am impressed.

How many of them do you think were ATi/AMD fanboy posts?
medifastwoman is offline


Old 07-08-2009, 10:38 PM   #3
WelcomeMe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default
I am impressed.

How many of them do you think were ATi/AMD fanboy posts?
Most of them I belive.
WelcomeMe is offline


Old 07-08-2009, 11:01 PM   #4
tsamprasxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Most of them I belive.
Eugh..the worst sort of fanboism, the ones that are proud of it![beta]

Nah J/k..doesn't matter..[thumbup]
tsamprasxx is offline


Old 07-08-2009, 11:34 PM   #5
ggiifdfalls

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
OMG ... You spammer!!! (grin) Grats on the 2k mark!
ggiifdfalls is offline


Old 07-08-2009, 11:36 PM   #6
MidwestMadman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Slow spammer is slow!
MidwestMadman is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 12:06 AM   #7
ariniaxia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
I think I got past 2,000 by the end of 2001 mostly due to my heavy debating about Intel being superior to AMD.
ariniaxia is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 12:39 AM   #8
Tic Tac Took

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
568
Senior Member
Default
When will I get there?
Tic Tac Took is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 12:46 AM   #9
no02rSx2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
1577 FTW, i look upto people like CB and so on, i want to be the one[cursing]
no02rSx2 is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 01:09 AM   #10
Immampdah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
744
Senior Member
Default
My post count would be a lot higher if GD still counted.
Immampdah is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 01:41 AM   #11
tsamprasxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
I think I got past 2,000 by the end of 2001 mostly due to my heavy debating about Intel being superior to AMD.
Weren't AMD better than Intel around that time?
tsamprasxx is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 01:51 AM   #12
Kilsimpaile

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Hell I don't even have 1000 posts yet and I've been here forever.
Kilsimpaile is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 03:57 AM   #13
ariniaxia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Weren't AMD better than Intel around that time?
Intel was better until AMD brought out their Athlon XP on October 9, 2001, then Pentium 4 got assaulted bigtime. No one was gonna convince me that the previous AMD Thunderbird at 1.33GHz was superior to a Pentium 4 1.5GHz with RDRAM.

I was then a staunch AMD supporter until end of 2006 going into '07, when I got my Core 2 Quad Q6600 and have loved Intel more ever since!
ariniaxia is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 04:03 AM   #14
medifastwoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Intel was better until AMD brought out their Athlon XP on October 9, 2001, then Pentium 4 got assaulted bigtime. No one was gonna convince me that the previous AMD Thunderbird at 1.33GHz was superior to a Pentium 4 1.5GHz with RDRAM.

I was then a staunch AMD supporter until end of 2006 going into '07, when I got my Core 2 Quad Q6600 and have loved Intel more ever since!
AMD was the first to 1GHz in late 2000, I believe. They were at least competitive then (much moreso than now).
medifastwoman is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 04:14 AM   #15
ariniaxia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Yeah they beat Intel to 1GHz, how sad was that.

But, Intel beat them to 2.0GHz and then 3.0GHz unfortunately it did not matter at that point cause today it's all about cores and pathways.
ariniaxia is offline


Old 07-09-2009, 04:46 AM   #16
WelcomeMe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default
But, Intel beat them to 2.0GHz and then 3.0GHz unfortunately it did not matter at that point cause today it's all about cores and pathways.
True, but it would still be cool if AMD or Intel dropped a multi-core(4,6,12) 4ghz CPU just for s**** and giggles.
WelcomeMe is offline


Old 08-08-2009, 07:09 AM   #17
Cgnebksb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
True, but it would still be cool if AMD or Intel dropped a multi-core(4,6,12) 4ghz CPU just for s**** and giggles.
i imagine they could if they wanted, i hit 4.0ghz pretty easy on my i7 (and thats not even its limit)


but yeah it took me a while to hit 2k posts as well and ive been here a while too

you can say you have been here a while if you remember the madonion days[thumbup]
Cgnebksb is offline


Old 08-08-2009, 05:50 PM   #18
tsamprasxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Yeah they beat Intel to 1GHz, how sad was that.

But, Intel beat them to 2.0GHz and then 3.0GHz unfortunately it did not matter at that point cause today it's all about cores and pathways.
Who did make the first possible 4GHz reachable CPU?
tsamprasxx is offline


Old 08-08-2009, 06:06 PM   #19
JonnTEN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Intels P4 did it quite early on, just that it was 4Ghz of not getting much.
JonnTEN is offline


Old 08-08-2009, 06:11 PM   #20
AdobebePhoto

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Who did make the first possible 4GHz reachable CPU?
Intel of course.

Even Prescocks could break 4Ghz easy but due to its enoumous heat it required VPC cooling. Here's mine under VPC. That chip was such a scorching POS.

AdobebePhoto is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity