LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-14-2009, 07:19 PM   #1
wJswn5l3

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default Pelosi going to war with CIA
Let the leaks from CIA begin...
wJswn5l3 is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 11:05 PM   #2
mymnarorump

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
653
Senior Member
Default
May I suggest that they leak these two memos first?

The Obama administration has turned down former Vice President Dick Cheney’s request for the declassification of two CIA reports on the effectiveness of the Agency’s detainee program, THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned. A letter dated May 7, 2009, from the CIA’s Information and Privacy Coordinator, Delores M. Nelson, rejected Cheney’s request because the documents he has requested are involved in a Freedom of Information Act court battle.

“In researching the information in question, we have discovered that it is currently the subject of pending FOIA litigation (Bloche v. Department of Defense, Amnesty International v. Central Intelligence Agency). Therefore, the document is excluded from Mandatory Declassification Review,” Nelson wrote in the letter to the National Archives, the agency responsible for handling Cheney’s request.

The rejection of Cheney’s request will almost certainly intensify the public back-and-forth between the former vice president and the current administration. The contentious debate over enhanced interrogation exploded on April 16, when Obama authorized the release of four memos on interrogation prepared by the Bush Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. In a statement accompanying the release, Obama pointed to “exceptional circumstances” surrounding the memos that required their declassification and release. Four days later, in an interview on Fox News, Cheney revealed that he had requested the declassification of two memos that demonstrate that the techniques were effective.

White House officials have told reporters and members of Congress that the Cheney memos do not bolster the case for enhanced interrogation, as Cheney has suggested. But they have nonetheless refused to release them. President Obama has the legal authority to declassify the documents “with the wave of his hand,” according to one expert.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblog...est_denied.asp
mymnarorump is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 11:08 PM   #3
Nurba

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
That ought to clean out a good chunk of the Dem leadership. Like I said, win-win

-Arrian
Nurba is offline


Old 05-15-2009, 04:26 AM   #4
ReginaPerss

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Screw Afghanistan. We need the CIA watching Pakistan and its nukes right now...
ReginaPerss is offline


Old 05-15-2009, 11:33 AM   #5
alenbarbaf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Screw Afghanistan. We need the CIA watching Pakistan and its nukes right now...
Pakistan was incorporated in my reference to Afghanistan.
alenbarbaf is offline


Old 05-15-2009, 04:28 PM   #6
connandoilee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
just saw Cheney's being implicated in trying to have some Iraqi officer waterboarded because, or so he could link Saddam to OBL/AQ

thats a POW, and the guy was cooperating. The people in charge of him refused the VP's "suggestion".

hmm...
next revelation... Cheney waterboarded terrorists after the shooting incident to relieve stress
connandoilee is offline


Old 05-16-2009, 01:54 AM   #7
SNUfR8uI

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Weren't you the one who was skeptical of the power the CIA has to destroy politicians that cross it? You're about to get an object lesson...
SNUfR8uI is offline


Old 05-16-2009, 02:09 AM   #8
Gozmand

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
I still am, and she ain't going nowhere.

We'll see...
Gozmand is offline


Old 05-16-2009, 04:05 AM   #9
Keyclenef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Panetta's an old hand. I keep forgetting how much he's been around town.

Competent response.
Keyclenef is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity