General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
i just watched a documentary "claiming" that it was an insurance scam, it wasnt even the titanic that sunk it was her almost identical sister ship which had previously been damaged, so they swaped them so they could get the insurance for it or something like that blah de blah
was well dull and not very interesting, not one alien mentioned |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
If the Titanic had only reversed her engines, not turned to port and slammed head-on with the iceberg, would she still have sunk?
Could the Titanic have survived even if her entire bow was anihillated by the collision with the iceberg? (The Titanic sank because her starboard side was slashed by the contact with the iceberg. Too many compartments were flooded - 5 vs max. 4 - and water overflowed the bulkheads, dooming the 'unsinkable' ship.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
I heard a few years ago that the Titanic would have been much better off had it hit the iceberg directly instead of scraping the apparent sides of it.
It either would have stayed afloat much, much longer or could have limped to the closest port in Newfoundland. Then there's stories like these which raise even more questions all these years later. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...e-Titanic.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I believe the ship attempted to turn port side to avoid the ice burg but was unable to.....They also set there engines to well I suppose High in an attempt to make the ship turn faster.....[thumbdown]
http://www2.sptimes.com/titanic/How_did_sink.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|