Yyaqyped |
10-10-2008 01:52 AM |
That's a Blu-ray disc, though. But yeah, it's awesome and shows how long this format could last.
To answer your question, nothing is replacing 1080p any time soon(and by 'soon' i mean 15 years minimum). A higher resolution simply isn't necessarily by ANY means of the imagination. The difference between 1080p and 4k would be negligible at best on any screen under ~160". Hell, even some people today say they can't even see the difference between 480i and 1080p(i think they're nuts, but yeah). It's the law of diminishing returns.
Look how long standard 4:3 480i TVs were around. It took 50 years just to finally get to 1080p. And again, with the law of diminishing returns, people will be much more resilient to 'upgrade' again, especially with no real palpable benefits.
And look how long it took just for TVs to go totally digital! In fact, we aren't even there yet(not til feb 09). Also, currently cable and Sattelite HD is only in 1080i, and only in a very limited number of channels, with severe compression and sub par 5.1 sound quality at that. Seriously, the video compression on these broadcasts are just terrible, there's SUCH a long way to go before there's enough bandwidth to eliminate most of the compression... Not to mention years from now when 1080p is actually available on Cable/Satellite.
So my point is, normal cabl/sat HDTV isn't even at 50% of what blu-ray is right now(zero viewable compression on the best discs, and completely uncompressed surround sound).
So get used to it folks. 1080p and BD will be around for a long time.
|