General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
That looks beautifull, not only that but it looks like it could steer to ( which is more then most of the cars posted in this thread, my own submission included.. ). ![]() Edit: Here is a bit on the car http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_Daytona |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
If that where true they would push up that limit 3mph to reclaim the 'fastest production car' label, right? Not that it means much to me, just can imagine it to be a nice sales slogan ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
My favourite is without a doubt, the Dodge Charger. Brilliant looking thing, and even better when their beefed up such as this beuty!!
http://www.peom.se/images/060416_Elm...harger-70A.JPG |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
I've got a feeling the Veyron is a bit better to drive at top speed than the Viper. Besides, I wouldn't call a tuned Viper a production model... Face the fact - that Viper is simply no achievement like the Veyron is, which is built from the ground up to be solid at top speed, drive you in comfort and luxury and handle well around a track even when it nearly weighs two tonnes. I'd have a Veyron anyday. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Exactly. It's a tuner car - not a production car and apparantly less than a dozen are made. You simply can't call it the fastest production car ever made compared to the Veyron. And like 300 is a "production" number anyways. You shouldn't even be able to claim that unless you're making more than several thousand of a model. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
I've got a feeling the Veyron is a bit better to drive at top speed than the Viper. Besides, I wouldn't call a tuned Viper a production model... ![]() Exactly. It's a tuner car - not a production car and apparantly less than a dozen are made. You simply can't call it the fastest production car ever made compared to the Veyron. ![]() You can have your $1,440,800 "achievement". I'll take the $225,000 monster that beats it and buy 20 more cars and a fully furnished house. Ow and to be honest, since I wouldn't even be able imagine being able to pay for the veyron, and the alternative is priced allot lower... Well it's not actually competition either, with the Veyron you could do groceries without problems, and it's a pretty practical car considering it's price segment ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
I would agree on that assumptiom but I would love to know for sure Neither can the slightly modified stock SRT-10, which won the 2004 and 2006 Formula D Championship. Neither can the previous gen's GTSR's (yes I know they have different suspension setups) which won at Le Mans in the GT2 class in 98 and 99. Also won the GT2 manufacturer's world championship every year from 98-02. But yeah you're right, they suck at handling... ![]() I would hope a car that costs almost six times what the 1000 costs would beat it on a road course. I would hate to have wasted all that money to not be the best. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
So many to choose from. Charger, Stingray, Many mustangs.
But Ive always liked the Mach I looks: Looks good ________ Mermaid ________ The Vision Condo Pattaya |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
Funny... it seems to wipe the floor with everything thrown at it every year on every magazine (C&D, MT to list a few) and wins the road course test every time. Yeah, it can't turn worth ****... |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Tuned Veyron anyone ? What I find hilarious is the fact that they even have to bring in a Veyron into this discussion to make their comparison competitive. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|