LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-15-2012, 12:05 AM   #1
cingularring

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default Duchess' boobs
I'd rather see her sisters. That said, it seems to me they have no case as far as suing. She was in the open. Just because the nearest road is 1 mile away doesn't mean no one can see you. They keep saying that because the photo's are 'intimate', that it breaks privacy laws. Doesn't look any more intimate than what I have seen on the French coast... and no one gets sued for taking topless beach pics there.

Those pics were worth, what? $1-5m? Common sense says if you don't want your boobs in the paper, don't let em free outside. Meh.
cingularring is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 12:07 AM   #2
ZX3URrBH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
I didn't see any boobs.
ZX3URrBH is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 12:12 AM   #3
cingularring

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
I didn't see any boobs.
I bet if you search Kate Middleton topless in google images you will. Shrug, not too impressive, though. If they weren't future queen boobs, no one would care.
cingularring is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 12:31 AM   #4
ZX3URrBH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
I bet if you search Kate Middleton topless in google images you will. Shrug, not too impressive, though. If they weren't future queen boobs, no one would care.
Yes, I saw them, that's what I meant.

I didn't see any boobs.
ZX3URrBH is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 12:31 AM   #5
SueveDobe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
These are not the boobs you are looking for.
SueveDobe is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 02:04 AM   #6
whatisthebluepill

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
They keep saying that because the photo's are 'intimate', that it breaks privacy laws. Doesn't look any more intimate than what I have seen on the French coast... and no one gets sued for taking topless beach pics there.
I think the difference is that she was in a private property. It wasn't out in public.
whatisthebluepill is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 04:36 AM   #7
wllsqyuipknczx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
super grainy pictures of boobs, im better off going to xvideos and searching for Angela Crystal.
wllsqyuipknczx is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 05:39 AM   #8
r5YOPDyk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Those are the sort of thing I wanked to when using the net in 1997
r5YOPDyk is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 01:31 PM   #9
Elelaytet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
Those are the sort of thing I wanked to when using the net in 1997
I have fairly lax standards when it comes to women, but Kate is subpar. She is not going to age well.
Elelaytet is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 02:38 PM   #10
oplapofffe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Makes me laugh when guys on the net talk about boobs not being impressive.

I wonder how many girls would look impressive from such poor quality photo's, her bum looks nice though



To the question of privacy, well I'll swap places with the prince if he doesn't like it!
oplapofffe is offline


Old 09-15-2012, 02:45 PM   #11
CIAFreeAgent

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
671
Senior Member
Default
Makes me laugh when guys on the net talk about boobs not being impressive.
Newb, gettin all impressed over just any old pair.
CIAFreeAgent is offline


Old 09-17-2012, 03:35 AM   #12
allvideO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
665
Senior Member
Default
she's got terrible tits, the French paparazzi should sue her
allvideO is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity