[minowz]

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/ma...omputer-t.html "Two participants Dorothy Gilmartin, a instructor with her hair tied back in a, and Alison Kolani, a editor furrowed their brows in concentration. Who'd function as the first to answer? Neither, because it ended up. Both were crushed to the buzzer by the 3rd combatant: Watson, a supercomputer. Going back 3 years, I.B.M. scientists have now been creating what they assume would be the world's innovative 'question addressing' device, in a position to comprehend a question asked in every day human elocution 'organic language,' as pc scientists call it and react with an exact, informative response. Quite simply, it should do significantly more than what search-engines like Google and Bing do, where you could find the clear answer that will be simply indicate a record. It's to pick out the right solution it self. Since it allows devices to talk more obviously with people, allowing us ask questions in the place of writing keywords, technologists have long considered this type of artificial intelligence as an ultimate goal. University boffins and pc software companies have created question-answering systems for a long time, but these have mainly been restricted to merely phrased questions. No body actually handled 'Jeopardy'! The hints are allusive and too perplexing since specialists thought that even for the most recent artificial intelligence, the overall game was just too hard:, and the width of trivia is too wide..."