[TZtrDuso]

When I wrote a few years ago....."The US will discover itself isolated due to the state of Israel and at these times the "Jews" wil lfind another "friend."................here may be the beginning. ================================================== ====== America's developing solitude -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Alan Hart 22 December 2011 Alan Hart views the increasing international isolation of america because unconditional help of Israel, as demonstrated in the current condemnation by 'all the local and political groups on the UN Security Council' of Israeli settlement actions and settler violence. An extended heading might have added what due to President Obama's grovelling for Jewish plan financing and votes. On 19 December, in the Jewish Daily Forward, Josh Nathan-Kazis wrote this: Top-level Jewish fundraisers from President Obama's 2008 strategy are staying with the leader in 2012. Despite reports that President Obama faces a lack of Jewish funders because of his Middle East coverage, analysis of a summary of elite bundlers from his 2008 race shows no defections one of the president's top Jewish followers in 2012. That's bad information for the would-be presidents on the Republican side who're grovelling for Jewish campaign funds and votes. World disapproval On exactly the same time, in what the BBC's Barbara Plett called 'a very unusual move', all of the local and political groups on the UN Security Council dramatically criticized Israeli settlement activities. They said within their claims that 'extended negotiation building threatened the likelihood of another Palestinian state.' Dismay was also expressed by them at increasing settler violence. (' They' were the envoys representing europe, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Arab Group and a loose coalition of rising states referred to as IBSA, or India, Brazil, South Africa.) 'Despite the unanimity of opinions, the envoys didn't attempt to write just one Security Council statement simply because they believed the UNITED STATES could veto it.' Barbara Plett, BBC reporter It had been UK Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant who browse the record of the EU team. Israel's ongoing notices to increase the building of agreements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem (,1000 new housing units tendered for the other day), deliver a damaging message. We genuinely believe that Israel's security and the conclusion of the Palestinians' to statehood aren't other objectives. They're mutually reinforcing goals on the other hand. While settler abuse and settlement building remains however they won't be performed. As Barbara Plett mentioned, 'Regardless of the unanimity of opinions, the envoys didn't attempt to write just one Security Council statement simply because they believed the UNITED STATES could veto it.' She also mentioned that the Obama administration's position was that 'something related to Israeli-Palestinian peace talks goes in a US-led bilateral procedure, perhaps not at the UN.' (For me that's hypocrisy of the greatest order.) It may be said, and I actually do say, that such criticism of Israel's settlement actions is 44 years too late. What exactly, actually, is its importance? My response is in three areas. The very first is that it's a powerful indicator of America's increasing isolation due to the Obama administration's unconditional support for Zionism's monster son or daughter. The 2nd, connected, is that it appears to verify what I've been saying and writing for many months that behind closed doors just about all of the governments of the planet, European governments particularly, are far more than frustrated with Israel's contempt for and defiance of international law. The next is that the authorities of many of the member states of the UN came to terms with the fact that Zionism's record that a state on the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip could and could pose a danger to Israel's existence is propaganda rubbish of the greatest order. since the two-state solution is definitely dead or even yet buried.) (This, obviously, is just of academic interest When I'm considering Obama's grovelling, my memory recalls a remark designed to me by Dr. Hajo Meyer, the enthusiastic anti-Zionist Nazi holocaust survivor and writer of An Ethical Tradition Betrayed: The Finish of Judaism. We'd provided a system in London and over breakfast the next day I asked him a question. I said: 'Hajo, you're well into your eighties and you're being vilified by Zionism's spoken hit-men for the efforts to unmask the Zionist beast. Why have you been continuing together with your truth-telling? Why don't you relax in peace and quiet and enjoy what's left of one's life'? He responded with eight small words. 'The first person I see each and every morning is me,' meaning 'I've to reside with myself.' It's significantly more than fair to think that Obama appears in the mirror from time to time. If he is able to deal with herself I wonder. Israel's reaction Israel's reaction as sent by Karean Peretz, speaker for Israel's UN objective, involved this: 'The primary obstacle to peace, has been, and remains, the Palestinians' claim to the alleged right of reunite and its refusal to identify Israel as a Jewish state.' That, also, is Zionist propaganda rubbish of the greatest order. Israel isn't a Jewish state. When in regards to a quarter of its people are Arabs and primarily Muslims how can it be? After it'd turned to your final round of ethnic cleansing Israel can only be considered a Jewish state. Israel is just a Zionist state. Since the late Palestinian chief Yasser Arafat kept them informed via a key route, Israel's leaders have long recognized that in the function of a solution, the Palestine Liberation Organization was grudgingly reconciled to the truth of the right of return being limited to the place of the Palestinian state, which would suggest that no more than 100,000 refugees would find a way to return, with the rest needing to take economic compensation for the reduction the robbery of these property and rights. Arafat and his management colleagues got a diploma of comfort from two expectations, when i describe in my own book Zionism: The Actual Enemy of the Jews, when they decided they'd no option but to be practical. One was that Palestinian refugees everywhere could and might have a Palestinian passport. Another was when there was a two-state solution, it might develop over one or two decades in to one state for several i.e. since in peace and relationship enough Israeli Jews could say anything like: 'We don't require two states.' In case of a one-state answer coming about by common agreement, it had been thought on the Palestinian area at management level that, with time, all Palestinians who wanted to return could be in a position to return. Therefore, theoretically the two-state solution wasn't always the end-game on the best of reunite. http://www.redress.cc/americas/ahart20111222