[kmjbbT3U]

More publicity can equal higher popularity. Not that amazing. And to FOX, if there's no real race, there's no news. It's in FOX's best interest to keep people believing that it's not a done deal yet. I do wish there was more time spend on some of the other more rational candidates.

[nvmrfgopyy]

No, it's a bit slanted.

But if you want coverage of the candidates, FOX covers them more than the other networks. So as much as I'm not a fan of FOX, there's really not a lot of variety available else where.

[JakeBarkings]

I don't go there for their science coverage. (unless I'm really in need of a good laugh, or just want to see what the wackos are currently spewing.)

And almost all news outlets have their own subtle brand of bias. FOX doesn't quite get the subtle part.

[9wQlZkIj]

I don't think it's as bad as that. Some stories are OK. The local Chicago outlet is fine on local stories. (which is what I normally see when I watch FOX) I don't tune in the national coverage often. Just a bit more lately due to their coverage on the candidates. But no, I won't defend the national feed.

[ZESINTERS]

That's usually the case. Not all the stories are that bad, but FOX does mostly deserve the crap it takes.

[Orefsmisits]

Fox has seen the light and agrees Obama's the ONE.

[tropicana]

I think there's a mistake in that graphic. When's the last time Santorum got more than 4% in a poll?

[allachakb]

No it doesnt. I love how picking anyone but the bottom 2 repubs to win the nom is 1 like10% return at any given time.

[XU8i6ysK]

This election is the Republicans to lose given how unemployment is still high. The good news is the Republicans seem hell bent on losing this election. That's good for America and good for the world given how batshit insane the current crop of Republicans are.