LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-24-2012, 05:22 PM   #1
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default Umpteenth shootout in the US, this time near New York's Empire State building
Poeetiol is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 05:28 PM   #2
tilmprarnerit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
Allow me to provide a summary of what this thread will turn into:

GunLover: "There aren't enough guns on the street, someone could have shot the gunman and prevented this tragedy!"
Liberal: "There are too many guns on the Street! If No one had guns then there wouldn't be shootings!"
GunLover: "There are already guns out there, you can't get them all back, if you tried only criminals would have guns"
Brit: "It worked in England"
GunLover: "This is the ****ing United States of America! We're better!"
Chris Rock: "We need a tax on bullets, make it too expensive to go shooting up places"
GunLover: "Besides, there aren't that many gun deaths, just look at Fairfax county, Virginia"
Liberal: "What about Washington D.C. though?"
Troll: "And especially Chicago, they kill each other every day there. Where are the Chicago Poly members so I can rub this in their faces?"

"Sissy!"
"Gay!"
"Stupid Canadian!"
"*******!"
"Fag!"


And then we all wait for the next thread.
tilmprarnerit is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 05:35 PM   #3
gabbaman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
internet-memes-if-guns-dont-kill-people-people-kill-people-does-that-mean-toasters-dont-toast-to.jpg
gabbaman is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 05:55 PM   #4
didrexx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
Who toasts toast?
didrexx is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 06:14 PM   #5
Bxbhtjnr

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
347
Senior Member
Default
But I thought that New York City had all those sensible gun laws you guys supported. Bloomberg is the most virulent enemy of the 2nd Amendment now in office.
Bxbhtjnr is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 07:22 PM   #6
Wluwsdtn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
596
Senior Member
Default
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19372533
So what are US policy makers going to do about this random violence do you think?
Encourage it. It's good for business and voters like it too, so more is better, right?

Noone even died here, proving once again that guns are safe.
Wluwsdtn is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:07 PM   #7
SergeyLisin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
But I thought that New York City had all those sensible gun laws you guys supported. Bloomberg is the most virulent enemy of the 2nd Amendment now in office.
Any sensible person will realize a single city (or even a single state) cannot effectively enact gun control.

I'm sure you know this, but let's start to be intellectually honest here, okay?

This isn't targeted at you in particular, but at the several posters in this thread who have all made the same patently absurd argument.
SergeyLisin is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:21 PM   #8
vNQmO2BF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
THE WHOLE GODDAMN STATE has strict gun laws.
If you would care to read my post again...I mentioned states cannot even do it.

Unless your state boundaries are equivalent to national boundaries, it just means you go to another state to buy your ****.

As for a reasonable argument...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle4496590/

Nine others were hit by gunfire. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said that some of the victims may have been hit by police bullets. The victims are expected to survive.

Can you imagine the chaos if this was in some redneck town like Houston? All of those heroes carrying guns, firing off at "the shooter" and hitting far more innocents than even the trained police officers did here.

That would've been a sight to see.
vNQmO2BF is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:29 PM   #9
AAAESLLESO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
To add: concealed carry permit holders statistically have a dramatically lower frequency of homicide than the general population. That include justifiable homicide i.e. defensive gunfire.
AAAESLLESO is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:30 PM   #10
bomondus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Americans are too fat to use weapons other then guns -



Also, Americans can only be brought down by high caliber weapons.
bomondus is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:31 PM   #11
MasTaBlau

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
We knew that already. You give a gun to a Canadian and he puts it on the shelf. Give a gun to an American and he goes out and shoots people. It's all in the culture. Americans are uncivilized barbarians and that is all there is to it.

While we knew that already, it does not hurt to repeat this point, people on this site are forgetful.
MasTaBlau is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:39 PM   #12
pXss8cyx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
"If they'd rather die then perhaps they had better do so and decrease the surplus population."
pXss8cyx is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:40 PM   #13
mGUuZRyA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
How often does Canada do border stops? Maybe slightly more often than the NY state police. But not enough to make it terribly difficult to run some guns...
mGUuZRyA is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:44 PM   #14
flnastyax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
How did this guy get a gun? If some failure like him can get one, it's probably not all that hard.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmont...umgartner.html

(I'll save you some trouble and tell you that it's probably originally from Montana.)

EDIT: Are armored car guards in Canada typically armed? They are in some parts of the US but I don't think they would be in Edmonton, Alberta.


He used his service weapon. It was not his personal gun. Yes, armored car guards are armed.
flnastyax is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 08:55 PM   #15
Lolita Palmer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
Given the fun stories I've heard about US border crossing, I suspect some people change their minds on that question during the process...
Lolita Palmer is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 09:04 PM   #16
Scukonaher

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Yes, just like when you enter the United States, they ask if it is your intent to commit any acts of terrorism. The idea that this would stop actual terrorists is laughable at best.
No one said it does. But you wouldn't believe how many Americans answer "yes" to the gun possession question and are turned away.

To be clear, I'm not saying guns are not smuggled across the border. They are. It's just a helluva lot more effective than a state border is at preventing smuggling.
Scukonaher is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 09:10 PM   #17
mikeyyuiok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
That's just because there are too many cowardly democrats not packing heat, and because Republicans only pull guns on people when victory is assured (which extends to US national security policy).
"Fight only when victory is assured"

Yep, that's definately poor policy, right there.
mikeyyuiok is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 09:33 PM   #18
Quonuttott

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Umm, that lasted a whopping nine months. Or are you suggesting the return of the liberals was the victory?
Quonuttott is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 09:42 PM   #19
StitsVobsaith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Good lord, you all have a clause in your constitution saying that Parliament can override your fundamental rights simply by saying they want to? You sure you don't want guns?
StitsVobsaith is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 11:07 PM   #20
Aozenee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Glad you understand, Mrfun.
Aozenee is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity