General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I'll make a post, and a statement on this.
My company was one of them lost on the bridge contract here in CA, in this film. I'll tell you this. American's built the first bridge, back in the 1930's, using nothing but bolts, nuts, slide rules....it took American's 18 months. Today, our bridge sections are built in China, shipped here, and assembled like legos.... 10 years. We will have been working on this damn bridge. Give me those American's with those slide rules again. It's BS media propoganda that American's can't get the job done. We did, politics took it away from us. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Just because someone was employed in Ahmurrkuh does not entitle him to a similar position in perpetuity. Given the poor quality of Ahmurrkin goods, including food, I am more than happy to purchase those made overseas, and if bridges can be made in a manner that resembles importation from China, so much the better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Just because someone was employed in Ahmurrkuh does not entitle him to a similar position in perpetuity. Given the poor quality of Ahmurrkin goods, including food, I am more than happy to purchase those made overseas, and if bridges can be made in a manner that resembles importation from China, so much the better. The reason "American" goods are of poor construction is because foreigners (like the ones who issue dollars out of thin air) own the companies who produce them. What seems to bypass people of your mindset is how things got from where they were to where they are today. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
The reason "American" goods are of poor construction is because foreigners (like the ones who issue dollars out of thin air) own the companies who produce them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
If poor quality is attributable to foreign ownership and assuming for the sake of argument you are correct, would not the foreign companies, also owned by foreigners, be producing equally poor if not worse products? |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Yes, both would be poor. There are three issues here, loss of jobs, foreign ownership and poor quality, none good for Americans. I see three issues too: -regulation causing deadweight loss, preventing a reallocation of labour -hindrance of the movement and deployment of capital -a lack of competition, caused by said regulation There is a fourth - what business does a regime have building bridges with stolen money? |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Yet plainly, foreign goods are superior, thus your attribution is bunk. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Yet plainly, foreign goods are superior, thus your attribution is bunk. I see three issues too: -regulation causing deadweight loss, preventing a reallocation of labour Domestic manufacturers had to comply when foreigners did not. -hindrance of the movement and deployment of capital -a lack of competition, caused by said regulation Libertarian propaganda designed to manufacture our consent for world government. There is a fourth - what business does a regime have building bridges with stolen money? That has nothing to do with borders, fiat is international. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
What foreign goods are superior? Japanese vehicles were superior for a while (using our technology globalists gave them), but the international globalist tribe took over those corporations and incorporated planned in obsolesence into their manufacturing and now they're just as bad as everything else. Domestic manufacturers had to comply when foreigners did not. Libertarian propaganda designed to manufacture our consent for world government.That has nothing to do with borders, fiat is international. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|