DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/)
-   -   And Romney's VP is.... (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/49338-romneys-vp.html)

Ruiceara 07-31-2012 08:16 PM

And Romney's VP is....
 
Why doesn't he just auction off the announcement to the highest paying news organization?

outdog 07-31-2012 08:20 PM

Sarah Palin has too much money.

giftbestcom 07-31-2012 08:24 PM

Quote:

****... Donald Trump
Damn, that one's much better http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

AlbrtJhnsqw 07-31-2012 08:26 PM

The Koch brothers would make excellent vice presidents, at least in terms of policies http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

apannamma 07-31-2012 09:09 PM

SWTOR takes place before Bane.

TZtrDuso 08-01-2012 06:30 AM

Quote:

I'm looking forward to Vice President Koch Industries. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/wink.gif
Corperations are people, so I think that would be OK. Koch Industries was founded founded in 1927 in Kansas, so its old enough... and it is an oil supply co.

Britfunclubs 08-01-2012 08:09 AM

Quote:

****... Donald Trump
The Donald does not play second fiddle to anyone.

RBJamez 08-02-2012 02:06 AM

I'm looking forward to visiting the White House Hotel & Casino

GypeFeeshyTes 08-02-2012 02:25 AM

I'd like to see Madonna in the role, even she can't be any more wooden than Mitt.

Bxbhtjnr 08-04-2012 03:24 PM

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif

flielagit 08-04-2012 04:52 PM

Around the time they stopped giving the Veep slot to the 2nd place finisher in the general election.

ExelePlavisseu 08-04-2012 06:28 PM

...because the VP isn't gimped enough?

xsexymasterix 08-05-2012 12:46 AM

Quote:

I think it would change the election process more than it would change what actually happens during the winner's term. It might make for less angry campaigns. But now I'm thinking back on recent primary campaigns and that seems like a silly thought. Obama and Clinton and Biden tore into each other during the primary, and now Biden and Clinton both serve Obama. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/dunno.gif
There's a reason why they abolished the rule in the first place.

sitescools 08-05-2012 03:37 AM

Quote:

Around the time they stopped giving the Veep slot to the 2nd place finisher in the general election.
When did that happen. I never really studied American history, but I seem to recall Lincoln appointed VPs of his choice, and that was about 150 years ago. JFK didn't have Nixon as a VP... though that would have been fun!

gydrorway 08-05-2012 04:41 AM

Also 1800. Aaron Burr actually received the same number of votes as Jefferson, but then the House of Representatives had to break the tie.

It wasn't until 1804 and the 12th Amendment when it was decided Electors had to delineate their vote between President and Vice President.

viagra-kaufen 08-05-2012 03:19 PM

Quote:

Also 1800. Aaron Burr actually received the same number of votes as Jefferson, but then the House of Representatives had to break the tie.

It wasn't until 1804 and the 12th Amendment when it was decided Electors had to delineate their vote between President and Vice President.
Oh. Well Aaron Burr was of the same party as Jefferson so it wasn't that big of a deal.

heilyprollecyspor 08-09-2012 09:28 PM

Well whoever he picks, it better be someone incredibly impressive. Latest polls show Obama leading by 7-9 points. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.gif

alfredtaniypnx 08-10-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Well whoever he picks, it better be someone incredibly impressive. Latest polls show Obama leading by 7-9 points. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.gif
http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif Was it PPP or one of the other dem firms? Gallup has had them essentially tied for months. All the movement has basically been noise--it's a turnout game, now, and Romney has way more money to spend on get-out-the-vote.

Trebbinsa 08-10-2012 02:05 PM

But what have they been showing previously? Every poll has outliers. If they have 45-45 for like 3 weeks and suddenly, without warning, it jumps to 49-41, that's probably just noise.

Ruiptuptubre 08-10-2012 02:58 PM

But they haven't been showing the same trend. Other polls have favored Romney.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2