LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-25-2012, 09:43 PM   #1
HoqCBYMl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default Bernie Sanders exposes billionaires who are buying US government.
When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators. - P. J. O'Rourke
HoqCBYMl is offline


Old 07-25-2012, 10:04 PM   #2
janeloveslifenow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
if they're giving $$$ in secret, how does Bernie know and why is he violating their privacy?
janeloveslifenow is offline


Old 07-25-2012, 11:02 PM   #3
bataovady

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
and why is he violating their privacy?
bataovady is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:21 AM   #4
anconueys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
Fag thread starter, have any of those billionaires changed your vote? Why not?
anconueys is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:37 AM   #5
aparneioninny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
Please don't call him that term. That's really bannable language.
I'd like to introduce you to Wiglaf. It seems you've never met him before.
aparneioninny is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:42 AM   #6
Justlovemy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
They prefer Queens.
Justlovemy is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:47 AM   #7
NETvoyne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
We have banned people for espousing racist views and using racist terminology. I would hope we would afford our homosexual posters the same respect to not be denigrated for their sexual orientation.
NETvoyne is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:57 AM   #8
AnypecekceS

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
554
Senior Member
Default
I think that orgy always had some sexual overtones attached to it.
The Online Etymology Dictionary says you are correct, sir.
AnypecekceS is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 01:01 AM   #9
MicoSiru

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
Explain to me the logic that allows slandering and denigrating people for their wealth and success but not their decision to stick their penis into another man's anus.
None of the rich people being denigrated post here?
MicoSiru is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 01:30 AM   #10
Angry White American

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
369
Senior Member
Default
MrFun exposes the fact that he prefers it when other people tell him what to think...
Angry White American is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 01:38 AM   #11
f29sXS07

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
MrFun, just stop. Please.
f29sXS07 is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 02:28 AM   #12
zU8KbeIU

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
367
Senior Member
Default
I hope you two will be very happy together. rosesmile.gif
They're already friends on Steam... oh la la
zU8KbeIU is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 02:36 AM   #13
Broker15015

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
They aren't buying the government. Idiot/lazy voters are selling their votes (absurdly, for the opportunity to watch inane and misleading ads), and in doing so giving government to the rich. The 99% definitely gets the government we deserve (in aggregate).
Broker15015 is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 05:30 AM   #14
Aswdwdfg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
We need more politicians like Bernie Sanders.
Socialists?
Aswdwdfg is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 07:56 AM   #15
Civilrecordzz

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
556
Senior Member
Default
A few weeks ago, I ready that fewer than 200 sources account for 90% of superPAC money for this year's election.
I have no idea if that's documented or apochryphal. But if true, it doesn't sound very democratic in a nation of 300 million individuals.
So what? All they're doing is helping politicians get their message out. It's still up to the voters to actually decide who to elect.
Civilrecordzz is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 08:52 AM   #16
perpelverw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Fag thread starter, have any of those billionaires changed your vote? Why not?
shaddup nigger, spic, or whatever you are this week
perpelverw is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 10:53 AM   #17
rojettafoxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
Intelligent, independent and forthright.
rojettafoxx is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 12:01 PM   #18
JulieSmithXIV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
It's amazing how an expensive education can still create such idiot children.

Everyone is susceptible to advertising and propaganda, and to think it's just the 'dumb' people displays a special level of stupidity. You think the worlds companies spent north of $450 billion dollars last year on advertising to just hit a small segment of stupid folks?
JulieSmithXIV is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 01:20 PM   #19
Butiqueso

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
It's amazing how an expensive education can still create such idiot children.

Everyone is susceptible to advertising and propaganda, and to think it's just the 'dumb' people displays a special level of stupidity. You think the worlds companies spent north of $450 billion dollars last year on advertising to just hit a small segment of stupid folks?
It's not that small of a segment unless you define it to be. "Stupid" is a relative term. You kinda gave up the right to a small grouping via definition as you want to include Kuci and HC in the "idiot" synonym group. So we can assume that roughly 95% to 99% of the population would also be idiots (or worse).

Not to mention that for an intelligent person there's a very large distinction between a commercial for a new product highlighting it's awesome features providing some incentive to try it out (reasonable)... and an attack ad convincing you that what you actually heard/read the person said was not what they said at all (completely unreasonable) ... or that it would even matter if it did happen that way.
Butiqueso is offline


Old 07-26-2012, 02:55 PM   #20
HQTheodore

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
It seems to me that the biggest problems with our country's democracy come from gerrymandering, the Electoral College, and excessive lobbyist influence. The idea that people who watch Fox News (or whatever) are being controlled is somewhat backwards IMO--people simply choose to watch things that confirm what they already believe.
HQTheodore is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity