DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/)
-   -   How would a rape/incest exception be implemented? (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/49766-how-would-rape-incest-exception-implemented.html)

DraidodaRip 05-17-2012 08:45 PM

Also, that they have free speech rights. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

allvideO 05-17-2012 11:00 PM

IIRC the majority of rapes go unreported, so that still leaves the majority of victims without the option of abortion. But that's probably the "best" option, yeah.

Oxzzlvpg 05-17-2012 11:51 PM

Quote:

Corporate personhood has nothing whatsoever to do with the moral notion of personhood. Corporate personhood is nothing more than saying "the corporation can enter into contracts as one entity, rather than forcing each individual shareholder to sign his name on every contract".
QFMFT. The liberal objection over "corporate personhood" is insane.

ViktorialHDY 05-18-2012 01:42 AM

Quote:

QFMFT. The liberal objection over "corporate personhood" is insane.
Claiming the right to free speech is violated if corporate "people" can't donate unlimited amounts of money to politicians is insane.

iNYZgxNC 05-18-2012 01:53 AM

From a pro-life perspective, how can one morally support an exception on any grounds other than life of the mother? Agreed. I don't understand this either. A child is a child. How the child was conceived doesn't change the status of the child.

Tw1anJOO 05-18-2012 02:00 AM

Quote:

How could we possibly know that, if they are unreported?

(genuinely curious here)
IIUC, they don't report it to the police, but will talk about it to studies/surveys/polls which promise confidentiality.

lierro 05-18-2012 02:08 AM

Quote:

Claiming the right to free speech is violated if corporate "people" can't donate unlimited amounts of money to politicians is insane.
The right to free speech is violated when the government can literally ban books.

LindaSmithIV 05-18-2012 02:27 AM

Quote:

From the perspective of a medical exam, a woman who was raped typically looks no different from any other woman.
I was going to say that you could look for trauma around the throat, but then I remembered Cheryl.

pavlik 05-18-2012 06:44 AM

Quote:

Sorry for the poorly worded digression, boys. I accept my beating.
Carry on.
Take this man to the infinite labyrinth of eternal ice.

Galinastva 05-18-2012 07:11 AM

If corporations are people then they should pay the same tax rates as people. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

If they want to admit they're not people then they can continue essentially paying zero net taxes.

TEFSADDERFISA 05-18-2012 03:27 PM

The lower half of them fail and cease to exist...
JM

Nypbscao 05-19-2012 02:15 AM

Idiot. What do you called pubic hair, mental trauma, strangulation, hickeys, semen, bruises, torn vaginas? It's not lupus that's for god damn sure. It's RAPE.

pipitous 05-19-2012 06:33 AM

Quote:

Idiot. What do you called pubic hair, mental trauma, strangulation, hickeys, semen, bruises, torn vaginas? It's not lupus that's for god damn sure. It's RAPE.
Rough concensual sex.

Gooracouppy 05-19-2012 01:35 PM

Quote:

The law concerning the Citizens United decision was used to prevent the promotion of a film which was critical of a sitting senator (Hillary Clinton). How's that for insanity?
I genuinely don't get why people here think Citizens United was a good thing. Is it just because it'll lead to more money being spent on Republican campaigning than Democrat? Is it really worth selling your souls for a few more attack ads?

Evoncalabbalo 05-19-2012 02:05 PM

Citizens United also prevented large scale damage to the democracy by prohibiting Congress from suppressing political speech in media --- including the blogs, websites, newspapers, and magazines that you jerk off to --- but let's not get bogged down in logic or reality and just scream partisanship and corruption. You are so stupid it is hard to imagine.

pharmablogger 05-19-2012 07:01 PM

Quote:

I genuinely don't get why people here think Citizens United was a good thing. Is it just because it'll lead to more money being spent on Republican campaigning than Democrat? Is it really worth selling your souls for a few more attack ads?
Some of us are rather big fans of the First Amendment.

Roneyslelry 05-19-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Citizens United also prevented large scale damage to the democracy by prohibiting Congress from suppressing political speech in media --- including the blogs, websites, newspapers, and magazines that you jerk off to --- but let's not get bogged down in logic or reality and just scream partisanship and corruption. You are so stupid it is hard to imagine.
Our democracy wouldn't have suffered large scale damage from shadowy millionaires not being able to run attack ads against candidates they oppose during election campaigns.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2