LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-10-2011, 04:26 PM   #1
socialkiiii

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default Wisconsin Democrats fail to take state Senate
And the Republicans control the redistricting there, so they can continue to punish the dems.

Unfortunately the Dems are in control of redistricting in Illinois and have really punished the Repugs here.
socialkiiii is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:18 PM   #2
zCLadw3R

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default
It seems voter suppression really does work.
zCLadw3R is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:24 PM   #3
Cd9JfGHR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Not at all. If there isn't evidence of wide spread voter suppression, as we've seen during this special election, then no one would make the claim but when there has been wide spread voter suppression efforts, as in this case, then it's reasonable to talk about it.
Cd9JfGHR is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:32 PM   #4
AbraroLib

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Unbelievable sore losers...

The turnout was near that of the midterms. Give me a break.
AbraroLib is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:34 PM   #5
Mjxhnapi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
That's hardly exclusive to Illinois.
Not every state has godawful gerrymandering. Redistricting is actually reasonably fair here in Virginia.

And case in point for illinois: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinoi...ional_district
Mjxhnapi is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:37 PM   #6
Eunatis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
Democrats have their own dirty tricks but voter suppression isn't one of them, mainly because higher voter turn out is almost ALWAYS favorable for a Democratic candidate, so it's retarded to say I don't accuses Democrats of something they are highly unlikely to ever do (simply for partisan reasons if nothing else).
Eunatis is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:45 PM   #7
PhilipBartew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
Yes, Al Gore, the sore loser who conceded the most important election of his life to his opponent for the good of the democratic process.
I think you're thinking of someone else. He was such a sore loser he decided to make a whole movie about how much of a sore loser he was, then they gave him the Nobel Peace Prize for it.
PhilipBartew is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 05:58 PM   #8
aceriscoolon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure most of his posts must be trolls.
aceriscoolon is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:00 PM   #9
plogypeskelry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
355
Senior Member
Default
I think you're thinking of someone else. He was such a sore loser he decided to make a whole movie about how much of a sore loser he was, then they gave him the Nobel Peace Prize for it.
Uhh actually the movie was about Global Warming. Did you see it?
plogypeskelry is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:02 PM   #10
SonicPs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Yes. That's why he spent the whole movie talking about global warming. He must be a sore loser if he's trying to do something else with his life.
SonicPs is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:06 PM   #11
Cibirrigmavog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
It's the very first thing he talks about, actually. "I used to be the next president of the United States". He then snipes at the Bush administration about a dozen times throughout the movie, for things ranging from the Secretary of Education to random people in the White House staff.
Cibirrigmavog is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:08 PM   #12
indartwm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Well he goes off on rants about tobacco and other irrelevant miscellany, so I think the movie really is all about Al Gore. Not whatever policy he's peddling.
indartwm is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:12 PM   #13
overavantstandard

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
It's the very first thing he talks about, actually. "I used to be the next president of the United States". He then snipes at the Bush administration about a dozen times throughout the movie, for things ranging from the Secretary of Education to random people in the White House staff.
Wow, he sniped at an administration for doing nothing about global warming in a movie he made about how he thinks something should be done about global warming. The only logical conclusion is he's a sore loser.
overavantstandard is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:14 PM   #14
CGH1KZzy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
Now we know he's trolling.
CGH1KZzy is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 06:15 PM   #15
maxtp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Anyway back to the topic of this thread: For people who don't know this was not a normal election but a recall election where a few politicians who got elected in 2010 so pissed off their constituents that hundreds of thousands signed petitions demanding they be immediately removed from office, thus the special recall election to see if that should happen and if the guy/gal is removed then who should take his place. It not surprising that most incumbents won (I.E. they were not recalled) most of the time but enough lost in the lower house that Republicans went from the majority to the minority while the state Senate had 6 senators facing recall (all Republicans); 3 kepts themselves in office (I.E. they were not recalled), two were removed from office and replaced by Democratic challengers, and one race is still being contested. That final contest will decide which party controls the state senate.
maxtp is offline


Old 08-11-2011, 03:52 AM   #16
ZonaPutaX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
I may be mistaken but don't the petitions have to be signed by constituents? So the recall elections were in fact requested by constituents?
ZonaPutaX is offline


Old 08-11-2011, 04:00 AM   #17
RussellPG

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
@ ben
RussellPG is offline


Old 08-11-2011, 04:40 AM   #18
CoenceLomneedtrue

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
and common sense.
CoenceLomneedtrue is offline


Old 08-11-2011, 04:53 AM   #19
Flankrene

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
325
Senior Member
Default
You really think the Wisconsin situation is an exercise in common sense?
Flankrene is offline


Old 08-11-2011, 04:54 AM   #20
KitRittyTug

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
I can objectively say both sides were ****ing morons and provided their electorate a glorious disservice.
KitRittyTug is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity