LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-03-2011, 09:24 PM   #1
courlerwele

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default Could the United States afoord to NOT have medicare/medicaid?
We would likely be thrown into a depression if Medicare ended tomorrow.
courlerwele is offline


Old 07-03-2011, 09:38 PM   #2
Thydaysuh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
The US would be better off if all medical care were free market.

Short run, it would hurt. Long run, Americans would be better off.
Thydaysuh is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 12:12 AM   #3
86GlSqSK

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
The US would be better off if all medical care were free market.

Short run, it would hurt. Long run, wealthy Americans would be better off.
fixed
86GlSqSK is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 12:18 PM   #4
Duseshoug

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
322
Senior Member
Default
The whole American medical system is rank insanity. Here in Korea things aren't perfect but the total health care spending (as a percentage of GDP) here is lower than American governmental health care spending and wait times for pretty much anything are shorter than America (for comparison purposes, Korea's system is a lot like Canada's but with better cost controls, people going to the doctor very often which helps with preventative medicine, much much much shorter wait times and very short doctor visits, which is the main downside of the Korean system)
Duseshoug is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 02:23 PM   #5
FelixQY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
Short run, it would hurt. Long run, wealthy Americans would be better off. As it is now, the present system is unsustainable. So your "choices" are to fix the system now or have no choice but to give up the system later.

Having Canada style healthcare is doubling down on a losing hand. You'll pay more for worse care, you'll see less, not more technology, your doctors and nurses will be paid less, you'll have longer waiting lists.

As it is now, the American system is superior in both access and care, even for those who aren't rich.
FelixQY is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 06:53 PM   #6
w4WBthjv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
The whole thing only cost about $30 dollars.
Wow!
w4WBthjv is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 08:31 PM   #7
adverwork

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
The whole American medical system is rank insanity. Here in Korea things aren't perfect but the total health care spending (as a percentage of GDP) here is lower than American governmental health care spending and wait times for pretty much anything are shorter than America (for comparison purposes, Korea's system is a lot like Canada's but with better cost controls, people going to the doctor very often which helps with preventative medicine, much much much shorter wait times and very short doctor visits, which is the main downside of the Korean system)
Sounds way better than what we currently have. I just don't know if it is wise to spend almost a quarter of our federal budget on our broke health care system. I would rather spend the same amount on preventative care for EVERY american instead of just normal care for the old. I know that over spending like we do now isn't wise.
adverwork is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 08:51 PM   #8
betraaaus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
While that's likely true (and additionally the abrupt end of any government support would engender a huge amount of suffering on the part of those with revealed medical conditions) this is, as I'm sure you're aware, insufficient criticism of any reasonable move toward a more plutocratic system...
fixed
betraaaus is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 09:37 PM   #9
chipkluchi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
fixed
Stop being an idiot. Or do you think of the market provision of food as "plutocratic"?
chipkluchi is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 09:44 PM   #10
SetSnonejog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
Stop being an idiot. Or do you think of the market provision of food as "plutocratic"?
MrFun would have to stop posting entirely to stop being an idiot. When was the last time he posted a thread and you thought "boy, this looks intelligent!"
SetSnonejog is offline


Old 07-04-2011, 10:58 PM   #11
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
glass houses etc.
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 01:57 AM   #12
Enalsebeerkawl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Stop being an idiot. Or do you think of the market provision of food as "plutocratic"?
Your post that I "fixed" for you, was in response to Medicare, not food distribution.
Enalsebeerkawl is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 02:59 AM   #13
hasasnn2345tv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
If by free market it is meant free of government influence, control, or intervention...

Food has been the subject of government intervention and management since before the nanny state. Even before the King was the state.
hasasnn2345tv is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 04:17 AM   #14
crumoursegemo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Public health care isn't perfect but when you look at charts like this: http://topforeignstocks.com/wp/wp-co...-per-cpita.PNG
It gets pretty hard to defend America's system. Plenty of countries with full public health care have governments that spend less on health care than America's government spends (let alone private health care). It'd surely be better to have a system like one of those and get more health coverage for less money.

The standard of care in Korea is somewhat lower than in America (mostly due to shorter doctor appointments) but when it costs less than a quarter as much per capita as has people visiting the doctor more often (so you get better preventative care since people don't wait until they're really sick before going to the doctor since it's so cheap so why not?) it makes claims that having a public health system means cost go up look pretty damn idiotic.

But then Ben is against public health care, so by the standards of Ben Is Always Wrong About Everything then it's a pretty open and shut case...
They spend less on healthcare because it isn't as available. For instance: The congo spends substantially less on healthcare than we do. I'd much rather have ours.

It seems pretty clear that the european healthcare system is basically lower cost due to rationing, which implies that their "savings" are actually just arbitrarily reduced availability. This is not a defense of their system, it is a damnation.
crumoursegemo is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 05:05 AM   #15
EvaQWmrm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
As opposed to our system, where our rationing is done according to the socioeconomic status of the recipient, which is also largely arbitrary.
There's very little rationing in the US healthcare system.
EvaQWmrm is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 05:43 AM   #16
Todilrdc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
1. Your point is factually inaccurate. Insurance companies can't deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, thanks to Obamacare.

2. Your point does nothing to prove that rationing in the US healthcare system is widespread.
Todilrdc is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 05:51 AM   #17
Evdokia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
If by free market it is meant free of government influence, control, or intervention...

Food has been the subject of government intervention and management since before the nanny state. Even before the King was the state.
Do you only deal in absolutes? The distortions in the market for food are far smaller than in the market for health care in the US. Moreover, I don't see many people yelling for direct government provision of food.
Evdokia is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 06:01 AM   #18
PaulRyansew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
No, but the enormous number of people without any form of health insurance might.

Many of those people are young, healthy individuals that don't want health insurance. That will also be solved by Obamacare, of course, as those individuals will be forced to purchase health insurance or face a penalty.
PaulRyansew is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 06:20 AM   #19
zoneouddy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Just wondering... When do we have to purchase health insurance? I was uninsurable from the time I was 18. Now I guess I have to pay for insurance that is never going to do me any good?

Is there an exception for people living outside the US, or am I going to be extradited and given AIDS for not having health insurance?
zoneouddy is offline


Old 07-05-2011, 06:34 AM   #20
Saduyre9de

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Thanks Drake

This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably.
Saduyre9de is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity