General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Someone please tell me how an organization who requires young men to spend two years converting others, one that bans caffeine for the most ridiculous reasons imaginable, one that has their own magic underwear to literally protect you from the evils of the world, is built upon the gospel of a "prophet", Joseph Smith...is not a cult?
Seriously, it's cult. There's no arguing it. As a side note, the mormon families I know give 10% of their income to the church. I don't know if this is mandated, but it's ****ing common and even more cultlike. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
That doesn't sound terribly different from Catholicism. Can't eat meat on Fridays for basically no reason. Go into a confessional and tell a priest you masturbate and you'll go to heaven. They aren't a cult.
Or Judaism--wear a special hat on your head, don't eat bacon or shrimp, do a community service project and have a bar mitzvah. Temple can cost hundreds of dollars. Not a cult. xpost |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
cult
–noun 1. a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies. 2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, especially as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult. 3. the object of such devotion. 4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc. 5. Sociology . a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols. All religions are cults. Own up to this fact and admit it. /me holds his rosary beads and crosses his heart |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
It's not manipulative if no one cares about or follows the rule. I know at least one person who has been excommunicated and shunned by his family, and that's a small sample set. I've not heard of anyone excommunicated who still had regular contact with their family... |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
All religions are nonsense. The difference with Mormonism (and Jehovah's Witness-ism and Scientology) is that they are such recent creations so their BS is so much more obvious. In 1000 years, Mormonism will be as respected as Catholicism is today.
![]() I am intrigued why the answer "Yes" in the poll is followed by "I'm an ignorant shithead". What's that about? |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
IIRC Mormonism got its start when Joseph Smith saw some stones, in which he "saw" words from God that no one else could see, then "transcribed" these into a manifesto manuscript that became the Book of Mormon. Jesus Christ himself appeared to him. He never made it to Utah, he was murdered by a mob in Carthage, Illinois. Brigham Young led them to Utah. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Some fact checking:
Homophobia. You got one right. Excommunication doesn't cut anyone off. The only difference is if you go to church (you can still go to church) you can't take the sacrament. If someone shunned their own family member, that would be against LDS doctrine. Exactly opposite of it in fact. Mormons aren't required to serve missions. Garments (the underwear) is not meant to literally protect a person from harm. There are some stories where it is claimed it did protect a person. It's not doctrine. They are simply to remind the wearer to follow the teachings of Christ without being obvious (like a nun's habit or priest's robe). Caffeine... true. You aren't supposed to drink caffeinated beverages. Almost everyone does. The stones were set into glasses to help with reading/translating. The actual content of the BoM was supposedly written on metal plates. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Some fact checking: Mormons aren't required to serve missions. Yes, they're "not required". ![]() If they're not required, how come every single mormon I've ever met has done them? They're technically "not required", I know, but you're leaving out the ramifications of not doing it. Garments (the underwear) is not meant to literally protect a person from harm. There are some stories where it is claimed it did protect a person. It's not doctrine. They are simply to remind the wearer to follow the teachings of Christ without being obvious (like a nun's habit or priest's robe). I've heard both, which to me implies it's left for the interpretation of the cultee. FWIW, Wiki says both. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
I grew up Mormon. I was still going to church in my late teens when a good share of my friends were going on their missions. I didn't serve a mission. I know (personally as life long friends and family) hundreds of Mormons (who are still in the church) who didn't serve missions, and many who were excommunicated as well (a good share of which are back in the Church... it's a temporary thing in most cases).
It's not some sort of shunning thing. Quite the opposite in fact. The vast majority of Mormons are going to end up trying to reconvert you by being sickeningly nice to you if you go apostate or stop attending Church. If you want to call that cult-like, then at least it's applicable, rather than factually incorrect nonsense derived from your amazingly in-depth research about one guy you met one time who's family (and Bishop) sound like douchebags who don't know what their religion teaches. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
FWIW, it wasn't one guy I met one time. I went to Jr High and up through 11th grade with him. He moved to Provo in the 12th grade, where all the fun happened. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|