LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-01-2012, 09:18 AM   #21
Bobdilan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
339
Senior Member
Default
No. Don't back down. You had him by the balls. Will doesn't even know who Ayn Rand is. And look what our most respected forefather had to say on the matter:

"William Perdikakis is a lying, sorry sack of sh*t." - Thomas Jefferson, 1805, Letter to Abigail C. Durrow, Richmond, Virginia
I may be a lot of things, but I am not a liar. Ok, Mr. D3 Master.
Bobdilan is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 09:25 AM   #22
awagsFare

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
I may be a lot of things, but I am not a liar. Ok, Mr. D3 Master.
"Verily, I'll tell you friend, not only is young master Sparafucil a gentleman and a scholar, but his Demon hunter will wreck your ****." - Thomas Paine, 1775
awagsFare is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 10:29 AM   #23
moopogyOvenny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
657
Senior Member
Default
If it was an all white school they wouldnt need IDs
moopogyOvenny is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 11:15 AM   #24
Kilsimpaile

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
If it was an all white school they wouldnt need IDs
It's not my fault non whites all look the same.[/sarcasm]

I try not to be racist, but young Latino and black males don't have statistics working in their favor. There are clearly socio-economic reasons for some of this, but the reality is that we have to be prejudice because life is short and not making logical assumptions when the outcome could harm you is just being naive.
Kilsimpaile is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 11:35 AM   #25
AOE6q4bu

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
This is a completely ridiculous move, and it's holding the door open for further erosion of privacy rights, that people think such things could ever be a good idea is simply disgusting and cowardly.


Some people are afraid of every and anything.
AOE6q4bu is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 01:20 PM   #26
12Cickprior

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
534
Senior Member
Default
It is a dumb move. It is 100% about money.
If they actually wanted to improve the school and keep kids in class, they would do things that would want them to be there.


I wonder what kind of info is on those chips. It is usually too much info. Would be awesome if there are some smart geek kids there that own the system.
12Cickprior is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 04:44 PM   #27
Squeernemergo

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Makes them sound like Ayn Rand.
Can you draw me a picture explaining that one?

time to read up:

http://www.amazon.com/Atlas-Shrugged...atlas+shrugged
Squeernemergo is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 04:50 PM   #28
Forex Autopilot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
This whole "invasions of privacy" thing is BS. They are schoolchildren at school; they don't get to have privacy, as far as their location is concerned. As for the school being able to track them outside of school, don't be silly. How any they going to do that?
Forex Autopilot is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 09:09 PM   #29
yespkorg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Paine was referring to English government and the ancien regime in France. In a democracy, the people are the government. This anti-government bullcrap is a modern invention.
Because certainly Jefferson would have supported an oppressive government that was first voted into power...

But I don't need to speak of facts. Your attempts to sound erudite are utterly defeated by your overwhelming desire to do so.
yespkorg is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 10:27 PM   #30
Dyslermergerb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
I think that long term this will indoctrinate people to become comfortable with the idea of RFID everywhere. Being the challenge accepted kind of dude I am, I want this tech - but not at the expense of indoctrinating our youths to grow accustomed to using it always.

I wonder what kind of info is on those chips. It is usually too much info. Would be awesome if there are some smart geek kids there that own the system.
Problem is, you'd have those really "smart geek kids" that think they own the system getting involved with savant hellion types who really do own the system - many lulz would ensue and tears would be shed as the "smart geek kids" became keen on suicide.
Dyslermergerb is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 10:33 PM   #31
JoZertekAdv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Because certainly Jefferson would have supported an oppressive government that was first voted into power... But I don't need to speak of facts. Your attempts to sound erudite are utterly defeated by your overwhelming desire to do so.
As I recall, you've posted several spurious quotations from Founding Fathers on here.

And yes, we all know Jefferson was a closet Randian. You must have really squandered your liberal arts education.

Your post quality has really declined of late, Gnius.
JoZertekAdv is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 10:35 PM   #32
riverakathy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Your post quality has really declined of late
riverakathy is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 10:36 PM   #33
AnetTeilor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
Pot meet kettle
Gimme a break. I had some choice material in this thread.
AnetTeilor is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 11:33 PM   #34
Unoloknovagog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
This whole "invasions of privacy" thing is BS. They are schoolchildren at school; they don't get to have privacy, as far as their location is concerned. As for the school being able to track them outside of school, don't be silly. How any they going to do that?
I don't think they would necessarily stop transmitting outside of school. It's open to abuse on by all kinds of people. Whether it's the students giving the tags to friends before disapperaing, the wrong staff getting access to kids whereabouts, other people being able to track kids outside to school. It just sounds like a way for someone to make money at the expense of others. If every school did this, a whole generation would be tracked. Do you think there might be a time when these tags are never removed?
Unoloknovagog is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 12:31 AM   #35
LeaderBiz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
I don't think they would necessarily stop transmitting outside of school.
If you watched the video, you'd have seen that is exactly what they do. You leave the building, you're off their radar.

I don't see an issue with students locations being tracked whilst on school premises, lots of large corporations have policies that mean staff have to wear name-tags, it's just a step forward from that. It's also a good way to almost instantly tell if there is a person on the premises who should not be there. The only thing i'd find annoying is the inconvenience of having that huge thing round my neck all day.
LeaderBiz is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 05:56 AM   #36
gluckmeea

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
If you watched the video, you'd have seen that is exactly what they do. You leave the building, you're off their radar.

I don't see an issue with students locations being tracked whilst on school premises, lots of large corporations have policies that mean staff have to wear name-tags, it's just a step forward from that. It's also a good way to almost instantly tell if there is a person on the premises who should not be there. The only thing i'd find annoying is the inconvenience of having that huge thing round my neck all day.
I did watch the video. He says they don't track them off campus, but that doesn't stop them from being tracked off campus does it?
gluckmeea is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 05:57 AM   #37
Eromereorybig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
I think that long term this will indoctrinate people to become comfortable with the idea of RFID everywhere. Being the challenge accepted kind of dude I am, I want this tech - but not at the expense of indoctrinating our youths to grow accustomed to using it always.
Pretty much this, except I don't really want the tech, but even less do I want people accepting such things.

We as a species have a bad track record with stuff like that though.
Eromereorybig is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 06:10 AM   #38
agracias

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
391
Senior Member
Default
I don't think they would necessarily stop transmitting outside of school. It's open to abuse on by all kinds of people. Whether it's the students giving the tags to friends before disapperaing, the wrong staff getting access to kids whereabouts, other people being able to track kids outside to school. It just sounds like a way for someone to make money at the expense of others. If every school did this, a whole generation would be tracked. Do you think there might be a time when these tags are never removed?
Plus stuff that is out there to "protect" can and does get turned around and used for improper doings.

This is totally different, but remember the laptop sh/t that went down at some school.

They had the webcam remote software on all laptops to find the laptops if they got lost or stolen. But then come to find out they recorded the kids when they were outside of school.
Worth it to lose a laptop or two instead of spying on students at home. If $$ was an issue, wouldn't have bought Apple laptops. Get cheap $250 Window laptops.


In a school that could potentially be a horrible school if kids are not going to class because it sucks, it may not be long until someone gets raped because of how easy this new system would make it for a predator.
I'd rather not have that system so the school can hopefully profit $1.5million a year by getting kids in class if it helps prevent just one person from being taken advantage of.
Im sure there was and still is a better idea to use that $500,000 on to improve attendence to make that $1.5million in aid. $500,000 that would actually improve the school and make it better.
I wouldn't be shocked if a predator heavily pushed for this new system or is even the principal.
agracias is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 06:19 AM   #39
Britiobby

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
587
Senior Member
Default
Yeah i remember the laptops that had their webcam set up like CCTV. And yeah I can imagine the wrong people being involved with this system. Whether it's implementing or using it. A bit like pedo's and perverts finding work with the TSA.
Britiobby is offline


Old 09-02-2012, 06:21 AM   #40
soydaykam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
I don't think they would necessarily stop transmitting outside of school. It's open to abuse on by all kinds of people. Whether it's the students giving the tags to friends before disapperaing, the wrong staff getting access to kids whereabouts, other people being able to track kids outside to school. It just sounds like a way for someone to make money at the expense of others. If every school did this, a whole generation would be tracked. Do you think there might be a time when these tags are never removed?
RFID chips are generally passive devices, so unless the school is going to install readers throughout the area.....
soydaykam is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity