General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
That's the tragedy of it right there. Voter fraud investigations are seen as "partisan." Look for instance at the way that you yourself jumped on this 'investigation' as supposed proof that voter fraud is a genuinely a problem, despite no proof having yet been found. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Find me a voter suppression law called for by any side of politics in the United States. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
If he doesn't know about the Republican Party's very, very long history of voter suppression in the US then he just doesn't want to know. There is a ton of information out there and it has been covered to death by the media for the last half century as have their recent voter suppression efforts. Reminds me of the articles on how an Aussie comedy show putting on black facepaint for a skit show was racist. Memo: Australians live halfway accross the world and do not know everything there is to know about American politics. What is offensive in the Deep South is not offensive to Australians. Point being, we just don't have that shared base of cultural-historical knowledge you assume we have. Sure, I've watched tons of American tv shows and I know that American tv writers despise Republicans. But that doesn't establish much. Yes, I've read a few books on American history--which happened to document rampant voter fraud by Democrats in the Deep South during Jim Crow and Tammany Hall, by the way, along with Democrats like FDR who cleaned up politics. As a matter of fact I have not heard much about voter fraud perpetrated by Republicans at all. And mind you, the last history I read was by a Roosevelt Democrat (or at any rate a historian quite sympathetic to FDR)-Hugh Brogan's Penguin History of the USA. So again, provide me an example of Republican-sponsored voter fraud legislation and I'll happily take it on board. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Let's wait and see if it is a couple of thousand votes or whether its yet another scare about nothing and we're talking about a handful. Voter fraud is a problem which was solved in the US a half century ago. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Wiki says it all really..
In 2007, a report prepared by the staff of the federal Election Assistance Commission found that, among experts, "there is widespread but not unanimous agreement that there is little polling place fraud". The report was based on research conducted by a Republican elections lawyer and another expert with liberal leanings. The final version released to the public, however, stated that there was "a great deal of debate on the pervasiveness of fraud." Democrats charged that the commission, with a Republican majority, had altered the conclusion for political reasons, which the commission denied. During the George W. Bush administration, "The [Department of Justice] devoted unprecedented resources to ferreting out polling-place fraud over five years and appears to have found not a single prosecutable case across the country" Slate reported. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
How the hell is there no fraud? The 1993 Stinson scandal in Philadelphia had rampant fraud. Poll workers today are known to go through the rolls, sign for people who haven't voted, and vote for them.
This law doesn't address such things but this idea that voter fraud doesn't exist in America and that the Democrats aren't benefiting immensely from it is a ****ing joke. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Like I said "This law doesn't address such things" |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Not really, no. The Southerners started voting for Republicans but the Republican party did not subsequently adopt Jim Crow as a policy position. Instead it merely opposes stuff like affirmative action. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
So we have one local GOP official claiming more than 100% of the population voted in some precincts, which would be worrying if true, but when asked for details the dumb ass can't actually name a single precinct where such an event happened. This is sounding like sour grapes to me; "I'm positive fraud happened because I lost". He's made some wild claims which have been proven to be completely false and yet you, like a complete dumb ****, still believe his claims without any evidence what so ever? What is wrong with you?
Sure, investigate it and see if there is any merit to the wild conspiracy theories but require hard evidence before believing said conspiracy theories. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|