LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-13-2012, 10:50 PM   #1
u8MmZFmF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default Mutalation of another person's genitals is a right.
So says the German Chancellor....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18833145

Ridiculous.
u8MmZFmF is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 10:53 PM   #2
Liabmeasez

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Explain how it's ridiculous? Callous, maybe. Ridiculous? Bordering R&P.
Liabmeasez is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 10:55 PM   #3
nizcreare

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
Explain how it's ridiculous? Callous, maybe. Ridiculous? Bordering R&P.
Ridiculous when borderline child abuse is described as a "right".
nizcreare is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 10:57 PM   #4
Wckcvhsg

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
Dead link. And involuntary genital mutilation of either sex is barbaric and should be banned in any civilized society.
Wckcvhsg is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 10:58 PM   #5
SoOW2LeA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
And involuntary genital mutilation of either sex is barbaric and should be banned in any civilized society.
This is all.
SoOW2LeA is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 10:59 PM   #6
Donadoni1809

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
543
Senior Member
Default
Dead link.
It works fine here.
Donadoni1809 is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 11:01 PM   #7
SasortFkire

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
Dead link. And involuntary genital mutilation of either sex is barbaric and should be banned in any civilized society.
Exactly, and any male who forces or requires a female to be mutilated with the so called 'female circumcision' should heve their penis's head amputated!
It's a truely abhorent practice!
SasortFkire is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 11:05 PM   #8
enteltcheft

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
'female circumcision'
Why the f*ck did I just look that up
enteltcheft is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 11:08 PM   #9
Roxanjbra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Why the f*ck did I just look that up
Weekend fun?
Roxanjbra is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 07:22 AM   #10
StivRichardOff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Dead link. And involuntary genital mutilation of either sex is barbaric and should be banned in any civilized society.
This includes male circumcision
StivRichardOff is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 08:00 AM   #11
portoskins

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
But there are some medical benefits, no? Circumcision has shown to reduce the transferring of some STDs and AIDS from male to female due to bacteria and viruses having a tendency to be caught in the foreskin.
portoskins is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 08:03 AM   #12
eladiopsislab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
611
Senior Member
Default
But there are some medical benefits, no? Circumcision has shown to reduce the transferring of some STDs and AIDS from male to female due to bacteria and viruses having a tendency to be caught in the foreskin.
60% from what I have read. It is the "new" thing to do in much of Africa. Also, it is absurd to equate male circumcision to cutting off the clitoris. Be against it if you want, and there are plenty of valid arguments... but there are about 2 billion males on this planet that know you are talking **** when you say that they equal each other.
eladiopsislab is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 09:45 AM   #13
Doctor-CTAC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
But there are some medical benefits, no? Circumcision has shown to reduce the transferring of some STDs and AIDS from male to female due to bacteria and viruses having a tendency to be caught in the foreskin.
It's called a condom... No sane man would ever say to a hooker "It's cool, I'm circumcised".

And yeah, it DOES reduce the chance of getting AIDS. But the real solution is to use condoms and not sleep with people who have AIDS. The difference between cut and uncut is like one less bullet in the chamber when playing Russian roulette. It's a really stupid idea no matter how you look at it.


As a man who had it done as an adult for medical reasons (I blame my GF) do NOT do this to your children. I have a much higher opinion of my mother for not making that choice for me.

No matter how you slice it (pun intended) it's mutilation, and it's wrong. My wang, not yours! /thread
Doctor-CTAC is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 02:43 PM   #14
avaissema

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
As usual, Rainwind makes a whole lot of sense. Just like female circumcision, the practice of male circumcision is fueled much more by myths than facts.

It should be a choice. I am not mad that choice was made for me, but my boys will be able to choose for themselves when they are adults. It's actually a fairly rare practice is Switzerland (and Europe in general) as well, so you're in a small minority here if you're cut.
avaissema is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 06:26 PM   #15
herrdwq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
A. The article never mentions female circumcision.

B. WTF is wrong with male circumcision? Is it only turtle guys who are outraged by this? I'm a helmet guy and I cannot think of any reason I should be mad at my parents. It doesn't make your dick smaller, and you don't get cheese that turns girls off due to the smell. In fact girls always comment to me about how they like the look compared to turtles
herrdwq is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 06:52 PM   #16
payloansday

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
A. The article never mentions female circumcision.

B. WTF is wrong with male circumcision? Is it only turtle guys who are outraged by this? I'm a helmet guy and I cannot think of any reason I should be mad at my parents. It doesn't make your dick smaller, and you don't get cheese that turns girls off due to the smell. In fact girls always comment to me about how they like the look compared to turtles
The problem is that it's done to kids without their consent.

Nothing wrong with adults doing it at their own free will, especially in Africa where it can help the quell the transmission of AIDS because thanks mostly to the Catholic church no one uses condoms.
payloansday is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 07:12 PM   #17
bloriMal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
A. The article never mentions female circumcision.

B. WTF is wrong with male circumcision? Is it only turtle guys who are outraged by this? I'm a helmet guy and I cannot think of any reason I should be mad at my parents. It doesn't make your dick smaller, and you don't get cheese that turns girls off due to the smell. In fact girls always comment to me about how they like the look compared to turtles
I've found that regular washing also helps to prevent that.
bloriMal is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 07:50 PM   #18
aburva.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
I've found that regular washing also helps to prevent that.
Lol indeed. You substitute sensitivity for the benefit that that you don't have to wash properly? I'll pass....

And for anyone who says you don't lose sensitivity well if you can have your tip rub against clothing all day long and I/we can't stand it for more than a few seconds then clearly there is quite a big difference.

If we allowed religions to practice whatever they wanted people would still be put to death for adultery in western civilisation. Any belief/practice that infringes on another persons rights should not be allowed, it's that simple imo.
aburva.org is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 09:26 PM   #19
gomosopions

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
I can't believe anyone here would DEFEND male circumcision of babies. All major medical organizations are AGAINST it.

Male circumcision should only be done in cases of a medical problem. It is mutilation in any other way.

Wearing a condom protects from aids 100x more than have part of your dick hacked off and smegma isn't any issue if you BATHE REGULARLY, which maybe some FM members don't.

Point is, there is literally NO reason to do it children and the USA is really the only country that does it automatically. It is a SICK practice and needs to stop.
gomosopions is offline


Old 07-14-2012, 10:19 PM   #20
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
I can't believe anyone here would DEFEND male circumcision of babies. All major medical organizations are AGAINST it.

Male circumcision should only be done in cases of a medical problem. It is mutilation in any other way.

Wearing a condom protects from aids 100x more than have part of your dick hacked off and smegma isn't any issue if you BATHE REGULARLY, which maybe some FM members don't.

Point is, there is literally NO reason to do it children and the USA is really the only country that does it automatically. It is a SICK practice and needs to stop.
I agree, although an exception can be made for countries with a high percentage of AIDS since they're so adamant on not using condoms. Still not on babies though.
bitymnmictada is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity