LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-12-2012, 07:00 PM   #21
Skete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
Calling a Shark a Fat Fish is derogatory.
Skete is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 08:44 PM   #22
WXQMQFIr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
Quantum, when choosing between the car or the pizza, would you take a new Kindle or a vacation?
Personally, I'd order the paté.
WXQMQFIr is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 10:14 PM   #23
infelconi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
So did you get this killer arrested ?
infelconi is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 10:41 PM   #24
addifttiest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
LOL...what? If they have all of those things then they are not just bigger smartphones are they.

It's like saying a shark is just a fat fish.
If Apple were to release iPad-sized iPhone - would it automatically be classified as a tablet with a SIM-card? Based on what? Size? Or not classified as a tablet simply because it has a SIM card?

So, if I were to say that a laptop is a under-sized/mobile PC - I would also be wrong?

White racists also think that non-white people are not people because they are not white and have several other different facial features, thus they should be classified as something else...
addifttiest is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 10:50 PM   #25
orapope

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
If Apple were to release iPad-sized iPhone - would it automatically be classified as a tablet with a SIM-card? Based on what? Size? Or not classified as a tablet simply because it has a SIM card?

So, if I were to say that a laptop is a under-sized/mobile PC - I would also be wrong?

White racists also think that non-white people are not people because they are not white and have several other different facial features, thus they should be classified as something else...
I think you've lost it.
orapope is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:10 PM   #26
RemiVedia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
If Apple were to release iPad-sized iPhone - would it automatically be classified as a tablet with a SIM-card? Based on what? Size? Or not classified as a tablet simply because it has a SIM card?

So, if I were to say that a laptop is a under-sized/mobile PC - I would also be wrong?

White racists also think that non-white people are not people because they are not white and have several other different facial features, thus they should be classified as something else...
What, the, ****, are, you, on, about....

Yes the commas were needed. You need help...

Ipads that have 3g have micro sims, or am i mistaken?

--- Post Update ---

Where's Will when you need him...
RemiVedia is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:22 PM   #27
yazetaw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
Something amazing happened here.

The only person that really understood the OP was reddog. Perhaps it was just written in a language that only they can comprehend.

Let's continue to watch, hopefully it was not a retard and run by the OP. Maybe we will get enough back and forth that we can produce a translation slate for future generation to understand this unique form of thought.
Insulting me is immature, but fine. Insulting those who agree with me and calling them names just because they agree with me is plain disrespectful to the entire FM. You know how insanely dumb you would look right now if you realized that reddog and I were actually 2 different people. But we're not - I had to use my second username to make my point... (Sorry reddog - I had to stick it will_perdikaks).

In fact, if you ever see anyone agree with me on anything - it is just me posting from a different username. I have so many of them - I have to keep 500Kb .doc file just for FM. Half the people you think are people are actually me in disguise .

Oh, just so you know, when asked why someone would or would not buy a tablet (when they just started coming out) on CNN interviews, replies frequently consisted of "I already have a smartphone, I don't need a bigger one". All those people who see a strong connection between smartphones and tablets are just morons.

--- Post Update ---

What, the, ****, are, you, on, about....

Yes the commas were needed. You need help...

Ipads that have 3g have micro sims, or am i mistaken?

--- Post Update ---

Where's Will when you need him...
Or are you mistaken? You don't know yourself for a fact and yet you argue? Some tablets do have 3G with micro SIMs, and some do not. Which means that differentiating between smartphones and tablets based on SIM card is stupid, as it doesn't apply to all tablets. Someone mentioned SIM card existence as a way to differentiate between the two, and so I used it as an example just for them.
yazetaw is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:35 PM   #28
chuecafresss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Ok, so he has replied.

Can anyone draw me a map that relates Brat's posts in this this thread with either: (1) the thread in general or (2) the post that he quoted in any particular post?

Also, I need further explanation on the racist analogy. Reddog, mind translating that one?

I feel like there is a lot of information here, just clouded by lots of emotion and possibly Red Bull.
chuecafresss is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:37 PM   #29
Muramoursuard

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
588
Senior Member
Default
Insulting me is immature, but fine. Insulting those who agree with me and calling them names just because they agree with me is plain disrespectful to the entire FM. You know how insanely dumb you would look right now if you realized that reddog and I were actually 2 different people. But we're not - I had to use my second username to make my point... (Sorry reddog - I had to stick it will_perdikaks).

In fact, if you ever see anyone agree with me on anything - it is just me posting from a different username. I have so many of them - I have to keep 500Kb .doc file just for FM. Half the people you think are people are actually me in disguise .

Oh, just so you know, when asked why someone would or would not buy a tablet (when they just started coming out) on CNN interviews, replies frequently consisted of "I already have a smartphone, I don't need a bigger one". All those people who see a strong connection between smartphones and tablets are just morons.

--- Post Update ---




Or are you mistaken? You don't know yourself for a fact and yet you argue? Some tablets do have 3G with micro SIMs, and some do not. Which means that differentiating between smartphones and tablets based on SIM card is stupid, as it doesn't apply to all tablets. Someone mentioned SIM card existence as a way to differentiate between the two, and so I used it as an example just for them.
Is it normal I feel dizzy when I read your posts?
Muramoursuard is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:39 PM   #30
QiuCIOdO

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Personally, I'd order the paté.
What if the vineyard was closed?
QiuCIOdO is offline


Old 07-12-2012, 11:57 PM   #31
royarnekara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
541
Senior Member
Default
If Apple were to release iPad-sized iPhone - would it automatically be classified as a tablet with a SIM-card? Based on what? Size? Or not classified as a tablet simply because it has a SIM card?

So, if I were to say that a laptop is a under-sized/mobile PC - I would also be wrong?

White racists also think that non-white people are not people because they are not white and have several other different facial features, thus they should be classified as something else...
I'm not going to insult you, but I genuinely don't understand what you're saying.
royarnekara is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 01:33 AM   #32
jabader

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Which means that differentiating between smartphones and tablets based on SIM card is stupid, as it doesn't apply to all tablets. Someone mentioned SIM card existence as a way to differentiate between the two, and so I used it as an example just for them.
But YOU compared the S3 with a Nexus 7, which is stupid. That's what we're trying to tell you. I didn't say it was a way to differentiate between phones and tablets as that would be crazy.

Had you made a post saying that you want a wifi only, Android based device to play games on and having compared the two, the S3 works out the better option, then fine.. go for it, good choice. But you posted nonsense, followed by an odd rant.
jabader is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 07:54 AM   #33
YmolafBp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
But YOU compared the S3 with a Nexus 7, which is stupid. That's what we're trying to tell you. I didn't say it was a way to differentiate between phones and tablets as that would be crazy.

Had you made a post saying that you want a wifi only, Android based device to play games on and having compared the two, the S3 works out the better option, then fine.. go for it, good choice. But you posted nonsense, followed by an odd rant.
Nexus 7 was a present for my mommy on July 16th (and she has certain needs like not paying for another data plan because she's paying for mine already, so Wi-Fi only for her), and I wanted to get one myself, but I knew of S III and my Samsung Captive took a swim in my short in my pool, so I needed a new phone. Then I began looking into it and realized Galaxy S III is very similar to Nexus 7.

Nexus 7 is not like other top tablets in several ways and has these features:
1. It is much smaller than other tablets
2 It has a small screen
3. It lacks 3G/4G
4. It runs Android 4.1
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200

Galaxy S III is very similar but also has more features:
1. It is larger than most smartphones
2. It has a big screen
3. It has 4G/LTE
4. It can and it will run Android 4.1 with either official ROMs or modded ones (which are much better!)
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200/$150 if you sign up with AT&T or if you are qualified for a new phone, which renews your contract. Otherwise it costs $600-$800.

Is it not visible how Galaxy S III is a winner if you manage to get it at $200?
YmolafBp is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 08:50 AM   #34
virtuah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
Nexus 7 was a present for my mommy on July 16th (and she has certain needs like not paying for another data plan because she's paying for mine already, so Wi-Fi only for her), and I wanted to get one myself, but I knew of S III and my Samsung Captive took a swim in my short in my pool, so I needed a new phone. Then I began looking into it and realized Galaxy S III is very similar to Nexus 7.

Nexus 7 is not like other top tablets in several ways and has these features:
1. It is much smaller than other tablets
2 It has a small screen
3. It lacks 3G/4G
4. It runs Android 4.1
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200

Galaxy S III is very similar but also has more features:
1. It is larger than most smartphones
2. It has a big screen
3. It has 4G/LTE
4. It can and it will run Android 4.1 with either official ROMs or modded ones (which are much better!)
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200/$150 if you sign up with AT&T or if you are qualified for a new phone, which renews your contract. Otherwise it costs $600-$800.

Is it not visible how Galaxy S III is a winner if you manage to get it at $200?
why is your "mommy" paying your phone bills.... get a job
virtuah is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 03:09 PM   #35
wmzeto

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Nexus 7 was a present for my mommy on July 16th (and she has certain needs like not paying for another data plan because she's paying for mine already, so Wi-Fi only for her), and I wanted to get one myself, but I knew of S III and my Samsung Captive took a swim in my short in my pool, so I needed a new phone. Then I began looking into it and realized Galaxy S III is very similar to Nexus 7.

Nexus 7 is not like other top tablets in several ways and has these features:
1. It is much smaller than other tablets
2 It has a small screen
3. It lacks 3G/4G
4. It runs Android 4.1
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200

Galaxy S III is very similar but also has more features:
1. It is larger than most smartphones
2. It has a big screen
3. It has 4G/LTE
4. It can and it will run Android 4.1 with either official ROMs or modded ones (which are much better!)
5. It has fast/good hardware
6. It costs $200/$150 if you sign up with AT&T or if you are qualified for a new phone, which renews your contract. Otherwise it costs $600-$800.

Is it not visible how Galaxy S III is a winner if you manage to get it at $200?
I give up. There's something wrong with you.
wmzeto is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 03:54 PM   #36
qCGfQR9T

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default
Hai guise.

My phone is better than my tablet.
qCGfQR9T is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 04:14 PM   #37
draigenia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
534
Senior Member
Default
I give up. There's something wrong with you.
I give up. There's something wrong with you.
draigenia is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 04:15 PM   #38
ebonytipchik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
WHAT
THE
FECK
????
ebonytipchik is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 04:24 PM   #39
InsManKV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
why is your "mommy" paying your phone bills.... get a job
Say that in person to the crowd of millions of unemployed in US and Europe who've been trying to get a job for months and I'll sit back and watch that mob murder you. Why won't you give me a good job that pays my bill? Why won't you give jobs to the rest of those people? Maybe you have been living in a cave and not watching the world economy news... only that kind of person would say "get a job" to someone
desperately seeking one.



--- Post Update ---

WHAT
THE
FECK
????
Exactly my thoughts when I look at your avatar - WTF is that?
InsManKV is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 04:27 PM   #40
MaugleeRobins

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Why won't you give me a good job that pays my bill?

Your above posts explain it perfectly.

Although I'd like to see a mob of toddlers murder OHP, it would be sad but very amusing.
MaugleeRobins is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity