General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
An asteroid headed for Earth, big enough to destroy all life and too big to destroy, seen coming with plenty of time. That's the most feasible scenario to overcome the political difficulties under our current understanding of physics, IIUC. Ask Lori or somebody about the scientific difficulties, but I think they're beside the point.
[/killjoy] |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Well, assuming AC's got a viable planet on it, that's...Wiki says it's four light years, if I'm reading it right. That's a couple of decades for people to spend on a ship just waiting for the thing to get there. Even with relativistic whatchamas, that's a considerable amount of one's life to sacrifice. I imagine we'd have to send a probe first just to know if the planet's viable, and the combined times mean the colonization of AC won't happen in either of our lifetimes unless we make some major longevity-boosting discoveries or revolutionize our understanding of physics. Or both.
With the nearest hope so far away, any colony will be effectively cut off from Earth. The expense and time required to reach it will make any commercial enterprise implausible; I don't think any known resource, in any concentration, would be worth such investment. It would take four years and more just to send a message, then another four to get a reply. As far as our planet is concerned, the people sent to AC would no longer exist. And that's why I'm pretty sure it won't happen; it's a massive, long-term investment that will produce nothing to benefit the investor beyond the satisfaction that human beings will exist somewhere so far away it boggles our comprehension. We managed to gin up the cash to land people on the moon, but that's a pitifully minor accomplishment by comparison, only took ten or so years to plan and about a week to accomplish, and we can actually see the celestial body we landed on with the naked eye. Despite that, we lost our enthusiasm for it quickly. A more interesting idea, to me, is underwater cities. The technological and political barriers are far lower, the environment is far more viable, and it might even be cost-effective under the right circumstances. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Actually, Elok, it would take significatly longer to get to AC than a couple of decades. The fastest spaceship to date was Helios, and it went upwards of 150,000 MPH. Going that fast the trip to AC would take over 170,000 years. Whatever ship goes to AC, would have to go significantly faster for it to be even a remote possibility.
I also think you are on to something about the economic returns on the trip. While the actually colony and ship would have no monetary return, the technologies gained in trying to get there could be exploited for profit (simlar to how some aspects of the movie Contact went). So one of the economic questions would be: Could companies get a profit out of the techs needed to go to AC? Underwater cities are a great idea! So great, you should go start your own thread! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Glad you mentioned Niven and the known space universe. That happens to be my favorite. Now aside from stepping disks and the FTL travel, Niven has a tendancy to to stick to Hard Sci-Fi. The early space exploration in the Known Space books, was done with Bussard Ramjets (the idea that if you are going fast enough already, you can collect enough hydrogen in interstellar space to fuel your engine). I believe that this type of engine is actually possible, but we just haven't developed the tech yet. Any of our physists out there know the feasabilities of a Bussard Ramjet?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Here's a continuous-thrust travel time calculator.
Doesn't help you with the underlying mechanics, but really, nobody can help with that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I figured you'd be Corazon's *****. Lots of ecological destruction, though, and you're prone to probes but ehh whatever. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Spartans with that government makes them rich (+2 economy), advanced (+2 research), with a large and elite military (+2 morale, +2 support). You have -1 efficiency and -1 industry but I think those costs are more than made up for by the additional wealth from economy and what you save with the support. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
The article of the '10 year long Civ II game' and recent personal Civ games where I make it my goal to win via Spacerace, has got me thinking: What would it take/How would we get a colony on a habital exoplanet? |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
When it happens, I'm joining the Gaians, because I want those creepy ****ing worms on my side. Screw that, I'm with Lal--"the sane, emotionally balanced person's choice." I only ever played with the Spartan Federation. Free Market, Police State, Knowledge is the way to roll. Knowledge? There only one true path of knowledge, and that path is owned by the University of Planet!
SCIENCE!!! Bunch of Racists ![]() ![]() For the record was it just me or was Lal always the one that dropped planet busters first (even before Yang). So much for sane and emotionally balanced. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
For the record was it just me or was Lal always the one that dropped planet busters first (even before Yang). So much for sane and emotionally balanced. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|