LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-07-2012, 06:13 AM   #21
Sydaycymn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
330
Senior Member
Default
Sparafucil, I really don't think that someone who has made it clear they hate all things English can possibly give an objective point of view on a subject such as this.
Sydaycymn is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:23 AM   #22
Rffkwfct

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Sparafucil, I really don't think that someone who has made it clear they hate all things English can possibly give an objective point of view on a subject such as this.
I think he's just jealous because of all the things the UK has given the world. What has France given it? Not a lot.
Rffkwfct is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:33 AM   #23
Smalmslobby

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
There isn't anyone else there.
Things would be different if Argentina had been allowed to retain control of the Islands.

Um yes you did. You said we should "repatriate" everyone who wishes to remain British. Since that's everyone on the islands, and that they don't want to leave, nor do they wish to be ruled by Argentina, how else would you do it but forcibly? I imagine many will want to leave when the Islands changes hands.

They're your nation's subjects. If you're willing to sacrifice the lives of 255 British servicemen and hundreds more Argentinians for their benefit, I imagine your government would feel some obligation to help relocate those who wished to do so, no?

I think you know exactly the point I'm trying to make. If US territory was invaded by a foreign power, regardless of how it was come by originally, would you expect the US government to tale action? Yes or no? The only foreign power that has even the remotest legitimate claim to a US occupied property is Cuba's claim to Guantanamo Bay naval base.

And yet you (people of European origin) are still there and running things. Why don't we "repatriate" all the people of European origin in the United States and give it back to its rightful owners, namely the native Americans? Even if such a thing were feasible, Native American concepts of territorial ownership is quite different from Europe's, and the idea of nationalism non-existent. It might be another story if most of America were unpopulated, but it's not. The Falklands are. There are apartment towers in New York that house half the number of Falkland Islanders FFS.

It's amazing the absurd lengths some of you brits will go to justify your imperial past. Whereas the French, Spanish, Dutch, and Americans by and large feel remorse for their colonialism, the British seem to think it was some lost Golden Age and not all that bad for the conquered and colonized. You hide behind the respect for the opinion of Islanders because you know they would never vote to secede from Britain, and you wouldn't allow it if they did. History is littered with millions of corpses of those trying to overthrow British rule. The real reason you oppose returning the Falklands is because it would be just another painful reminder of the demise of your nation's empire and increasing global irrelevancy.
Smalmslobby is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:39 AM   #24
Habalinnyf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
I think he's just jealous because of all the things the UK has given the world. What has France given it? Not a lot.
Well technically when the Normans ( Normandy, Northern France ) conquered Britain, they helped mould us in to the country we are today. I also think they helped sales of white flags during the world war lol.

--- Post Update ---

The real reason you oppose returning the Falklands is because it would be just another painful reminder of the demise of your nation's empire and increasing global irrelevancy.
Actually the real reason; which nobody seems to have mentioned, is the possibility of controlling the oil that is about to be mined there. Argentina would not give two hoots about the Falklands if it was not for this. The very fact that you have not even mentioned oil shows how little you really know about the situation this time around.
Habalinnyf is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:49 AM   #25
Npbfamgt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
I think he's just jealous because of all the things the UK has given the world. What has France given it? Not a lot.
I would say France gave the world the United States.

The British gave us the most brutal and tyrannical empire to have ever existed and raped the face of this world.
Npbfamgt is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:53 AM   #26
crycleascentyv

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Actually the real reason; which nobody seems to have mentioned, is the possibility of controlling the oil that is about to be mined there. Argentina would not give two hoots about the Falklands if it was not for this. The very fact that you have not even mentioned oil shows how little you really know about the situation this time around.
I'm aware of the recent oil dispute. But Argentina's claim to the Malvinas have existed long before that. Given their history, Argentina, and many South American nations, are extremely sensitive regarding issues of national territory.
crycleascentyv is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:57 AM   #27
Endatrybeeddy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
I would say France gave the world the United States.

The British gave us the most brutal and tyrannical empire to have ever existed and raped the face of this world.
I am sure if we looked hard enough, we could all find atrocities in our histories. Like the fact that the barbaric way many African's treat each other in wars now (the way people mutilate each other etc) was actually 'taught' to them by the French.
Endatrybeeddy is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 06:59 AM   #28
OccabsLam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Things would be different if Argentina had been allowed to retain control of the Islands.
Things would be different if we'd all stayed in bed. Things would be different if I hadn't let my cat out (I don't have a cat but that's neither here nor there).

We were there first anyway.

Actually the real reason; which nobody seems to have mentioned, is the possibility of controlling the oil that is about to be mined there. Argentina would not give two hoots about the Falklands if it was not for this. The very fact that you have not even mentioned oil shows how little you really know about the situation this time around.
Yeah, it's funny how they were all quiet about them for years after the war, and now they've suddenly started going on about them again.

I would say France gave the world the United States.

The British gave us the most brutal and tyrannical empire to have ever existed and raped the face of this world.
France? Which language do you speak? Did you know that your own Constitution is based on our Magna Carta?
OccabsLam is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:00 AM   #29
Green_Monkey23

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
I would say France gave the world the United States.

The British gave us the most brutal and tyrannical empire to have ever existed and raped the face of this world.
They also educated and helped bring half the world in to the modern age with their science and technology.

I'm aware of the recent oil dispute. But Argentina's claim to the Malvinas have existed long before that. Given their history, Argentina, and many South American nations, are extremely sensitive regarding issues of national territory.
That may be the case, that still does not hide the fact that it really is about oil this time.
Green_Monkey23 is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:01 AM   #30
Optipitle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
I'm aware of the recent oil dispute. But Argentina's claim to the Malvinas have existed long before that. Given their history, Argentina, and many South American nations, are extremely sensitive regarding issues of national territory.
Guilty consciences?

And please don't call them the "Malvinas", that is not their name.
Optipitle is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:08 AM   #31
shenacatro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
France? Which language do you speak? Did you know that your own Constitution is based on our Magna Carta?
Did you know we fought against the British in the Revolutionary war?

--- Post Update ---

They also educated and helped bring half the world in to the modern age with their science and technology.
This is true. In the 1800s, many Americans went to France to get educated in art, architecture, science, math and many other fields and brought all of this back to the United States with them causing us to have heavy French influence.
shenacatro is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:13 AM   #32
Nothatspecial

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
Did you know we fought against the British in the Revolutionary war?
Of course I knew that.

And why would that be? Because you were one of our colonies, so I'd say we were a pretty big influence.
Nothatspecial is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:14 AM   #33
GtmFeqJJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
Did you know we fought against the British in the Revolutionary war?

--- Post Update ---



This is true. In the 1800s, many Americans went to France to get educated in art, architecture, science, math and many other fields and brought all of this back to the United States with them causing us to have heavy French influence.
I distinctly remember posting about the world in general, not just America. Which I must stress, the world does not actually revolve around, despite what you may have been educated to believe.
GtmFeqJJ is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:20 AM   #34
Piediahef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
I distinctly remember posting about the world in general, not just America. Which I must stress, the world does not actually revolve around, despite what you may have been educated to believe.
Of course, the world revolves around the USA and China. Everyone else isn't really a player anymore, but I was just mentioning America to directly link it to my earlier point I was making.

--- Post Update ---

Of course I knew that.

And why would that be? Because you were one of our colonies, so I'd say we were a pretty big influence.
My point was we wouldn't exist without France.
Piediahef is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:26 AM   #35
StizePypemype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Of course, the world revolves around the USA and China. Everyone else isn't really a player anymore, but I was just mentioning America to directly link it to my earlier point I was making.

--- Post Update ---



My point was we wouldn't exist without France.
Actually the world revolves around oil, without which the world economy would collapse.
StizePypemype is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:28 AM   #36
effebrala

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
Actually the world revolves around oil, without which the world economy would collapse.
Eh, maybe temporarily but at that point someone would get rich off of solar power. Did you know more energy from the sun hits the Earth in an hour versus the entire world oil supply? Sounds like BS, but it was from Michio Kaku.
effebrala is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:38 AM   #37
Petrushkaukrop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
584
Senior Member
Default
Eh, maybe temporarily but at that point someone would get rich off of solar power. Did you know more energy from the sun hits the Earth in an hour versus the entire world oil supply? Sounds like BS, but it was from Michio Kaku.
Solar power's been around for years, but it's never been suitable for many serious applications. Nuclear fusion is the future IMO.
Petrushkaukrop is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:38 AM   #38
itepearce

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Eh, maybe temporarily but at that point someone would get rich off of solar power. Did you know more energy from the sun hits the Earth in an hour versus the entire world oil supply? Sounds like BS, but it was from Michio Kaku.
Everyone knows about the potential of free energy, however the trading of oil is so interwined within the world econonmy to remove it suddenly would cause a collapse unlike anything we have known before. However don't worry, people like the Rockerfellers will keep drip feeding us on black gold for many more years and thus keep world economy dependent on it like a drug.
itepearce is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 07:45 AM   #39
infarrelisam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Solar power's been around for years, but it's never been suitable for many serious applications. Nuclear fusion is the future IMO.
It's called advancement in the technology.
infarrelisam is offline


Old 05-07-2012, 09:46 AM   #40
Abaronos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
We were there first anyway.
Nope. The first settlers were French. The Spanish name for the islands is derived from the French.

Um we didn't sacrifice their lives, the Argentinian government did. That's what happens when you start a war, people die.
"He started it!" This logic is childish. You reciprocated an armed conflict where you did not have the moral high ground, and worse, bungled what should have been a clean military operation.

Just answer the question.
I already have. The requirement of a just war is a just cause. There are no foreign powers with a just cause to invade the US. A strong case could be made Argentina has such a cause. Argentina tried every available diplomatic means to regain control of the Malvinas through negotiation. What recourse did they have except to use force? I don't condone violence, but I can't say I blame them.

Bollocks.
And yet there have already been two posts by your fellow countrymen attempting to rationalize British imperialism.
Abaronos is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity