LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-24-2012, 04:11 PM   #1
VFOVkZBj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default The Unwilling Prosecution of Robert Bales
I just read GoD's post about the mainstream media distorting the story about Trayvon Martin's shooting. I've been watching it on the MSM, and it does seem that they are distorting that story for a hidden agenda.

I've also been watching the story of Robert Bales, the Afghanistan US Army shooter who 'allegedly' killed 16 Afghan civilians. It appears to me that there is something not quite above board with that story as well. It appears that the MSM wants to give SSgt Bales a break. Also, it appears that the Army is not all that willing to prosecute him as well, and they they are acting like they have to do, but would rather not.

The MSM keeps coming out with warm and fuzzy stories about Bales. It also appears that they are trying to create the impression that Bales was a 'lone shooter', and that he killed all these people by himself. The Afghans seem to be saying that there was a whole company of American soldiers conducting this atrocity. You'll get this story on the internet, but not in the MSM.

Bales's lawyer says there is no evidence that Bales did what he is accused of--as if the accusations of the Afghans never happened. The Army whisked him out of Afghanistan almost on the first plane out. Both the MSM and the Army are treating him like a conquering hero, who, under the circumstances got carried away, but who should not be punished, because he was just doing his job--which involves, necessarily, killing people.

What I am watching for is how successfully the MSM and the government are at painting this guy the aberrant hero. Will the American people go along with them, and cheer as the prosecution fumbles and fails? Will Americans buy this conquering hero who 'snapped' image of Bales, and approve of letting him go? Does the only fair trial he can get involve an acquittal? Is all the evidence in this case factual? Do Americans think it's OK for soldiers in Afghanistan to massacre innocent people--especially children? If the vast majority of MSM addicted zombies cheer Bales on as a hero, what does this say about America?

The only good I can see coming from this incident is that Bales's lawyer is putting the whole war in Afghanistan on trial. If this speeds the government's departure from this imperial war for resources, I say all the better. I doubt however that justice will be achieved in this case, or that even the truth will emerge.


Hatha
VFOVkZBj is offline


Old 03-24-2012, 04:17 PM   #2
YpbWF5Yo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
what does this say about America? This is a rhetorical question, right?
YpbWF5Yo is offline


Old 03-24-2012, 05:20 PM   #3
VFOVkZBj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
This is a rhetorical question, right? It's rhetorical if you perceive it as so. It just strikes me that the people who run America want us to accept murder as a normal, routine thing in the course of them doing business. The police behave this way. Does calling something a war justify murdering people indiscriminately? Is real life like a violent video game?

All these are rhetorical questions I ask myself regularly. That, likely will stop when I myself am murdered by some lone nut.


Hatha
VFOVkZBj is offline


Old 03-24-2012, 05:25 PM   #4
YpbWF5Yo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
It just strikes me that the people who run America want us to accept murder as a normal, routine thing in the course of them doing business. Note the sig -
YpbWF5Yo is offline


Old 03-25-2012, 12:32 AM   #5
Biradallo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
"It's not a matter of what is true (reality) that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true (reality)." --Heinz Stern aka 'Dr. Kissinger' Your sig line is a very good example of what we might call modern day "sophism."

To be simply put, there are two interpretations of reality.

1. There is only one reality. That's it. Everything that deviates from that one reality is either imaginary or it's a fucking lie.
This is what we are generally taught through the standard educational system. One reality that we find or fight our way through via inventions, discoveries, creative adaptations and so forth. This is what the 99% have been conditioned to believe. The Media propaganda machine has been hard at work inculcating us with this meme by defining distinctions between what is perceived as fact ie NEWS or what is fiction.

2. Reality is relative to one's perception. This is what the 1% ruling elite believe, and so they have developed certain methodologies to manage this by conditioning the population to believe in a single externalized reality. This ruling elite are the Sophists, those who understand that what is perceived to be true, is what becomes truth. They view truth as being relative and malleable. Truth as convincing performance. As being performed on a "stage." The more convincing, the more truthful, and thus the more universally accepted, the more real.

The ruling elite are actors. They act out a scripted role to convince others of a certain course of action, which has been scripted to work in the favor of the actors and the script writers. They are not encumbered by any sort of commitment to the role, since it's just a role. They're able to remain detached from their persona's just the same as actors do in Hollywood. They don't view the role they play as themselves. It's just a fucking role with dialog. Therefore they're able to say and do anything without a guilty conscience. Because reality is relative. It's not fixed. It changes according to what is perceived.

Notice the corollary to sociopathy.
Biradallo is offline


Old 03-25-2012, 02:06 AM   #6
Habalinnyf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Does anyone think this could be a MKULTRA case?
Habalinnyf is offline


Old 03-25-2012, 02:14 AM   #7
VFOVkZBj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
Thank you, Santa. Some things are absolute. Murder is not OK. The Army says they are going to try this guy for murder. But they didn't gather evidence that would convict him. Because of whom he killed, the Army and the MSM are not really pursuing justice--just their own interests. They are getting us inured to stories of murder, so they will be routine events, and as we get desensitized to it, we won't pay attention to it. It's the criminals, terrorists and the 'authorities' that are doing all the killing. Just recently didn't our president, Obama, claim he has the authority to kill anybody he pleases? Not much of a peep about it anywhere--just a quiet resignation that he has the power because he says so. And here we have reluctance in prosecution of people who are getting practice. I heard one argument that the Army is responsible for these murders because they failed to accurately assess this guy's mental health after several tours of duty in war zones. Someone is covering up the truth about how many people were involved. Also, today I heard that SSgt Bales doesn't remember anything about the incident. Something about this tells me it's a staged event. I'm just trying to get to what the real agenda is here. Could the Army be training people to be in death squads? Sorta like the SS?


Hatha
VFOVkZBj is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity