General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
As I explained to our esteemed "elders" before in my inquisition
![]() http://www.ccpoa.org/news/tags/tag/c...ion+of+america Correction Corporation of America Stock ticker..CXW, GEO ticker = GEO. Best to keep an eye out for these stocks..After all it is only your money at work here..LOL |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
You can start here: |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Like I thought more bs. MAN'S mind may be likened to a garden, which may be intelligently |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Fed finances .gov operation. I am not against what is claimed, but I can't use bs to enlighten my circle of friends without being called out and discrediting everything I've said before. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Blanket claim that there are no more public government entities with nothing to back it up with. One example could be just an exception to the rule. Do you treat all of your servants in this manner? Do you expect them to starve or go on welfare while you are deciding whether you want to support them or not? Take yourself as my example. Rebut me if you can. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
To accept the Kings schilling is to take a drink of a tankard and find a schilling in the bottom when the tankard is empty. It is the reason why pewter tankers have a glass bottom, so that the willing "victim" could not proclaim he did not knowingly accept the Kings schilling.
If you have military service behind you did you receive so much as a schilling? Or were you paid in FRN's? If so then for whom were you working? |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
You are on this forum because you profess to believe in the power of gold or silver. How long has it been since you paid any of your "public" servants any specie at all? |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
The U.S. government does many unconstitutional things, where does it say that unconstitutional means no public government? If you can uncover a single one I will be happy to admit there is at least one public employee. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
I'll leave as an exercise for you to discover where public servants in high offices are to have a bond with an oath subscribed on the reverse side. You may at the same time attempt to find out how many of them actually obey this law. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
So You have a theory, but you can't say for sure. Exactly the kind of thing that can be discussed among acolytes, but not ready for the sheeple. I published a legal notice requiring any public servant that wanted to be a part of my government to send me a copy of their oath and bond. I received no takers. The applicants were to send their information to my notary assistant. She provided me with an affidavit that certifies that nobody wanted to participate. I recorded everything with the county recorder. In a republic any citizen can discover a need worth doing and fill that need. I saw a need to have someone for public servants to give their oath to and I acted. Now what have YOU done to uncover the facts? Dump on me? Have another go at it, mate, 'cause you are full of what you call me out on. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Of course I can say for sure. I'd like to see this public record. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
It is a public record then and public records are available to anyone. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Act like a public employee in my presence and you will see it. Otherwise it is recorded in the State of Iowa and you have the same opportunity to pay the State for it as any other member of the public. I think I will follow their lead and also ignore anything you have to offer as it won't fly in the real world. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
All your document proves is that you are ignored. I think I will follow their lead and also ignore anything you have to offer as it won't fly in the real world. Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
My mind is absolutely boggled by the insanity of this. We don't bat an eyelash at spending $150-300 a day for incarcerating these people. But how many of them are non-violent marijuana smokers? I'm sure these people would welcome a deal where you give them $100 a day not to smoke marijuana, and not jail them. Or, legalize Marijuana and not jail anybody or pay them not to use it. Everybody would be better off because the degree of insanity in this is far less than what exists now. How can we afford this? We have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Who's responsible for this idiocy? I, as a taxpayer, for one, don't see any practical way to challenge this waste of money, so it should go on forever, right?
Hatha |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|