Taco Bell Sexy on the Jersey Shore
 

It's a right horror show: http://www.google.com/images?q=guidette

I thought the *****y(est) girl was alright but it's been a while I seen it.

No.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridalplasty

Oh yeah they made one in Sweden too. I haven't seen it so can't compare:
http://i.imgur.com/YoSvG.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/FX8cU.jpg

I think I have you beat actually. Horrendous.

The girls look like transvestites and the guys like homos no offence to homos.

Taco Bell Sexy? http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif

I googled the cast and got this picture:

http://www.tvgasm.com/wp-content/upl...shore-cast.jpg

yikes. Yeah. They're not attractive, especially not television attractive. Realistically, if you knew maybe one or two in real life, you'd probably say she's fairly attractive but not enough to be on television. On top of that, I think half the cast isn't even Italian. I think that Snooki chick is Hispanic.


Oh and it's hilarious how like every country in the world has their own version of this show. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif

The girl on the left is actually fairly attractive. The one on the right however, not quite. She's nicknamed herself 'Barbie' (the second guy on the right calls himself 'Sniper').

http://www.primeurjagers.nl/content/...ias_Barbie.jpg

:vomit:

She looks classy...

gooberish? What does that mean?

The word she was looking for was guido

New Jerseyan/Jerseyite would have also sufficed.

http://media.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFi...417/941267.jpg

http://passionweiss.com/wp-content/u...like-women.jpg

Well we have established that you have low standards. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/tongue.gif

^

Plus "low standards" to most people means putting up with saddlebags, wrinkles, trucked-out facial structures, generally poor hygiene, and the like. A tight, athletic body plus sharply defined, feminine faces (with the exception of Snooky, obviously put a bag over that butterface) is the very definition of high standards looking at the full spectrum of women that are out there and sexually active. It's just the supra-body information we happen to have about the obnoxious personalities, stupidity, and overall skankiness of guidettes that makes us fail to see what would - absent that information and perhaps with its replacement by some degree of normalcy - be half-assed decent pieces of ass.

I like how you censored her stomach and armpit

First of all, I don't ****.
Secondly, what point is it saying the remainder looks ****able? Couldn't you do that to any woman on the planet if you censored enough of her?
Thirdly, it's okay that you have low standards, Darius. You'll be making that good attorney money soon though so you can afford to bump up your standards soon.
Fourthly, I already said that if you knew any of these women, you would consider them fairly attractive, but they're not television attractive.
Fifthly, being fairly attractive does not equal 'oh my god, you make me wanna umpf umpf' http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/rolleyes.gif

We are well aware of this.

Fifthly, being fairly attractive does not equal 'oh my god, you make me wanna umpf umpf' http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/rolleyes.gif That's because you're gay

That was not the correct story to share

Sorry, Kuci. I didn't make that jpeg. And if I had some, my lip gloss wouldn't be popping. I'm not even sure what lip gloss is or why a man would wear it.

I'm not even sure what lip gloss is

Really, AS? You don't know what lip gloss is? Why don't you try sounding out the ****ing words?

So we as men **** or want to **** everything with a slim waist and breasts? http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/rolleyes.gif