LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-14-2010, 08:26 PM   #1
Khurlxgq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default People who pursue a career which fulfills them personally...
Fair enough.

I do what I want. I'm a "become the change" kinda guy.
Khurlxgq is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:31 PM   #2
CIAFreeAgent

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
671
Senior Member
Default
instead of monetarily are the most selfish people in the world.

People who pursue the highest-paying career are to be lauded for their selflessness.

Discuss.
I agree completely.
CIAFreeAgent is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:38 PM   #3
qCGfQR9T

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default
By being fulfilled at a low income you are avoiding taxation on your forsaken money wages. Because higher income people pay more in taxes relative to their benefits from govt this is equivalent to expropriating others for your own consumption.
qCGfQR9T is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:40 PM   #4
Tic Tac Took

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
568
Senior Member
Default
The thread starter is on to something, but needs to take it step further. Those making under $30,000 past the age of 30 for more than 12 months should be sterilized.
Tic Tac Took is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:43 PM   #5
mymnduccete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Depends on what the career is and what is done with that money.

You could argue that for some people con man, thief, prostitute, drug dealer, mafia member, etc are all the best monetary choice for some people.

I would argue that these are (generally) not to be lauded though.

Someone who is a starving artist rather than a engineer, on the other hand, probably shouldn't be lauded though.

Monetary benefit I think isn't directly related to how beneficial a career is, based on arguments similar to the exceptions I raised above.

JM
Why are you lumping together productive pursuits (prostitution, drug dealing) with thievery and the like?
mymnduccete is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:45 PM   #6
Peter Hill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
The thread starter is on to something, but needs to take it step further. Those making under $30,000 past the age of 30 for more than 12 months should be sterilized.
that's setting the bar pretty low wiggy. are you feeling okay?
Peter Hill is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:47 PM   #7
Usesdiums

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Drug dealing hurts others; I wouldn't call it productive. We lose more in medical costs and the fact that smackheads can't get jobs than we gain in the economic activity.

@ OP: I agree, however I don't think you should expect everyone to exhibit that level of selflessness. I would rather be happy than well paid. Although being well paid factors into my happiness. If we are expected to work not to make ourselves happier, why would we work?
Usesdiums is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 08:58 PM   #8
Paladin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
306
Senior Member
Default
If everyone made a lot of money then the money wouldn't have any value... and probably be called lira
Paladin is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:03 PM   #9
RlUbQU3R

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
582
Senior Member
Default
Question. Is this selfish?

Let's say you have this great idea for an invention. You work in your mom's basement living off your dad's salary and invent the silicon transistor. You revolutionize the world with your miraculous invention. Are you still selfish?

(I know this is not how the transistor was really invented. That's not the point.)
RlUbQU3R is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:08 PM   #10
betraaaus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
huh? who says that?
betraaaus is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:09 PM   #11
Leczyslaw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
647
Senior Member
Default
I think that's roughly my counterargument with the transistor story.
Leczyslaw is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:17 PM   #12
juidizHusw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
328
Senior Member
Default
The obvious flaw in douchebag Krazyhorse's pathetic attempt to rationalize his soullless career is that some careers have a bigger impact than your minimal additional tax expenditures from taking a higher paying job. Wiglaf WIN
People get paid their marginal product, to a good approximation.
juidizHusw is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:21 PM   #13
Krruqgwt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
If there's no arbitrage then no one is selfish or selfless, because the labor is being exchanged for exactly its monetary value.
Kuci, you're ignoring the presence of a tax wedge.
Krruqgwt is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 09:23 PM   #14
ChyFDjfed

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Kuci, you're ignoring the presence of a tax wedge.
But we always assume there are no taxes in my intro to financial math class.
ChyFDjfed is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:23 PM   #15
Pyuvjzwf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
instead of monetarily are the most selfish people in the world.

People who pursue the highest-paying career are to be lauded for their selflessness.

Discuss.
I have two really good friends who have master's degrees in electrical engineering but decided to go back to school to get MBAs to make more money (one graduated from Harvard B school and the other Northwestern). They're both working in finance now (one in NYC and the other in LA) but both of them hate the hours they have to work (around 90-100 per week) and both are on the verge of divorce since their wives never see them. Personally, I don't think the money is worth the set backs in your social and personal lives especially since with a decent degree you can easily make low six figures and only work 40-50 hours per week.

Besides the really big money is in starting your own firm.
Pyuvjzwf is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:37 PM   #16
Cydayshosse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
instead of monetarily are the most selfish people in the world.

People who pursue the highest-paying career are to be lauded for their selflessness.

Discuss.
The benefit to society is not necessarily proportional to the pay. For example I think a public school teacher can potentially do a lot of good for society but they won't get paid a lot for it.

And how do we know that things that benefit society are always things that can and/or should be sold.
Cydayshosse is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:43 PM   #17
Karpattaisp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
367
Senior Member
Default
From each according to their ability etc. It's really very simple.
What do you mean, "etc"?

or

Is that only one "etc"? Weak.
Karpattaisp is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:46 PM   #18
Vemnagelignc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Just making sure.

My ref.

Vemnagelignc is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:50 PM   #19
pBiRXp8u

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
My cousin makes $82,000 teaching in California because he gives bad blowjobs, what kind of value is he adding to the world over a normal teacher?
pBiRXp8u is offline


Old 04-14-2010, 10:58 PM   #20
seooptiman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
Public school teachers don't get paid very much because they're engaged in a low value activity
I was just reading that this has a huge cost http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2008/12...ctiveness.html . Additionally in my own experience it has a huge cost.

My school had a very small portion of the TAG kids become successful. Other schools (like the one in NVA) has a very large portion.

JM
seooptiman is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 21 (0 members and 21 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity