Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
OK...so our club's 2-man best-ball match play semi-final match was today and it got unsightly before it got started and I'll attempt to keep this short. This really is an 80% disability event...very essential. First the stats: Me a 16 My teammate a +3 Their participant A was a 2 Their participant W was an 8 They reach the very first tee and we observe that the computer produced scorecard had ink throughout it transforming my teammates disability and putting additional openings with shots due to their group. We asked this and they mentioned that they told the club that the computer was inappropriate and that his disability shouldn't return towards 0 like everyone and should proceed going further from 0 in the positive direction. The clubhouse was called by us and they'd not pay attention to our situation and stated that it had been wrong for the very first three models since the computer doesn't "properly adjust" for an optimistic hcp. We said what-ever and weren't happy...my something was said by teammate to the character of "ok, if you men can playing understanding you're getting more then your principles must be."..and their participant W blew at at that record. He pointed his finger in his experience and said that we were "tainting the fit in the beginning and insinuating that they were deliberately being dishonest." He felt the need certainly to continue and reveal how "honest" they're, and that his teammate was considered to be "the most sincere participant at the club." We began play after getting things in check and the tension could be cut by you in the fit with a dull basketball. They certainly were 3 up after 11 and on the 12th hole the expert comes operating to the fairway and gets all of us together and states "sorry guys, we've never had a + person within an 80% function and what another group told him made sense and he went with it. He looked up the principle from the USGA and he said after it was questioned by us it got his thinking and unearthed that my teammate was proper. Where it gets much more angering from out viewpoint listed here is. Immediately my teammate and I said "dead-day, we've to play it over still another day." They said no, lets just return and where required change and play it out. (part not...the 8 hcp was a -3 at this time in the round!!!!) It'd have improved the rating for 1 pit that people would have gained in the place of a half. So that they said "we are simply 2up in the place of 3up and perform on." We said BS...if we get 6 we go off that green having won 6 and 5 and are Square in the place of 1 down and pursuing them. Plus...the mind-set of my teammate wasn't good thinking about the condition and that the match was played underneath the wrong pretenses. Because we'd perhaps not agree...the pro finally stated that it must be replayed and considered it for a while. We completed like this...we performed out 12-18, demonstrably with less stress but with much more pressure. Me 90 (74 online) My teammate 69 (72 online) Their A person 69 (67 online) Their W participant 71 (63 online) Really angering situation.
![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|