[Xfxhbcxp]

It's virtually standard to anticipate that sequels be poor, and exactly why is that? In my opinion now in my own heart of hearts when a sequel is poor, it's because somebody didn't work hard enough. Perhaps not due to fortune, or various other environmental factors. I've long thought that Toy Story 2 is among the several films where the sequel is preferable to the initial. Toy Story was recently seen by me 3 and once more it beats those that came before. Somehow that proves in my experience that developing a good sequel is merely a matter of not taking mediocrity. Where in actuality the final picture of a multi-parter that constantly constructed on the success of it's predecessors what films perhaps you have seen? (Don't tell the Star Wars prequels to me, since the account sequences weren't made chronologically)