[zilsolley3]

#############
http://www.henrymakow.com/time_to_ab...erans_day.html
##############

When the United States and England loaned Mexico money in 1903 using its customs revenue as collateral, Illuminati banker Jacob Schiff cabled his English counterpart, Ernest Cassel:

"If they don't pay, who will collect the customs?"

Cassel replied:

"Your marines and ours." (The Life of Otto Kahn, p. 22)

Marine General Smedley Butler (1881-1940) confirmed that he was "a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers."

In War is a Racket (1935) he wrote: "I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested."

Flash forward to 2011 when NATO fomented and led a "revolution" in Libya, one of only four countries that didn't have a Rothschild central bank. Now Libya does.

They don't call it imperialism anymore. They call it a "Our mission in Libya." Soldiers aren't mercenaries; they are "missionaries."

CENTRAL BANKERS ARE BEHIND ALL WARS

All wars are organized by the Illuminati bankers to collect or incur debt, plunder or profit, and to advance their program for "world government" tyranny. They appeal to our patriotism to sucker us in. We are fighting to "preserve freedom" when the opposite is actually the case.

So how should we regard veterans? Certainly a few are heroes, but usually in a bogus cause.

I think we have to regard them as the dupes and mercenaries of the bankers. We have all been duped for a very long time. That gives Veteran's Day a tinge of cynicism and pathos.

On Nov. 11, we are mostly commemorating World War Two. While we were losing fathers and sons, Allied and Nazi central bankers were huddled at the Bank of International Settlements in Basel mainly financing the Nazis.

The BIS handed over to the Nazis the national gold of Czechoslovakia, Holland and Belgium to ensure the war could go on. The BIS accepted and stored Nazis plunder -- art, diamonds and precious metals including dental gold and wedding rings from concentration camp inmates. This gold, worth $378 million at the time, was the basis of loans to the Nazis and was never returned.

The US Federal Reserve, the Banks of England, France, Italy, Japan and the Reichsbank were all members of the BIS. The Nazi Reichsbank had most seats but the BIS President was a Rockefeller factotum Thomas H. McKittrick (1889-1970). (Significantly he has no Wikipedia entry.)

WAR TO "CHANGE THE WORLD"

Questioned by a US Treasury Dept official in March 1945, McKittrick said that the war had been a charade, with Germany taking the fall.

Asked why the Nazis had worked with the BIS, he replied, "In the complicated German financial setup, certain men who have their central bankers' point of view are in very strategic positions and can influence the conduct of the German government..."

Then he spelled it out. The war's purpose was to reposition Germany for the banker New World Order:

"McKittrick went on to say that there was a little group of financiers who had felt from the beginning that Germany would lose the war; that after defeat they might emerge to shape Germany's destiny. That they would "maintain their contacts and trust with other important banking elements so that they would be in a stronger position in the postwar world to negotiate loans for the reconstruction of Germany."

This quotation is from Charles Higham's mind blowing book, Trading With the Enemy, 1983 p. 37. A Who's Who of US banks, and corporations controlled by these bankers, had factories in occupied Europe. They underpinned the Nazi war effort and profited handsomely.

Chase Manhattan, Ford, General Motors, Standard Oil and ITT provided the Nazis with essential trucks, airplane engines, materiel and technology, often giving the Nazis preference during shortages. In a telling example, the Allies bombed a ball bearing plant in Germany only to have them replaced by ball bearings from a factory in Pennsylvania (via Sweden.)

Higham refers to these bankers as "the fraternity." They are the Illuminati.

We could also show how an earlier set of bankers masterminded World War One and how they kept it going. But I think you get the picture. All wars are really waged by the Luciferian central bankers against humanity, i.e "the goyim."

In 1916, almost 1.2 million British, French and German soldiers died or were maimed in the Battle of the Somme alone. They were the cream of their generation. By participating in any war, we are accomplices in our own destruction.

The military is catching on too. A recent poll found that only 34 percent of U.S. veterans of the post-9/11 military believed that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were worth fighting. US soldiers now generally say they are fighting "for their buddies" not for their country.

CONCLUSION

We cannot honor veterans without recognizing that, like us, they have been duped. Otherwise, we perpetuate the fraud and the sinister power which holds us prisoner.

The New World Order is about replacing the rule of God with the rule of Lucifer. That's why "God" has become a dirty word. War is the principal means used by Lucifer's disciples, the Cabalist (satanist) bankers, to reshape the world.

They have erected a police state behind the facade of freedom. We don't know this because our leaders in government, education and media are wittingly or unwittingly, part of their scheme. Treason to God and country is a prerequisite for success.

If honoring veterans means perpetuating a suicidal cycle of endless war, we must stop. Better to honor the dead by abolishing wars. We can do this by abolishing private central banks, and bringing the bankers and their minions to justice.

[SerycegeBunny]

Bankers are now planning to eat up the assets of Italy.

###############

http://www.infowars.com/ecb-riots-be...ces-austerity/
################

But forget the chortling approval for austerity you hear coming out of the corporate media. In fact, as blogger J. Brad Hicks notes, the whole thing is a scam, as usual:

Deutsche Bank and other German banks loaned huge sums of money to Greece and Italy, knowing for a fact that at least half of the loaned money was being stolen by wealthy personal friends and business partners of government officials, and not caring, because they knew that the ECB would enforce “austerity,” would demand that people who didn’t benefit from those loans, not the wealthy people who did, pay them back by the enforced looting of those countries of every asset. There will be riots; there may well even be civil war, but Deutsche Bank will be repaid and those countries’ infrastructure and archaeological treasures and other resources will end up in the hands of the banksters and their friends for pennies on the dollar, extracted at gunpoint by the Greek and Italian armies with whatever “stabilization” help they need from NATO – as a matter of sacred principle.

Meanwhile, in Europe, the IMF Riot has morphed into the ECB Riot.

###########

[JamesTornC]

###############
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/comple...opean-bank-run
##############

There can be no question that this train wreck could have been seen, and was in fact seen coming, for years now, and that there have been the sleaziest type of manuevering (see rest of this section as to the why of the 'sleazy') by the likes of the Goldman Sachs & JPM and their filthy ilk, to seize upon this latest crisis, who have now ramped up efforts to do everything they can to accelerate the crisis, and who are assuredly betting on positions that will reward them many, many times over, while knowing full well that a) they literally have a voice in the governments of key EU Member States and the ECB itself through former (and even present) agents of their firms as to how to influence the decisions that will be made, and b) if things go wrong for them despite 'a', they will simply fall back on their "we're too big too fail because if we did, it would only assure and hasten a global economic collapse, and therefore give us our taxpayer backstop; here's the blank check Mr. President, Mr. Treasury Secretary & our very dear friends (and colleagues) at the ECB & Federal Reserve (and in select EU governments), so go give your scary speeches to the public now about 'martial law' and 'tanks in the streets' and we'll fill in the number on the check."



So, my friends and fellow takers of the red pill, we all can clearly see that Old Man Rothschild - you know, the Great Red Shield House of Financial Empire - which just so coincidentally established its roots in Germany back in the 1600s, and then successfully gained control, through devious and brilliant chessmanship, of the global fiat supply (would you plebes like some inflation or some deflation to separate you from your homes, property, other inherent valuable and even your food?) - is back at the SSDD playbook, with all the right pieces (and lackeys) in place, whether political actors or banking and banker proxies - and is set to reap yet another Great & Bountiful HARVEST for the Money Masters.

It's a Big Club, and 99.9999% of us ain't in it, so remember that if you haven't taken the proper precations, quit playing a rigged game on their terms, as they beat you over the head with the Big Club (as they pepper spray your sister in the face, kick your family out of your house, take your farms, turn the riot police or military loose on the citiizens they always told you were there to protect you, fire live ammunition at you, or even design and implement plans to overthrow your government if you are just so unfortunate enough to be living in an alleged sovereign nation that has rich resources - or anything that can be leveraged to extract blood from you for that matter, such as being able to buy up the rainwater and aquifiers to charge you for the privilege of drinking the water - and especially so if your government has no fractional reserve central bank bearing the Red Shield™ Mark of Approval, ala Federal Reserve 'Bank' or Central 'Bank' of England style).

All you blue pill takers, disregard this, because it's - you know - the talk of conspiracy theorists and such.

For those with a strong enough CONSTITUTION to have already swallowed the red pill, or who think they can and would like to try, The Money Masters, bitchez!
The Money Masters

[Wheldcobchoto]

###########
http://www.thedailybell.com/3267/The...ion-Uber-Alles
########

Europe suffered tens of millions killed during two world wars and massive destruction and dislocation twice because of a few wealthy families and banking elites. It is time for both Europe and America to learn from our past mistakes.

If your parents and grandparents enjoyed the Great Depression, the rise of fascism, the two world wars and the cold war where all of Eastern Europe was under the boots of Soviet occupation then follow the establishment false hope and promises of a stronger, more centralized EU. I fear our new 21st century with sovereign debt and currency collapse along with endless wars will become a carbon copy of the 20th century.

Leave the EU Casino Now

The banks will be bailed out and the EU will survive regardless of the cost as long as there are citizens to rob and wealth to confiscate to support the banks. The casino is rigged and taxpayers will lose. So get ready for what could be the biggest bank run and sovereign debt collapse in world history. It will begin in Greece, Italy and Spain but the panic will quickly run through most of Europe, ending where the banking scam all began on Wall Street and inside the boardrooms of Goldman Sachs. Remember, both the leaders of the European and American Unions and the banking elites consider themselves a cut above the rest of us. They will not protect us but rather loot our remaining wealth and liberties so they can survive the economic crisis they created.

[megatrendsZ]

City of London : The epicenter of global banking empire

#############
http://www.thedailybell.com/1814/City-of-London.html
###############
City of London

The City of London the historic central core of London is an independent entity about a mile square. Britain's financial services industry and central bank (Bank of England) are located in the City of London. There is a London Corporation that runs the City; it is not run by greater London. It has its own police force and is headed by a Lord Mayor. About 10,000 people call the City "home" but nearly 350,000 work in the City of London, including many lawyers and litigators. Historically, the City harkens back to Roman London, founded around 50AD and known as Londinium.

The City waxed and waned for centuries but by the 16th Century was taking on its modern profile as a banking and commercial center. A stock exchange was eventually founded and many international merchants made their headquarters in the City. By the 18th Century, Britain's Industrial Revolution was beginning and the Empire itself was expanding. London spread out far beyond the City of London, but the City itself gained enormous power as the British conquered one-fourth of the world, colony by colony.

The City of London has its own motto: "Domine dirige nos" – "Lord, direct (guide) us." It has its own coat of arms and flag. It maintains its unique status as perhaps the world's oldest incorporated city, with 25 wards that also serve as political districts. Each ward has an Alderman and Beadles, as well as a Ward Club – something like a residents' association. The City of London supports performing arts centers and administers the Bridge House Trust, which in turn supervises the famous bridges of central London, including London Bridge and Blackfriars Bridge.

All this is somewhat beside the point, however. In reality, the City of London is actually the epicenter of an Anglo-American power elite that has dominated world finance for 500 years or more. The elite's modern genealogy is said to include Venetian bankers who arrived in Britain and intermarried with English royalty. Today, the world's most powerful families make the City of London either their home or base of operations. Even the Queen of England bows before she enters the City of London and when she walks in ceremonial parades, her place is a few steps behind the Lord Mayor.

Today, the City of London is the epicenter of central banking worldwide. It is the place from which world wars have emanated and plans for global conquest are apparently hatched there even today. The fear-based dominant social themes that the power elite uses to extract wealth and power from Western middle classes have their home in the City of London. The UN and League of Nations were given birth there and the EU was likely conceived there. Every centralizing influence in the world today of any note has its roots in the City of London or its sister-municipalities, Washington, DC and the Vatican. These three "independent" city-states function as a trilogy of money power, the building blocks of the New World Order, the epicenter of an effort that apparently seeks to organize the world into one large medieval plantation.

The City of London may seem like a quaint, historical backwater but it likely lies at the heart of the world's current turmoil. The Rothschilds themselves do business out of the City of London and the vastness of resources located in and around the City of London must number in the tens or even hundreds of trillions. Money power is centralized in the City of London and has never been dispersed, despite ever-present talk about how the "City" is losing its clout as a major financial player. It is not.

[BrianGoldsmith]

Brits will not give up their colonial thinking, attitude and behavoir.

[Plokiikmol]

More insight on how bankers frighten the public to grab the public wealth.

################

UBS On Euro Break Up: Buy Gold, Tinned Goods and Guns
http://www.infowars.com/ubs-on-euro-...oods-and-guns/
#############
As EU technocrats attempt to seize total control over national economies by exploiting the eurozone debt crisis to empower and enrich their own corrupt institutions, top banks like UBS are on hand to supply a helpful deluge of doomsday rhetoric in order to grease the skids for the takeover.

Warning that if a “fix” is not implemented imminently the world faces financial collapse, UBS’ Larry Hataway presents numerous “end of the world” scenarios in arguing that the eurozone needs to be preserved in its current form.

The whole piece is nothing less than an exercise in scaremongering. At one point, Hataway compares the situation to “the horrors of the first half of the 20th century,” suggesting that the crisis is on a similar scale to the impact of both world wars.


Hataway emphasizes his point by urging people to stock up on guns, food and gold.

“I suppose there might be some assets worthy of consideration—precious metals, for example. But other metals would make wise investments, too. Among them tinned goods and small calibre weapons,” he writes.

While such investment advice actually makes sense in the current climate, fearmongering about such dire scenarios is of course a ruse to browbeat Europeans into accepting the complete takeover of their countries by unelected technocrats.

As we reported yesterday, Brussels is preparing to change the Lisbon Treaty with the stroke of a pen in a bid to seize absolute control over euro member states in financial trouble. Under the terms of the new deal, the European Commission would be empowered “to impose austerity measures on eurozone countries that are being bailed out, usurping the functions of government in countries such as Greece, Ireland, or Portugal.”

Nation states would have to prostrate themselves in front of unelected EU technocrats in order to get their budgets approved, an outcome that would allow EU elitists to usurp “intrusive control” over national policy.

As part of this process, the pension funds of millions of Europeans will be raided to meet EU-IMF imposed austerity cuts. Portugal has already begun to transfer the assets from four of Portugal’s biggest banks to the state balance sheet in order to cut budget deficits as part of the requirements of its €78bn euro bailout.

Such a massive power grab is made easier by big banks like UBS greasing the skids with apocalyptic rhetoric and threats of doomsday scenarios should the EU not be granted complete autonomy.

This huge transfer of wealth from the population to global central banks their subsidiaries under the camouflage of “austerity” is already in full swing in Ireland, where the people are set to be hit with another VAT rise, a new property tax, tax hikes on goods, and a raising of the retirement age, while benefits for the poor are being cut across the board.

The world will not end if the eurozone disintegrates – Europe existed before the euro and it will continue to exist even if nations have to revert back to their old currencies.

There is no “fix” for the eurozone, the problems will continue to worsen so long as the same people who caused them in the first place continue to exploit the crisis as a means of enriching their own corrupt institutions by financially raping the population of an entire continent.

[preachadaq]

More insight on how bankers punished its own minions if one of them rebel against the official line.

##################

http://www.henrymakow.com/the_forces...opean_imm.html

#################
Africans would be as rich as Saudis, if they would be paid for their natural resources instead of taking it for free in exchange for IMF book entries. In the late 1980ies Deutsche Bank CEO Alfred Herrhausen already maintained that the debt crisis threatens the peace and economic well PIC-2-Herrhausen-memorial.jpgbeing of the whole of humanity! His insistence on debt forgiveness for 3rd world countries, even at the

Bilderberg meeting, caused waves in the upper echelons of the banking community. He was soon assassinated. These two pillars of masonry have been erected where he died.
When current Deutsche Bank CEO Ackermann was asked about debt relief on state TV he said that he wouldn´t want to share the fate of Herrhausen.

[tipoketpu]

Check this video to see how arrogant these bankers can be.

#########

http://www.infowars.com/sen-jay-rock...on-bilderberg/

##########

Sen. Jay Rockefeller Quips About World Domination, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission and rule by the rich. Clip aired on C-SPAN on 10-19-1991.

[Edifsdubs]

###########
http://www.thetotalcollapse.com/chin...#comment-46990

###########

As we noted in our previous report, it is worth mentioning again the words of the American Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson, who warned his fellow citizens over 200 years ago about what is happening today by saying:

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

[BqTyG9eS]

Great info on the history of bankers is kept here
############
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/
###########

Venice

The Venetian Conspiracy
Address delivered to the ICLC Conference near Wiesbaden, Germany, Easter Sunday, 1981; (appeared in Campaigner, September, 1981)

The Role of the Venetian Oligarchy in Reformation, Counter-reformation, Enlightenment, and the Thirty Years’ War
ICLC Conference, 6 September 1992; (appeared in New Federalist, April, 1993)

Giammaria Ortes: The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”
Printed in The American Almanac, June 20, 1994

How the Dead Souls of Venice Corrupted Science
Speech to Schiller Institute Conference, September 4, 1995. Printed in The American Almanac, January, 1996.

Venice’s War Against Western Civilization
Appeared in Fidelio, Summer 1995

The War of the League of Cambrai, Paolo Sarpi and John Locke
From ICLC Conference panel titled: “The Axioms of the American System,” Feb. 18, 1996; (appeared in New Federalist, March 18, 1996)


The British

How the Venetian System Was Transplanted Into England
New Federalist, June 3, 1996

The British Empire Bid for Undisputed World Domination, 1850-1870
Schiller Institute Food For Peace Conference, Chicago, February 22-23, 1992

Lord Palmerston’s Multicultural Human Zoo
ICLC Conference, February 20, 1994

King Edward VII of Great Britain: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente and World War 1
ICLC Conference, February, 1995

Sir Edward Grey Turned Sarajevo Crisis Into War
Printed in The American Almanac, March, 1995

The Versailles Thesis: The Roots of WWI, and WWII
Conference Speech by Webster Tarpley, Schiller Institute Food For Peace Conference, Chicago, Illinois, February 22-23, 1992.

The Versailles Treaty: The War Guilt Clause
Printed in the American Almanac, March, 1995

British Financial Warfare: 1929; 1931-33; How The City Of London Created The Great Depression
December 1996

[GSgCGxsF]

More insight on the bankers !!

###########
The Elite Plan for a New World Social Orde

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/artic...d-social-order

############

When the Industrial Revolution began in Britain, in the late 1700s, there was lots of money to be made by investing in factories and mills, by opening up new markets, and by gaining control of sources of raw materials. The folks who had the most money to invest, however, were not so much in Britain but more in Holland. Holland had been the leading Western power in the 1600s, and its bankers were the leading capitalists. In pursuit of profit, Dutch capital flowed to the British stock market, and thus the Dutch funded the rise of Britain, who subsequently eclipsed Holland both economically and geopolitically.

In this way British industrialism came to be dominated by wealthy investors, and capitalism became the dominant economic system. This led to a major social transformation. Britain had been essentially an aristocratic society, dominated by landholding families. As capitalism became dominant economically, capitalists became dominant politically. Tax structures and import-export policies were gradually changed to favour investors over landowners.

It was no longer economically viable to simply maintain an estate in the countryside: one needed to develop it, turn it to more productive use. Victorian dramas are filled with stories of aristocratic families who fall on hard times, and are forced to sell off their properties. For dramatic purposes, this decline is typically attributed to a failure in some character, a weak eldest son perhaps. But in fact the decline of aristocracy was part of a larger social transformation brought on by the rise of capitalism.

The business of the capitalist is the management of capital, and this management is generally handled through the mediation of banks and brokerage houses. It should not be surprising that investment bankers came to occupy the top of the hierarchy of capitalist wealth and power. And in fact, there are a handful of banking families, including the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, who have come to dominate economic and political affairs in the Western world.

Unlike aristocrats, capitalists are not tied to a place, or to the maintenance of a place. Capital is disloyal and mobile – it flows to where the most growth can be found, as it flowed from Holland to Britain, then from Britain to the USA, and most recently from everywhere to China. Just as a copper mine might be exploited and then abandoned, so under capitalism a whole nation can be exploited and then abandoned, as we see in the rusting industrial areas of America and Britain.

This detachment from place leads to a different kind of geopolitics under capitalism, as compared to aristocracy. A king goes to war when he sees an advantage to his nation in doing so. Historians can ‘explain’ the wars of pre-capitalist days, in terms of the aggrandisement of monarchs and nations.

A capitalist stirs up a war in order to make profits, and in fact our elite banking families have financed both sides of most military conflicts since at least World War 1. Hence historians have a hard time ‘explaining’ World War 1 in terms of national motivations and objectives.

In pre-capitalist days warfare was like chess, each side trying to win. Under capitalism warfare is more like a casino, where the players battle it out as long as they can get credit for more chips, and the real winner always turns out to be the house – the bankers who finance the war and decide who will be the last man standing. Not only are wars the most profitable of all capitalist ventures, but by choosing the winners, and managing the reconstruction, the elite banking families are able, over time, to tune the geopolitical configuration to suit their own interests.

Nations and populations are but pawns in their games. Millions die in wars, infrastructures are destroyed, and while the world mourns, the bankers are counting their winnings and making plans for their postwar reconstruction investments.

From their position of power, as the financiers of governments, the banking elite have over time perfected their methods of control. Staying always behind the scenes, they pull the strings controlling the media, the political parties, the intelligence agencies, the stock markets, and the offices of government. And perhaps their greatest lever of power is their control over currencies. By means of their central-bank scam, they engineer boom and bust cycles, and they print money from nothing and then loan it at interest to governments. The power of the elite banking gang (the ‘banksters’) is both absolute and subtle…

Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
– President Woodrow Wilson
The End of Growth – Banksters vs. Capitalism

It was always inevitable, on a finite planet, that there would be a limit to economic growth. Industrialisation has enabled us to rush headlong toward that limit over the past two centuries. Production has become ever more efficient, markets have become ever more global, and finally the paradigm of perpetual growth has reached the point of diminishing returns.

Indeed, that point was actually reached by about 1970. Since then capital has not so much sought growth through increased production, but rather by extracting greater returns from relatively flat production levels. Hence globalisation, which moved production to low-waged areas, providing greater profit margins. Hence privatisation, which transfers revenue streams to investors that formerly went to national treasuries. Hence derivative and currency markets, which create the electronic illusion of economic growth, without actually producing anything in the real world.

For almost forty years, the capitalist system was kept going by these various mechanisms, none of which were productive in any real sense. And then in September 2008 this house of cards collapsed, all of a sudden, bringing the global financial system to its knees.

If one studies the collapse of civilisations, one learns that failure-to-adapt is fatal. Is our civilisation falling into that trap? We had two centuries of real growth, where the growth-dynamic of capitalism was in harmony with the reality of industrial growth. Then we had four decades of artificial growth – capitalism being sustained by a house of cards. And now, after the house of cards has collapsed, every effort is apparently being made to bring about ‘a recovery’ – of growth! It is very easy to get the impression that our civilisation is in the process of collapse, based on the failure-to-adapt principle.

Such an impression would be partly right and partly wrong. In order to understand the real situation we need to make a clear distinction between the capitalist elite and capitalism itself. Capitalism is an economic system driven by growth; the capitalist elite are the folks who have managed to gain control of the Western world while capitalism has operated over the past two centuries. The capitalist system is past its sell-by date, the bankster elite are well aware of that fact – and they are adapting.

Capitalism is a vehicle that helped bring the banksters to absolute power, but they have no more loyalty to that system than they have to place, or to anything or anyone. As mentioned earlier, they think on a global scale, with nations and populations as pawns. They define what money is and they issue it, just like the banker in a game of Monopoly. They can also make up a new game with a new kind of money. They have long outgrown any need to rely on any particular economic system in order to maintain their power. Capitalism was handy in an era of rapid growth. For an era of non-growth, a different game is being prepared.

Thus, capitalism was not allowed to die a natural death. Instead it was brought down by a controlled demolition. First it was put on a life-support system, as mentioned above, with globalisation, privatisation, currency markets, etc. Then it was injected with a euthanasia death-drug, in the form of real-estate bubbles and toxic derivatives. Finally, the Bank of International Settlements in Basel – the central bank of central banks – pulled the plug on the life-support system: they declared the ‘mark-to-market rule’, which made all the risk-holding banks instantly insolvent, although it took a while for this to become apparent. Every step in this process was carefully planned and managed by the central-banking clique.
The End of Sovereignty – Restoring the Ancien Régime

Just as the financial collapse was carefully managed, so was the post-collapse scenario, with its suicidal bailout programs. National budgets were already stretched; they certainly did not have reserves available to salvage the insolvent banks. Thus the bailout commitments amounted to nothing more than the taking on of astronomical new debts by governments. In order to service the bailout commitments, the money would need to be borrowed from the same financial system that was being bailed out!

It’s not that the banks were too big to fail, rather the banksters were too powerful to fail: they made politicians an offer they couldn’t refuse. In the USA, Congress was told that without bailouts there would be martial law the next morning. In Ireland, the Ministers were told there would be financial chaos and rioting in the streets. In fact, as Iceland demonstrated, the sensible way to deal with the insolvent banks was with an orderly process of receivership.

The effect of the coerced bailouts was to transfer insolvency from the banks to the national treasuries. Banking debts were transformed into sovereign debts and budget deficits. Now, quite predictably, it is the nations that are seeking bailouts, and those bailouts come with conditions attached. Instead of the banks going into receivership, the nations are going into receivership.

In his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins explains how the third world has been coerced over the past several decades – through pressure and trickery of various kinds – into perpetual debt bondage. By design, the debts can never be repaid. Instead, the debts must be periodically refinanced, and each round of refinancing buries the nation deeper in debt – and compels the nation to submit to even more drastic IMF diktats. With the orchestrated financial collapse, and the ‘too big to fail’ scam, the banksters have now crossed the Rubicon: the hit-man agenda is now operating here in the first world.

In the EU, the first round of nations to go down will be the so-called PIGS – Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain. The fiction, that the PIGS can deal with the bailouts, is based on the assumption that the era of limitless growth will resume. As the banksters themselves know full well, that just isn’t going to happen. Eventually the PIGS will be forced to default, and then the rest of the EU will go down as well, all part of a controlled-demolition project.

When a nation succumbs to debt bondage, it ceases to be a sovereign nation, governed by some kind of internal political process. Instead it comes under the control of IMF diktats. As we have seen in the third world, and is happening now in Europe, these diktats are all about austerity and privatisation. Government functions are eliminated or privatised, and national assets are sold off. Little by little – again a controlled demolition – the nation state is dismantled. In the end, the primary functions left to government are police suppression of its own population, and the collection of taxes to be handed over to the banksters.

In fact, the dismantling of the nation state began long before the financial collapse of 2008. In the USA and Britain, it began in 1980, with Reagan and Thatcher. In Europe, it began in 1988, with the Maastricht Treaty. Globalisation accelerated the dismantling process, with the exporting of jobs and industry, privatisation programs, ‘free trade’ agreements, and the establishment of the regulation-busting World Trade Organisation (WTO). Events since 2008 have enabled the rapid acceleration of a process that was already well underway.

With the collapse, the bailouts, and the total failure to pursue any kind of effective recovery program, the signals are very clear: the system will be allowed to collapse totally, thus clearing the ground for a pre-architected ‘solution’. As the nation state is being dismantled, a new regime of global governance is being established to replace it. As we can see with the WTO, IMF, World Bank, and the other pieces of the embryonic world government, the new global system will make no pretensions about popular representation or democratic process. Rule will be by means of autocratic global bureaucracies, which will take their orders, directly or indirectly, from the bankster clique.

In his book, The Globalization of Poverty, Michel Chossudovsky explains how globalisation, and the actions of the IMF, created massive poverty throughout the third world over the past several decades. As we can see, with the dramatic emphasis on austerity following the collapse and bailouts, this poverty-creation project has now crossed the Rubicon. In this new world system there will be no prosperous middle class. Indeed, the new regime will very much resemble the old days of royalty and serfdom (the ancien régime). The banksters are the new royal family, with the whole world as their dominion. The technocrats who run the global bureaucracies, and the mandarins who pose as politicians in the residual nations, are the privileged upper class. The rest of us, the overwhelming majority, will find ourselves in the role of impoverished serfs – if we are lucky enough to be one of the survivors of the collapse process.

Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.
– Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderbergers meeting
The End of Liberty – The Global Police State

For the past four decades, since about 1970, we’ve been experiencing a regime-change process, from an old global system to a new global system. In the old system, first world nations were relatively democratic and prosperous, while the third world suffered under police state tyranny, mass poverty, and imperialism (exploitation by external powers). As discussed above, the transition process has been characterised by ‘crossing the Rubicon’ – the introduction of policies and practices into the first world, that were formerly limited, for the most part, to the third world.

Thus debt bondage to the IMF crossed the Rubicon, enabled by the collapse-bailout scam. In turn, mass poverty is crossing that same Rubicon, due to austerity measures imposed by the IMF, with its new bond-holding powers. Imperialism is also crossing the Rubicon, as the first world comes under the exploitative control of banksters and their bureaucracies, a power nexus that is external to all national identities. Unsurprisingly, police state tyranny is also crossing the Rubicon: the imposition of third world poverty levels requires third world methods of repression.

The anti-globalisation movement can be taken as the beginning of popular resistance to the process of regime change. Similarly, the police response to the Seattle anti-globalisation demonstrations, in November 1999, can be taken as the ‘crossing of the Rubicon’ for police state tyranny. The excessive and arbitrary violence of that response – including such things as holding people’s eyes open and spraying pepper into them – was unprecedented against non-violent demonstrators in a first world nation.

Ironically, that police response, particularly as it was so widely publicised, actually strengthened the anti-globalisation movement. As demonstrations grew in size and strength, the police response grew still more violent. A climax of sorts was reached in Genoa, in July 2001, when the levels of violence on both sides began to resemble almost a guerilla war.

In those days the anti-globalisation movement was dominating the international news pages, and opposition to globalisation was reaching massive proportions. The visible movement was only the tip of an anti-systemic iceberg. In a very real sense, general popular sentiment in the first world was beginning to take a radical turn. Movement leaders were now thinking in terms of an anti-capitalist movement. There was a political volatility in the air, a sense that, just maybe possibly, enlightened popular sentiment might succeed in shifting the course of events.

All of that changed on September 11, 2001, the day the towers came down. The anti-globalisation movement, along with globalisation itself, disappeared almost totally from public consciousness on that fateful day. Suddenly it was a whole new global scenario, a whole new media circus – with a new enemy, and a new kind of war, a war without end, a war against phantoms, a war against ‘terrorism’.

Earlier we saw how the orchestrated financial collapse of September 2008 enabled certain ongoing projects to be rapidly accelerated, such as the dismantlement of sovereignty, and the imposition of austerity. Similarly, the events of September 2001 enabled certain ongoing projects to be greatly accelerated, such as the abandonment of civil liberties and international law.

Before the towers had even come down, the ‘Patriot Act’ had already been drafted, proclaiming in no uncertain terms that the police state was here (in the USA) in force and here to stay – the Bill of Rights was null and void. Before long, similar ‘anti-terrorist’ legislation had been adopted throughout the first world. If any anti-systemic movement were to again raise its head in the first world (as it did, for example, recently in Greece), arbitrary police powers could be brought to bear – as much as might be necessary – to put the resistance down. No popular movement would be allowed to derail the banksters’ regime-change designs. The anti-globalisation movement had been shouting, ‘This is what real democracy looks like’. With 9/11, the banksters replied: ‘This is what real oppression looks like’.

The events of 9/11 led directly to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and in general helped create a climate where invasions of sovereign nations could be readily justified, with one excuse or another. International law was to be as thoroughly abandoned as was civil liberties. Just as all restraint was removed from domestic police interventions, so was all restraint being removed from geopolitical military interventions. Nothing was to stand in the way of the banksters’ regime-change agenda.

The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society… dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values… this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behaviour… Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the stepping-stones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society… In addition, it may be possible – and tempting – to exploit for strategic political purposes the fruits of research on the brain and on human behaviour.
– Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970
The Post-Capitalist Era – New Myths for a New Culture

2012 might not be the exact year, but it’s difficult to see the endgame lasting much beyond that – and the masters of the universe love symbolism, as with 911 (both in Chile and in Manhattan), KLA 007, and others. 2012 is loaded with symbolism, eg. the Mayan Calendar, and the Internet is buzzing with various 2012-related prophecies, survival strategies, anticipated alien interventions, etc. And then there is the Hollywood film, 2012, which explicitly portrays the demise of most of humanity, and the pre-planned salvation of a select few. One never knows with Hollywood productions, what is escapist fantasy, and what is aimed at preparing the public mind symbolically for what is to come.

Whatever the exact date, all the threads will come together, geopolitically and domestically, and the world will change. It will be a new era, just as capitalism was a new era after aristocracy, and the Dark Ages followed the era of the Roman Empire. Each era has its own structure, its own economics, its own social forms, and its own mythology. These things must relate to one another coherently, and their nature follows from the fundamental power relationships and economic circumstances of the system.

Whenever there is a change of era, the previous era is always demonised in a new mythology. In the Garden of Eden story the serpent is demonised – a revered symbol in paganism, the predecessor to monotheism. With the rise of European nation states, the Catholic Church was demonised, and Protestantism introduced. When republics came along, the demonisation of monarchs was an important part of the process. In the post-2012 world, democracy and national sovereignty will be demonised. This will be very important, in getting people to accept arbitrary totalitarian rule…

In those terrible dark days, before the blessed unification of humanity, anarchy reigned in the world. One nation would attack another, no better than predators in the wild. Nations had no long-term coherence; voters would swing from one party to another, keeping governments always in transition and confusion. How did anyone ever think that masses of semi-educated people could govern themselves, and run a complex society? Democracy was an ill-conceived experiment that led only to corruption and chaotic governance. How lucky we are to be in this well-ordered world, where humanity has finally grown up, and those with the best expertise make the decisions for the whole globe.

Capitalism is about growth, progress, and change. Under capitalism the virtues of ambition, initiative, and competitiveness are praised, because those virtues serve the dynamics of capitalism. People are encouraged to always accumulate more, and never be satisfied with what they have. Under capitalism, people need to have a bit of liberty, and a bit of prosperity, so that the dynamics of capitalism can operate. Without some liberty, ambition cannot be pursued; without some prosperity, how could accumulation be pursued? In the post-capitalist world, the capitalist virtues will be demonised. This will be very important, in getting people to accept poverty and regimentation…

The pursuit of money is the root of all evil, and the capitalist system was inherently corrupt and wasteful. Anarchy reined in the marketplace, as corporations blindly pursued profit, with no concern for human needs or for the Earth. How much more sensible are our production brigades, producing only what is needed, and using only what is sustainable. Capitalism encouraged greed and consumption; people struggled to compete with one another, to ‘get ahead’ in the rat race. How much wiser we are now, to live within our ration quotas, and to accept our assigned duties, whatever they might be, in service to humanity.

In this regime change, ushering in the post-capitalist era, we’re seeing a conscious orchestration of economics, politics, geopolitics, and mythology – as one coordinated project. A whole new reality is being created, a whole new global culture. When it comes down to it, the ability to transform culture is the ultimate form of power. In only a single generation, a new culture becomes ‘the way things are’. And what, we might inquire, might stand in the way of any future manipulations of the cultural regime that the bankster royal family might contemplate?

Ever since public education was introduced, the state and the family have competed to control childhood conditioning – and it is in childhood that culture is transmitted to the next generation. In the micromanaged post-capitalist future, we’ll most likely see the ‘final solution’ of social control, which is for the state to monopolise child raising. This would eliminate from society the parent-child bond, and hence family-related bonds in general. No longer is there a concept of relatives, just fellow members of the hive. The family must be demonised. Already, here in Ireland, there are daily TV spots dramatising the plight of children who are being abused or neglected by their parents…

How scary were the old days, when unlicensed, untrained couples had total control over vulnerable children, behind closed doors, with whatever neuroses, addictions, or perversions the parents happened to possess. How did this vestige of patriarchal slavery, this safe-house den of child abuse, continue so long to exist, and not be recognised for what it was? How much better off we are now, with children being raised scientifically, by trained staff, where they are taught discipline and healthy values.

[SkapySisy]

pawlak what do you have to say about sufism?

[Eugen80]

KIng of the central banks (BIS) Calls for Hyperinflationary Depression?

#############
http://www.thedailybell.com/3339/BIS...ary-Depression
##############

The Bank for International Settlements Sunday issued an oblique endorsement of coordinated action by the world's largest central banks to ease funding conditions for banks. "A freezing of interbank markets in major funding currencies, as during the recent crisis, may require the ability to supply official liquidity in major currencies in an elastic manner," the BIS wrote in its regular quarterly report." – MarketWatch

Dominant Social Theme: Inflate! And everything will work out.

Free-Market Analysis: We've already indicated that we believe the Anglosphere power elite is attempting to create a kind of Great Depression in order to ease the path of world government. This squib of an article in MarketWatch (excerpted above) – unnoticed by most of the mainstream press – only reconfirms our impression.

It endorses recent "coordinated" central banking loosening. But it does more: "A freezing of interbank markets in major funding currencies, as during the recent crisis, may require the ability to supply official liquidity in major currencies in an elastic manner."

Think about that. The BIS, whatever it is, is all for printing lots of money. And the BIS is no small-time trade group. It is perhaps the most powerful (and least known) global business body in the world. Its mysteries are manifold. its workings are well-hidden.

Of course, somebody actually set up the Bank for International Settlements in the late 1930s. And since then someone has set up or helped set up about 200 central banks around the world, many of them reporting directly to the BIS.

But who? And how did it happen? Dunno.

Who speaks to the head of a state, asking him or her to set up a central bank? Dunno. Do you?

Why is that Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq have central banks when they didn't before, or not the kind they do now? Did you read about it?

Meh ... this ruinous financial system is not a plant or a tree. It did not grow spontaneously. It did not grow naturally. And we would submit to you that those who created it know what they're doing.

The key as always is to pretend that one does NOT know. The key is to create cognitive dissonance. Even today, if you asked the average person-on-the-street if the powers-that-be are trying to create a Depression (let alone a hyperinflationary one), you would get the ol' crazy look, as in ... "What is this fellow ... nuts?"

But, no, nothing nutty about it. The European Union and the euro are grinding a whole European generation into dust. China's burgeoning middle class is about to get walloped if China ends up in a proverbial hard landing, as well it might. The US has NEVER recovered from the disaster of the mid-2000s (first decade) nor shall it for the foreseeable future.

Into this morass steps the BIS, with its suggestion (above) that further monetary inflation is the only viable solution to the problem that central banking itself has created.

Smile ... and nod! Don't acknowledge the reality that the ruin is a central banking ruin. The monetary decay is the result of a monopoly fiat. The great dollar expansion yet to come is also a direct outcome of the current system that was put in place after World War II.

No, it's not hard to discern what's going on if one simply disassociates oneself from the endless nattering of the mainstream media. Analyze what IS instead of what is SUGGESTED and the reality shall gradually become clear.

DB's manifestly accurate High Alert (published some four years ago now) was written because we were tracking what was actually happening to the world's economy instead of what was being reported ....

A financial hurricane is washing over America and, to a lesser extent, the entire West. To label it the "downstroke" of a super business cycle does not do it justice. These events occur in cycles, with the last one taking place in the 1970s — a mild storm compared to what is occurring today. ...

A strong inflation, even a soft hyperinflation, already has a grip on Western currencies, most notably in the United States — as anyone who buys groceries is aware. The dollar's plunge may be delayed by a kind of "race to the bottom" as other central banks adjust their currencies to reflect the weakness of the dollar. ...

In his "Great American Depression," free-market economist Murray Rothbard explains the ramifications of hyperinflation as follows: "Hyperinflation, on any count, is far worse than any depression: It destroys the currency — the lifeblood of the economy; it ruins and shatters the middle class and all fixed income groups; it wreaks havoc unbounded. And furthermore it leads finally to unemployment and lower living standards since there is little point in working when earned income depreciates by the hour."

(You can read the full book online here.)

THIS is what the BIS seems to have in mind. This is the fate that has been decreed, apparently, by those who want to crush middle classes around the world in order to create a "new world order." Out of chaos ... order. It is quite clear. Follow what IS rather than what you are being TOLD.

The BIS wants to inflate. it ENDORSES inflation. The proximate cause is the unraveling of the current financial system. But it is "their" system. They made it. They watched it rise and fall. It was obvious that it could not end in anything other than a massive contraction and perhaps hyperinflation.

The contraction – incipient Depression – has already taken place. Best case, the powers-that-be would stop trying to prop up failing markets and let the downturn have its way as quickly as possible. This they will not do. Instead, the next phase of an increasingly horrific scenario is about to unfold.

Rather than let the market alone, the elites are apparently readying massive central bank monetary inflation around the world. That's the real message of this innocent little squib of an article, so far as we can tell.

The BIS, in its inoffensive way, is signaling that the current level of disaster and despair is not good enough. The agony is not sufficient. The new world order is to be birthed on the graves of millions, and nothing but hyperinflation (and/or war) will produce the sufficient level of chaos. Here's some more from the article:

The U.S. Federal Reserve 10 days ago agreed to expand, and reduce the cost of, multilateral swap lines with five other large central banks, notably the European Central Bank, in an effort to restore access to dollar funding for European banks. Euro-zone banks used the new facility to borrow $50.7 billion at a rate of 0.59% at the first operation after the announcement.

The BIS's essay was its latest in a series analyzing the concept of global liquidity, and focused again on the interplay between official liquidity, that is, created by central banks, and the far greater liquidity created by the private sector on the basis of central bank money--the so-called money multiplier.

The essay observed that much is still unknown on this topic, particularly on the degree to which the accumulation of foreign exchange reserves by central banks, and their subsequent reinvestment, can affect the creation of private liquidity.

The BIS noted that the priority of policymakers should be to mitigate surges in the overall level of global liquidity. It said the new "Basel III" rules on capital and liquidity should help this trend of "counter-cyclical" policymaking.

Do you appreciate what you have just read, dear reader? Do you understand the black maw of the vicious, velvet trap that is now being readied? Unlimited money printing is to be aimed at a grievously wounded world – and the antidote is to be MORE GLOBAL REGULATION.

Over and over we see this sort of generic dominant social theme in action. Having unleashed a fear-based promotion (a new Great Depression), the elite now suggests that only their international agencies can rectify it.

So let the central banks print away! The regulators have figured it out. They've put into place something called Basel III. This "solution" has been initiated by the same banking community that has hollowed out the life savings of hundreds of millions; it is supposed to ensure that hyperinflation is damped and the velocity of money is damped.

Here at the Daily Bell we quantify the fear-based memes of the elite and their efficacy. We've kept track not only of the successes but of the failures as well. And in our view, the failures are mounting up.

Most recently we suggested that the current chaos in the Eurozone was yet another elite failure – that ideally, Britain wouldn't have had to pull away from the euro but would have drawn closer to the EU.

In fact, Britain's pullback itself may be not only an acknowledgement of the troubles the elites are having in creating their one-world order, it may also be a STRATEGY – one creating a favorite tool, the Hegelian Dialectic.

That's how you move the socio-political discussion in the "right" direction. You need opposing sides to create first a thesis and an antithesis and then, finally ... a synthesis. In this case, the current economic chaos is the thesis, and the BIS's idea of money printing is to be the anti-thesis.

What is to be the synthesis? Well ... perhaps one prints (relatively) slowly, at least at first. Of course, speed is relative. What is "slow" can soon become "faster." The Hegelian Dialectic, in fact, is likely merely a trick designed to create a false sense of satisfaction in those who participate or follow but do not have an understanding of the grand design. No, from our point of view, the "controllers" are making it clear what is to be the next step of the "great game."

Conclusion: Can you hear the noise? It is not a train headed down the track. It is not Superman flying through the air faster than the speed of sound. It is a printing press, running hard toward ruin.


It is a money printing press, running hard toward ruin.

It is a money printing press, running hard toward ruin.

[sanddrareyk]

I'm not Joining the CT Party ;-). Watched a short clip on the Banking Scam - Good stuff. May Allah save us from all deceptions either hidden or apparent Ameen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9IH-...layer_embedded

[DesautocaD]

BIS Promotes Asian Financial Crisis?
##########
http://www.thedailybell.com/3352/BIS...nancial-Crisis
#########

AUSTRALIA'S key trading region in the Asia Pacific is the most vulnerable part of the world to a sudden capital strike by global banks, a leading economic authority has warned. New research from the influential Bank for International Settlements shows emerging markets in Asia would be heavily exposed if there were a credit crunch. – Sidney Morning Herald

Dominant Social Theme: We are giving people ample warning they ought to get out of the way.

Free-market Analysis: The secretive Swiss-based Bank for International Settlements has just warned that Asia is vulnerable to a catastrophic "global credit crunch," according to the Sidney Morning Herald (see above). We translate it thusly: The world is HEADING for an Asian financial crisis.

Yes, increasingly, as believers in directed history (conspiratorial history), we would venture that a BIS warning is something of a harbinger of catastrophic events to come. Too many people don't pay attention to the BIS, which is perhaps the most powerful body in the world. They should.

The Asia Pacific region has proven vulnerable to financial crises in the past, most notably in the later 1990s. The reasons for the collapse, the BIS indicates, is the same as previously, during the late 1990s – the rapid withdrawal of bank investment from the region. Here's some more from the article:

Asia Pacific is the most vulnerable part of the world to a sudden capital strike by global banks, a leading economic authority has warned. New research from the influential Bank for International Settlements shows emerging markets in Asia would be heavily exposed if there were a credit crunch ...

While Australia's trade with Europe is minimal, investors fear the domestic economy could be damaged if the euro zone crisis triggered a withdrawal from Asia by global banks, with civil unrest and a break-up of the European Union still a possibility.

In its report published today, the Bank for International Settlements says Asia's economies obtained far more debt from foreign lenders than other regions, and a large share of it was short-term debt.

Based on these two measures, it said: 'Asia-Pacific appears to be the region most exposed to sudden capital withdrawals.

It's not hard to hear what the BIS is telling us, if we listen. But in the modern world, listening is hard to do. In fact, it is difficult to remind oneself of the cognitive dissonance of agencies like the BIS. These facilities are often likely set up by the Anglosphere power elite to do exactly the opposite of their stated goals and objectives.

One example is the Federal Reserve that is supposed to stabilize the dollar and "control" monetary inflation. In fact, it has done exactly the opposite, and the dollar has lost almost all its value as a result. Additionally, central banks are often considered to be "inflation fighters" generically. But in fact ,a central bank prints money and thus is an inflation PRODUCER. In the long term it seemingly cannot be otherwise.

The BIS operates in reverse, too, in our opinion. It is supposed to organize prosperity around the world through canny money power structures. But all one need do is look at the world's current state of affairs to know that the BIS has not succeeded and is, in fact, probably a big part of the problem.

Why are power elite agencies so secretive, and why do they operate in reverse? Because the modern day elite conspiracy is aimed at creating one-world government. Thus, the elites have set up a number of facilities to create sociopolitical and economic chaos. The entire world's financial infrastructure has been designed to crash and fail on a regular basis, it would seem. And it does.

It's not hard to understand if one takes the proverbial step back. But most people, in the past anyway, couldn't do this because the entire panoply of the Western world's informational programming was aimed at informing people that Money Power was a benevolent entity.

Of course it is not. Money Power is exercised in the world today for one reason so far as we can tell: to create world government. The very nature of Money Power as exercised by the Anglosphere elites is subversive. The elites have created an almost seamless economic engine that is driving the world toward global governance. The BIS is a powerful part of this engine.

Just the other day, the BIS warned that the quantitative easing measures adopted by the central bank of England would not be sufficient. And it has also warned that central banks around the world ought to consider a kind of united easing that is probably unprecedented in central banking history. You can see our article on that here: BIS Calls for Hyperinflationary Depression?

With increasing frenetic energy, BIS officialdom seems to be issuing warnings about where the world is headed. In rapid-fire succession, BIS publications have informed us that it may be necessary for the world's central banks to act in concert to inflate dramatically, that the Bank of England's quantitative easing may not be sufficient and that Asia is vulnerable to the kind of financial crash that occurred in the 1990s.

Conclusion: We are reminded of the commercial: "When E.F. Hutton talks, people listen." Only in this case, it's the BIS, perhaps, that we should be listening to. In our humble opinion, the BIS may be busy (one way or another) organizing the very events about which it's warning.

[apodildNoli]

#################

http://www.thedailybell.com/3358/Smo...ity-of-the-IMF

####################

Brussels accord on the verge of collapse ... Some of the world's most powerful investment banks were downgraded by ratings agency Fitch as Germany's cherished European fiscal compact appeared to be unravelling. Mario Draghi delivers a speech in Berlin on Thursday. Draghi said there's "no external savior" for heavily indebted governments in the eurozone debt crisis ... Meanwhile, Germany's attempt to save the Eurozone was hanging in the balance as Hungary and the Czech Republic claimed it would be damaging and protesters in Warsaw demanded Poland stands firm against Angela Merkel. – UK Telegraph

Dominant Social Theme: It's all happening so fast. This is how a regional economy dies. Let's put a global one in its place.

Free-Market Analysis: If one examines the rush of events surrounding the unraveling of the European Union, it becomes more and more difficult to believe it is merely a series of coincidences. We've covered this in other articles, but what's going on continues to affirm our belief that this is a kind of planned crisis.

The elites' "directed history" in our view has been taking place for at least 100-150 years. Central banking gave it a boost because it is easy to stage historical events when one has virtually unlimited money. The goal, of course, is global governance. And when it comes to the EU, its consolidation helps the cause, but so may its breakup.

Of course, we have written that consolidation is the preferable course of events. And we have no reason to change our mind. We believe that the British/EU split was not something the elites sought. It came about because of the Internet era and the growing anger in Britain over the expansion of EU rules, regulations and taxes. You can see an article on this here: 500 Year Old Global Roll-Up Founders?

In today's other article, we pointed out that chaos also suits the aims of the power elite that wants to run the world. If they cannot have a full-blown European empire, they will settle for part of one and a good deal of chaos. The chaos seems to be kicking in – see the downgrades in the Telegraph article excerpt above.

But it is not just ratings that are being cut. The solutions being floated by the EU Commissars predictably are running into stiff resistance throughout Europe. The resistance is patchy yet, but it's building. More from the article:

Amid fresh warnings that Europe is triggering a 1930s-style global depression, the German chancellor faced open rebellion against the key plank of her Brussels accord. The leaders of Hungary and the Czech Republic told a joint conference in Budapest they were ready to reject the planned treaty changes

and implied move towards a centralised tax system. Czech prime minister Petr Necas said he was "convinced that tax harmonisation would not mean anything good for us".

Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban said that central Europe had the potential to become the most competitive region in Europe. "The only kind of co-operation we can have with the eurozone is one which does not damage Hungary's competitiveness," he said.

Poles marched under banners that read: "We want sovereignty, not the euro." They were protesting against the Brussels deal that could see EU countries, including those outside the eurozone, face penalties for breaking tough centralised spending laws. Britain used its veto in Brussels, sparking an intense backlash. Ireland and Sweden are also nervous about the fiscal pact ...

And more ... it is not just the countries and rating agencies that are providing pushback to the grand European experiment. The European Central Bank itself is indicating that it will not do the one thing that Brussells Eurocrats are clamoring for – print money to buy up Euro-debt.

Mario Draghi, himself, the head of the European Central Bank (ECB), has said that while the ECB has begun a limited buying program of sorts, the program is "neither eternal nor infinite." According to the EU article, there is little that Draghi believes he can do to restore growth. "Sustainable growth can be achieved only by undertaking deep structural reforms that have been procrastinated [upon] for too long."

In America, the Obama Administration has indicated that the US is not in the position to make Europe whole, either. One by one, easy-money solutions are being scaled back. What's left? The IMF, of course. (See other article, this issue.)

One watches these manipulations mouth agape. The globe's largest institutions are evidently and obviously controlled from the top. Until this last century – until what we call the Internet Reformation became evident – very few had any idea what these institutions actually did, let alone how they were controlled.

But all that has changed and the result is forcing changes as well to the way the elites do business. Instead of using dominant social themes, they are increasingly resorting to legislative force and outright military and police intimidation. It shows us that the "bad old days" never really went away.

Those at the top have without a doubt created the world's current problems. Central banking is nothing more than monetary price-fixing. But it has been promoted throughout the world by the "best and brightest" as something else.

Price fixing is always ruinous. And when the target of price-fixing is money-stuff itself, the eventual result is a series of booms and busts eventually leading to a significant depression. That's what has happened now. To believe it is merely chance that has brought us here would be naïve, considering that the current global economy is highly controlled and that the creation of money itself is not a free-market function.

The plan to continue centralizing the world's economy seems obvious (to us anyway). What is not so obvious is whether such a plan will come to fruition in an era where the strategies of the elites have been exposed in great detail and disseminated around the world digitally via the 'Net.

From our point of view, the setbacks are piling up. Global warming, Peak Oil, the war on terror and many other elite dominant social themes are having increasing difficulty finding traction. And now the Eurozone itself is proving increasingly difficult to hold together.

Conclusion: Of course one can see the gears moving. The union is pulling apart; the major actors are playing their new roles, perhaps ones that will abet the breakup. Meanwhile, the IMF apparently is to emerge as the savior, or that's how it seems now. We are being positioned to recognize such an inevitability; the major question is whether the positioning will work as well in this century as last.

[KeettyGlots]

I have posted several articles from ( www.thedailybell.com ) . Recently , someone points out one big flaw in their philisophy. Check these links.


######################
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/...he-daily-bell/

The problem is not debt, its interest
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/...-its-interest/

#################

http://www.henrymakow.com/austrian_e..._jewish_e.html

Ron Paul's "Austrian" Jewish Economics

Whether a currency is backed by gold makes no difference. As long as we pay interest, it is still Illuminati Jewish economics. The real alternative is interest-free currency.

by Anthony Migchels
(henrymakow.com)

As we know, the Illuminati Jewish Money Power likes playing the Hegelian Dialectic game and controlling both sides of the conflict. Clearly, they will have their answer ready when their Fiat Empire comes to it's end.

That answer may be Austrian Economics. Here's why:

Murray Rothbard was a son of poor Jewish immigrants from Poland. Ludwig von Mises was a son of a wealthy Jewish financier family from what is now the Ukraine. When von Mises came to the US, he was set up with a grant from the Rockefellers.

Austrian Economics correctly identifies the manipulation of the money supply as the cause of the boom/bust, a.k.a business cycle. This is the little bit of truth necessary for the rest of the disinformation to have credibility. However, they completely ignore the wealth transfer through interest, which is of much greater significance.

THE GRIP OF INTEREST

Interest has always been the Money Power's main tool. They took power by creating wars, financing both sides, and having Governments go deeply into debt.

This is the key issue: interest is a wealth transfer from the poorest 80% to the richest 10%.

The global numbers are not known, but in Germany $1 billion per day is paid by the poorest 80% and extrapolated to the world this means the Plutocracy drain anywhere between $5 trillion and $10 trillion dollars per year.

The US Govt loses up to $700 billion per year in debt service. That's a TARP every year. All for money that was printed the minute it was borrowed. But Austrian Economics will 'fix' that problem: we'll be paying it for Gold-based credit instead.

To add insult to injury: the boom/bust cycle will not change, which is the basic case for gold. Gold has been the standard for a long time and it didn't stop the Money Power from creating asset bubbles and deflationary busts.

Even under a full reserve banking system it is quite easy to manipulate the volume in circulation when you control a large part of the World's gold reserves.

So all in all its fair to say that Austrian Economics is 'Jewish' Economics.

RON PAUL

All this has become relevant because of Ron Paul, of course. But Paul is not the man patriots think he is. In 2001, he said, There's nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency.... The effort in recent decades to unify government surveillance over all world trade and international financial transactions through the UN, IMF, World Bank, WTO, ICC, the OECD, and the Bank of International Settlements can never substitute for a peaceful world based on true free trade, freedom of movement, a single but sound market currency, and voluntary contracts with private property rights.... The ultimate solution will only come with the rejection of fiat money worldwide, and a restoration of commodity money. Commodity money if voluntarily and universally accepted could give us a single world currency requiring no money managers, no manipulators orchestrating a man-made business cycle with rampant price inflation." -- Ron Paul, Congressional Record, March 13, 2001

http://libertyrevival.wordpress.com/...orld-currency/

Paul says Gold will keep Government spending in check. He wants to cut Government spending, but is unable to explain how this would lead to different results than what we have seen in Greece: an imploding economy with a withering tax base and even higher deficits as the predictable result.

In the debate you see the Keynes-Austrian Dialectic: Spending versus Austerity. Both ignore interest, which is the hidden common ground.

People like Webster Tarpley and Paul Krugman want the Government to reflate the economy. This is correct, but the risk is it will kill the patient which is suffering from intolerable debt service levels as it is. They both skillfully avoid the monetary system itself, let alone interest. That's why they can't really put up a fight against the Austrians.
If the economy were reflated with either debt free money, or interest free credit the problem would be over instantly.

It is too bad Ron Paul has managed to hijack the Patriot Movement. His constitutionalism, his peaceful intentions (we'll have to see how they would work out in practice), his $1 trillion austerity drive combined with his modest demeanor have managed to convince many discerning and well meaning people.

His rise and the sycophantic worship that he receives is eerily similar to that of Barack Obama in 2008.

But as long as we don't understand money and the all importance of interest, people like Obama and Paul will continue to fool us with their Voodoo- and Jewish Economics.

CONCLUSION

During modern history the financiers behind the throne clearly subjugated Governments. They don't need the State. To them it is a competitor, a dangerous one too. They will use it as long as they can control it, but they are trying to consolidate their financial power in their World Government.

Social Credit is the best debt free currency I know of: it's a Greenback created by Govt, given to the people to spend into circulation, instead of Govt. In that way the money is located at the base of the supply line. People know where to spend the money better than govt.

Meanwhile, the gold versus fiat narrative is a distraction which allows them to sabotage all meaningful monetary reform. We need a debt-free, interest-free currency which would lead to political freedom and the put humanity back on the path to fulfilling its Divine destiny.

--
Austrian Economists suffer when confronted with the interest issue. Here are two recent examples:
What Gary North is not telling you about Interest
Discussing Gold and Interest with the Daily Bell

Anthony Migchels is an Interest-Free Currency activist and founder of the Gelre, the first Regional Currency in the Netherlands. You can read all of his articles on his blog Real Currencies

Mutual credit, the astonishingly simple truth about money creation
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/...oney-creation/

The problem is not debt, its interest
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/...-its-interest/

###############

[SNUfR8uI]

Bro Pawlak, what is it with your loony conspiracies about how we are all debt slaves and that we are being watched while in the toilet and all that nonsense?

[Orefsmisits]

###########
http://graysinfo.blogspot.com/2010/0...ravelling.html
##########

re We Being Ruled By A Travelling Politburo?


Politburo: “the executive committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and of certain other nations”

( http://www.yourdictionary.com/politburo )


We see many leaders of nations travelling to different countries each year to hold meetings. Example: The G20 and the G8, the most recent example was in Toronto, Canada, where many of them congregated to discuss World Policy. In fact a number of media outlets, were calling this gathering a, “World Summit.” Which begs the question: When did the peoples’ of many of these different countries who still have a supposed “parliamentary system” hand over their national sovereignty to a travelling politburo? Are we being conditioned to accept some form of “World Government?” Or is it already here? After all, we have a “World Bank,” a “World Health Organization,” a “World Court,” an “International Monetary Fund,” which imposes austerity programmes on elected governments, so perhaps the world dictatorship has already arrived. But, we did not notice it happening. But, I digress. Now back to questions about the travelling politburo.



Are decisions being made and policies being designed to be implemented without discussion in national parliaments of the free world? Communist China is a dictatorship, yet it was a participant in these discussions by the travelling politburo. In fact its leader was an honored guest at a dinner put on by the Canadian government and attended by some powerful business interests. [1]


And the un-elected President of Europe, Herman Van Rompuy, was also a participant at these meetings. The Brussels Journal had this to say about the European Union (E.U)


“Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.” [2]


One might ask the question: Are these heads of state giving up some of their national sovereignty? After all, whose interests are being served when these “leaders” of various countries are making decisions outside their parliaments without holding debates in their own countries about policies being enacted at these G8 and G20 meetings? And why are the parliamentary oppositions in all these countries not asking these questions? And one might ask: Why are the investigative media not asking pertinent questions about these meetings? Who is behind them? Who arranged them? Who started them? Are there other forces, unelected, behind the scenes the real powers that be? I believe, we need answers to these questions.


Other questions that could be asked are; why is there no clamp down on offshore tax havens? Another question: are these tax havens the places where many of the financial elites keep their money? We have seen huge amounts of the peoples’ tax dollars being used to bail out, oops, I mean stimulate financial institutions that in fact caused the present financial crisis. And some of these financial institutions have subsidiaries in offshore tax havens. But, instead, these so called leaders are talking about “deficits,” and “paying down the debt,” living within our means,” and all the other slogans they use to put the boots to the taxpayers. Meanwhile, the un-elected banksters are advising them on “monetary policy.”


“In recent months, G20 countries have submitted their economic plans to the IMF - which would then assess what the net impact would be on the global economy.” [3]



And “global economic governance” is now being facilitated.


“The Group of Twenty ("G-20") nations, the new Financial Stability Board ("FSB"), and the International Monetary Fund ("IMF") are progressing on two fronts: the monitoring and revision of national and regional economic plans to facilitate global economic governance…” [4]


And so the un-elected “advisers” for “global governance” have their travelling political politburo puppets making the decisions that are contrary to freedom and democracy.


Stephen J Gray
June 29, 2010.

Endnotes:



[1] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1617411/



[2] http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865



[3] http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...do_better.html



[4]http://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/spotlight_on_sovereignty/g20-and-imf-officials-institutionalize-economic-global-governance



Further reading and links to articles below:
Bilderberg 2010: What we have learned

A huge agenda of global issues was crammed into four days of 'secret' meetings by a mysterious group of power brokers. But who elected them and why are we paying for them?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/...ilderberg-2010

THE BILDERBERG PLANNING SESSION ENDS: WHAT'S IN STORE?

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_323_29027.php