Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Do apes have fingerprints like us? I was thinking if we were from apes, the fingerprints were not carried across into the human; thus disapproving evolution? I know my logic is a bit twisted but you get my drift?
75:4. Nay, We are able to put Together in perfect order The very tips of his fingers. BTW Is it right for "modern" tafseers to interpret this ayah to the miracle of fingerprints? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
There are some Muslims who think evolution theory is true and it is okay to believe it and still be a Muslim if they believe that Allah caused it.
However the theory has many problems with it....when these darwinists explain it, they always say you do not understand when you disagree with them. They give things like nature a personality in their books, they say things like natural selection did this or that, or random mutations just happened to create this or that. It sounds like make believe to me. If you look at it wholistically...they say that the soil has little millions of creatures (microbes) in a spoon full of soil...without these we would get not plants. Tree and plant roots help keep the soil firm, if you chop away the trees and take away the plants, when it rains it washes away all the soil and can cause floods and mud slides. All the trees and plants help to maintain the atmosphere and the air, temperature of the earth. Now given all this we should ask how did the first plants establish themselves? Did microbes already exist in the soil, how come the soil was not washed away with the rains? What was the atmosphere of the earth like without any plants? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
if all life evolved because of miniscule chance mutations, then we would see un-countable fossils in varying stages of evolution.
we would also see uncountable fossils with mutations that did not quite make it and came to a dead end. for example - for an animal to have an eye, it would need everything else associated with the eye such as the eyelids, eye sockets, optical nerves, the eye itself etc. now if this through stages of genetic mutation, then we should see fossils that mutated in this way but did not mutate all the way up to having an eye. there should be fossils with just eye sockets but no eyes. eyelids but no eyes. eye balls but no optical nerves. etc. this is just a crude example from the top of my own head. the point is where are all these different degrees of genetic mutations that we are told about? this planet should be buried in them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
if all life evolved because of miniscule chance mutations, then we would see un-countable fossils in varying stages of evolution. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I evoled in to a Dinosaur |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
This is not correct. The conditions for organic remains to become fossilized aren't that common. Otherwise, you'd find fossils pretty much anywhere you dig, but that's clearly not the case. have they found transitional fossils that show genetic mutations within a species which could then lead to the evolution of that species into a different species? |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
i am not much read up on this subject. Also, take some time to understand the scientific method, and what it really means when the scientific community refers to something as a "theory". |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Holy Qur'aan 75 ; 1 - 10 , [ Revealed In The Year 614 A.D. ] Al Qiyaamah ~ The Standing , Resurrection , ( Is speaking about ~ Muhammad Swears By Al Qiyaamah ~ And He Doesn't Swear By The Person , Who Constanly Blames Another , Or Accuses Himself ~ Does The Enosite Think , That The Heavenly Host Can't Gather His Bones ? ~ The Heavenly Host Also Reconstructed His Banaanah ~ The Enosites Wants To Deny The Day Of Resurrection ~ He Asks , Ayyaan Is The Day Of Resurrection ? ~ When The Sight Is Dazzled And The Moon And The Sun Are Gathered Together ~ The Enosite Will Want To Know Where Is The Nafarr ? Erm explain |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
=vagabond Frankly, the anti-evolution arguments which state that there are no plausible transitional fossils are outdated .. and perhaps even embarrassing. Can you expand on this. I find it amazing and embarrassing that atheist scientists can with a straight face and in all seriousness claim to give us an explanation of life via their 'findings' claiming that it all happened by itself.
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|