[leadmoffer]

Assalamualaikum,

Can we work get this comment out of wikipedia ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fazail-e-Amal

The book is also known to have loads of Hadith that are not sahih and some stories of (they think are) great men and can do things not possible with a normal human being. Which makes this book a very dicy and not an authentic book to believe for most of the sects in Islam.

[nuncEtedben]

Assalamualaikum,

Can we work get this comment out of wikipedia ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fazail-e-Amal

The book is also known to have loads of Hadith that are not sahih and some stories of (they think are) great men and can do things not possible with a normal human being. Which makes this book a very dicy and not an authentic book to believe for most of the sects in Islam.

Who cares?

[Wdlglivi]

I'm pretty sure that will be removed anyway on the grounds of not sounding encyclopedic (at all).

[Stappipsy]

I'm pretty sure that will be removed anyway on the grounds of not sounding encyclopedic (at all).

Well it is still there, and now the bold text has become plain text just to look more authentic. Not sure if and why we are helpless here.

[RotsLoado]

"The book is also known to have loads of Hadith that are not sahih and some stories of (they think are) great men and can do things not possible with a normal human being. Which makes this book a very dicy and not an authentic book to believe for most of the sects in Islam."

If you read this statement carefully then you will realize that there is a negation of the Qur'an and the Sahih books of hadith in it. Why break your head over idiots?

[cefunonge]

Asslamualaikum,

The concerning comments somehow vanished. I am not sure who removes that and how does wiki updates work. I am happy about this alhumdullillah.