Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-23-2008, 06:41 AM | #23 |
|
|
|
01-23-2008, 05:39 PM | #25 |
|
|
|
01-23-2008, 08:45 PM | #26 |
|
May Allah Ta'la elevate his status in the akhira, and grant him Jannatul Firdous without reckoning, ameen. I heard that the great Shaykh performed his last salah before he passed away.
"Knowledge will be lost through the deaths of scholars." May Allah give us the tawfiq to utilise our time on this dunya wisely before we meet our Lord, ameen. Wassalam |
|
02-02-2008, 06:24 PM | #29 |
|
It is very sad this scholar passed away, I was in Bangladesh in Jul 2007, and whilst there from everyone I heard good word about this Shaykh people from different background always enquiring about his health, which amazed me, I really wanted to go an see the scholar but due to one reason or another never got round to it, my relatives who are related to him informed a great mass of people(estimated uver 800000) gathered for his funeral and came to pay last respect, The Village of Fultoli is overwhelmed with people grieving, I have been told Indian/Bangladesh border on that part of country letting anyone through as people coming from India too. |
|
02-02-2008, 07:51 PM | #30 |
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 06:09 PM | #31 |
|
Salaam. If the question was asked in a distasteful manner, then yes; one should refrain from that. Its not as if you can cause any harm/benefit to the actual sheikh! you will only harm yourself if you speak out against a Friend of Allah disrespectful |
|
02-08-2008, 11:27 PM | #32 |
|
Why are we quick to attack the brother, did he ask any incorrect factor about the sheikh (RA). The poster mentioned that 90% 0f the Ulema studied/followed/ and more then likely accepted his ideology. So if one is in doubt about his ideology then what harm is there in asking for clarification? Why are you now attacking sidi Julaybib. All he was doing was commenting against sidi Sunni_Muslim's aggressive questioning, which was very distasteful. Sure people can ask questions, ask for clarifications etc but there is no need to do so in an aggressive manner. May Allah SWT grant Hazrat Allamah Abdal Latif Fultali Al Naqshbandi (ra) jannatul firdaus. ps No one on this thread has claimed a 90% following, so which post was that from? |
|
06-04-2011, 09:31 PM | #33 |
|
I do like your following statement though: "It is because of people like Allamah Fultali (RAH) and Allamah Biscutti (RAH) that we in Bangladesh, have many people who are neutral in leaning." May Allah (SWA) grant him the highest maqam in jannah, next to the holy feet mubarak of our beloved rasool-e-akram (SAW) in whose love he spent his entire life - from his blessed birth to his noble departure. And may Allah (SWA) allow us to recieve the noble faiz of our great peer-o-murshid (ra). Ameen P.S. if you want any clarification on what i have just said or an expanded explanation about the aqaid of saheb qiblah, you may ask the imam at brick lane jamme masjid, which was his headquarter and the main arena of his mahfils when he was in london. you can also ask at darul hadis latifiah, his madrasah. I hope you do not get offended by my statement as it was not intended in that manner at all. Jazakallah. |
|
07-04-2012, 02:09 AM | #34 |
|
No, my brother, you have some serious misunderstandings on the aqaid of Hazrat Saheb Qiblah Fultoli (ra). Nevertheless, i hope you do correct them soon. Firstly, Hazrat Fultoli saheb Qiblah (ra) WAS a Barelwi, NOT a RIZVI.He was a Barelwi in that his silsila extended through Hazrat Shaheed Ahmed Barelwi (ra) and he is his follower. However, he is not a follower of Imam Ahmed Raza khan Barelwi (ra) in strict manner as he did not follow all his fatawa (e.g. the one on the kufr of the deobandi Ulama). He still respects the great Mujaddid Imam A'la Hazrat (ra) and I'm sure considered him an un-ending ocean of immense knowledge. He is also very much in favour of kitabs such as ja'al haq and Bahare Shariat which he placed amonst one of the best kitabs) and immensely respected Shuyookh from this camp, such as Hazrat Mufti Ahmad Yaar Khan Na'eemi (ra) and others. But, he also had great respect for the akabir of the deoband (as you have mentioned hazrat Boruni saheb (ra), such as Hazrat Qasim Nanotwi (ra), Hazrat Rasheed Ahmed Gonghoi saheb (ra), Hazrat Ashraf Alli Thanwi (ra), Shaikul Hadith Hazrat Zakariyya Khandlawi (ra), Hazrat Mufti Sohool Usmani (ra) etc. Although, it is arguable that he has more differences with the deobandi aqaid than with the rizvi (e.g. mawlid, mazaar building etc). In fact, i'm afraid you are totally incorrect about his view on ISTIGHATHA as he was totally in favour of it and you can see in so many of his lectures and his mawlid (salatus-salaam) gatherings such phrases being uttered frequently. In fact, he used to give lectures in favour of it (some of which i have myself) wherein he would quote such noble awliya such as Imam-ul A'zam (ra) etc using phrases of istigatha. However, he is strongly against ISMAIL DEHLAWI but it can be said without any doubt (with allah as my witness) that he was a true sufi waliullah in its true sense and represented all the awliya from the previous golden generations. In fact, has anyone seen his eldest son? Subhanallah, he (Hazrat Mawlana Imad Uddin Choudhury fultoli (damata barakatuhumul'aliya) - his gaddinisheen) is also a widely famous wali-e-kamil ibn wali-e-kamil, without the slightest shadow of a doubt. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|