Reply to Thread New Thread |
07-02-2012, 05:22 PM | #1 |
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...war-crime.html
Meanwhile, there is not even an article on burma on google news. Can you believe they are talking about military intervention already in mali. Funny how it takes so long in syria or burma, yet when its an shariah group who takes over in yemen or mali or somalia then armies can be prepared in a matter of no time and suddenly kuffar are interested. I wonder why they are so keen to preserve tehse sufi shrines? How many of you will side with secularist grave worshipping french slaves and how many will side with the anti imperialist monotheist upholders of shariah? its time for us all to ask ourselves where our real loyalties lay |
|
07-02-2012, 05:42 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
07-02-2012, 05:45 PM | #3 |
|
the status of a wali of Allah is that anyone who harms a wali of Allah, Allah wages war on them.
So now the kuffar are coming to the aid of Allahs walis? Lol I dont think so The prophet SAW commanded us to level graves and not take them as places of worship, these brothers in Mali are only following the beloved sunnah of the prophet SAW |
|
07-02-2012, 05:57 PM | #4 |
|
It should more like "khawarij rush to wipe out Islamic History while Muslims die in Burma." Wait till the Malian people get the upper hand against these anarchist khawarijis and thrash them left and right.
These shameless wahhabis yet go around complaining of sunni muslims being "sectarian" against wahhabis while they are the ones going around blowing up everything other than their heretical creed. Wahhabism and their pseudo shariah of khawarij are good for nothing but being crushed hard as the first Saudi state was crushed by forces from Egypt and their leaders put to death. |
|
07-02-2012, 06:04 PM | #5 |
|
these are the same people who are running the country by a secular french system. Why d you prefer secularists over upholders of Islamic law?
There isnt much they can do for burma as they'd have to get through a hell of a lot of countries to get there. Dont worry your awliyyah (western secularists) will probabily come to your aid. When islamic states are involved they usually do |
|
07-02-2012, 06:05 PM | #6 |
|
these are the same people who are running the country by a secular french system. Why d you prefer secularists over upholders of Islamic law? |
|
07-02-2012, 06:10 PM | #7 |
|
given that his name and madhab are somali im guessing he's a puntlander then. Im guessing a follower of "ahlas sunnah wal jam'ah" as they like to call themselves.
Allahu musta'aan. This site has a lot of people who are in direct opposion to the deobandis. I wonder what happened. The deobandi shaikhs and people I know in real life are not like this. There are some really good people on this forum (deobandis) but they seem to have disappeared or got annoyed with the fitnah here sadly and let the extreme sufis take over |
|
07-02-2012, 06:11 PM | #8 |
|
Neither are your khawarij law somehow valid in Islam. Your "secular law" strawman will work among fools. Set up your khawarij state in najd. Muslims of Mali will do what the Muslims of Mali want and by their own methodology to revive Islam. The najdi character of this anarchist bandits is not coincidence. The leader of this ssalafi group had found refuge in Saudi and from there associated with some najdi kharjites.
Funny is the state of those Turaeg nationalist idiots who taught salafis are nice product to ally with and now they taste bitterness after salafis are attacking their own. The end is predictable. The Turaeg would fight salafis and collateral damage and then disperese and join a larger Malian force with supprt from all Muslims and beyond and send a force to put the najdis in graves. |
|
07-02-2012, 06:16 PM | #10 |
|
warea sorry to be the bearer of bad news:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18670175 I know this type of thing will be deeply upsetting for you more info here: http://icasualties.org/OEF/index.aspx |
|
07-02-2012, 06:17 PM | #11 |
|
oh and warea, just in case you wish to pay your respects:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national...hamir-1.448258 |
|
07-02-2012, 06:33 PM | #12 |
|
oh and warea, just in case you wish to pay your respects: |
|
07-02-2012, 06:38 PM | #13 |
|
...come ON Abu Fatimah, I know you have better things to do with your time than this. Cut it out. He will literally never do anything aside from re-state his earlier posts. And this is mockery and baiting and it's not from the Sunnah manners. the true salafis go anywhere to defend their muslim brothers and sisters. they even went all teh way to bosnia to defend them, chechnya, soviet afghanistan, they go whereever muslims are being harmed, even in places full of sufis, and teh sufis respond by villfying them and cursing them at least you can say for the mujahideen in mali now, that they may be destorying sufi shrines, but they havent laid one finger on any of their brotehrs excepted to apply the hudood on thefts, woman beating etc. They arent going round killing sufis. the blod of a muslim is more sacred than teh holy ka'bah |
|
07-02-2012, 11:20 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 12:48 AM | #15 |
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 12:55 AM | #16 |
|
what are you going on about!! The kuffar is playing the game!! They hate sufis as much as they hate others. |
|
07-03-2012, 01:16 AM | #17 |
|
All this 'kuffar rush' reminds me of Buddhas of Bamiyan (not equating Malian bros with budhists of course), always there for duniawy shaytani things but careless about plight of living muslims.
Bro ive seen a change in your profile, if you don't mind can you explain? Just joking.. I initiated a thread (which disappeared) in the Comments/Suggestions forums requesting the madhhab displaying be disabled because it is un-useful for every member to state the madhhab in the profile while commenting on general threads; imho it should be only viewable when we ask/answer a fiqhi question. Otherwise I feel it is confusing for lay people as well as converts who are already much confused. But is there someone here to listen what I say ? |
|
07-03-2012, 01:37 AM | #19 |
|
how do you know al shabab destoryed shrines then? How do I know what you say is accurate and what others say is "lies"? but its not just al-Shabab it has happened in quite a lot of Africa now |
|
07-03-2012, 02:07 AM | #20 |
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...war-crime.html Today: Telegraph (known right wing establishment press) Yesterday: Washington Post (known pro zionist establisment press) Day Before: AP (known distributor of Information for establishment press) Notice the dialectical agenda here. To Pit you in two camps. Either with us or against us ! Ether you are with the 1) "French grave worshippers" (the muslims he branded mushrik yesterday) or you are with the 2) "anti imperiest" monothesitc holders of shariah (sponsored by guess who ?) HENCE the dialectic ALWAYS supports the MOST destabalising path of the two dualities !! Another example: 1.In Syria, you are either with with the Allawites kuffar 2. of the US and UK intervention (clothed as the Sunnis) Who (muslim) wants to be with the ALAWITES ? SO you are FORCED to side with the Western destabalizers This guy is being played and he doesnt even know it. Avoid this guy like the plague !! He will say "Filthy Russian Dogs" (yesterday) but wont say "filthy Western Intervention" in the destablisation of Syria over the last year (refuses to denounce the UK and US interventions) HE IS BEING PLAYED !! TOTALLY !! He mentions Burma and Syria ? But wont mention Afghanistan and Iraq in the context of Burma and Syria? Totally being manipulated by the zionist media !! They frame his rhetoric, and he spews it out as FACTS !! This guys loyalites lie with using western media to frame the ignorant muslims reference, of which he is a Tool For. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|