LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-21-2012, 01:39 PM   #1
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default Personal Preference
This was a cigarette brand launched in India in late seventies or early eighties - not being a smoker yours truly does not know the exact date. The cigarette company had invited suggestions for the brand name in a competition and the man whose proposal was accepted was give a refrigerator, a TV, a Maruti car and rupees hundred thousand in cash. This type of jackpot was not the order of the day - that came much later. Decades later. Yours truly happened to meet the nephew of the winner and that is how this old tidbit became known and got struck in the memory. Yours truly does not know whether the brand names survives today or not but that will not be relevant for the rest of the argument.

That the tobacco company wanted to make money, as they have done for a long times and continue to do so even today, is no brainier. This is some thing that should be clear to all. There is nothing in Shariah against making money as long as it is through halaal way and this business of money making does not make you oblivious of your other duties, especially hereafter.

It is something else that should catch our attention and exercise our concerns. It is the psychological trick that is worth focusing upon.

For the record it should be mentioned that Scholars of Islam have advised against using psychological tricks to invite people to Islam.

So what was it that the tobacco company was using?
It is there in the name.

This reminds one of the original tobacco company trick to entice US women folk to smoke publicly.

The story begins with US President Woodrow Wilson's announcement to enter Second World War against Germany - to restore democracy. Sigmund Freud's nephew, let us call him Dr B, was in the advisory team to the President and the task was to make the President acceptable to the European people. The decision was to present the President as liberator of Europe and the President toured the Europe with speeches to the same effect. It worked like a charm and the rest is history. World War II was won and people like Dr B wondered whether the war time trick can be used in peace time. To generate business. Women in the US did not smoke publicly and the tobacco companies thought of doubling their clientele by incorporating women. Or the psychologist Dr B thought so. Action plan? Some strikingly beautiful women were chosen to stage a dramatic event at the periphery of a huge public demonstration. They will march with placards and after a short walk will collectively light cigarettes publicly in front of the well tipped press. And that is how it was done. Press lapped it up and the US women came to know about the torches of freedom, the cigarette.

Dr B and company asserted, of course there was liberal advice from Sigmund Freud himself, that you can incite people to behave irrationally if it caters to their hidden desires. Women's hidden desire to break loose of male control, the so called women's liberation, was used to double the cigarette market.

So what has it got to do with the cigarette brand in question?
It is, as we said earlier, in the name. Personal Preference. Do you get it? It is my personal preference to smoke. I am some one who has a preference. I am some body. Do not think of me as no body. I am a man of preference.

This is a heady thing. It is intoxicating. And it does not need Freud to figure out that a person drunk on personal glory is ready to indulge in irrational behaviour.

Yours truly read a book on popular psychology called The Road Less Traveled by a very successful psychologist named L. Scott Peck. This is amongst cult books of modern times like How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie Amy and Thomas Haris's book on transactional analysis called I'm OK, You Are OK. Late Scott Peck, curiously, had got his inspiration from Islamic mysticism and he did use it in this book but in his own way. We shall talk of that at some other time but the sore thumb statement goes some thing like this: The ultimate reason for restoration of mental health is the assertion that you are some thing. Now what was that again? It is strange that he should get the opposite of what mystics of Islam teach - there are diverse mystics in Islam but there are some points on which there is no diversion at all and self-annihilation (called Fana Fillah) is one of those points where all mystics converge. You have to annihilate your ego in Lord Most High - you have to completely submit to Him. To think that you are somebody, even if it is in the least bit is completely contrary to the spirit of mysticism. This is a concept easy to understand but difficult to accept. Annihilation of ego is not trivial. This is the main business in Islamic mysticism.

Two points need squaring here. Dr B mentioned something about the hidden desire to be free or to revolt on part of women. Or some thing to that effect. Yours truly had it from a westernized female psychologist, a Christian, that even modern women desire to be owned by man. In fact one striking case of conversion to Islam in India was of a very famous female writer in English from Kerala called Kamala Das. She was amongst those writers who wrote about female feelings and sensibilities so audaciously that the the people who were shocked were left with no choice but only to keep quite. So what was her reason for conversion so late in life after fame had come to her and did not leave?

Well she wanted to be owned and protected by her Muslim husband. Simple.
Thank you Kamala Suraiya - as she was known later. Her case was devastating to majority community in India she did face ire of the uncouth elements but they could do little in face of the brutal onslaught of truth.

Second point to square is that it might give an impression that we have built up a mansion on few isolated examples. That is not the case. This was the time, when the said cigarette brand was launched, when India was coming out of the old freedom movement mentality, for it was already free, and was looking for new ideologies. And what ideology did they find? Well western ideology of so called freedom and liberalism as only post renaissance Europe could offer.

A little later a magazine called India Today was launched that periodically carried such articles that portrayed the above type of irrational behaviour as fait accompli. It means that they were giving out the message that our society is already like that and there is nothing wrong it with it and this is the order of the day, either ride the band wagon or be ready to be left behind. There was one article about teenagers breaking free of parental bondage. "Babes are an expansive lot", declared a Madras boy who was earning money to spend on girls by working in a garments shop. Slightly later girls were portrayed saying that their hall mark is that they will not depend on a father of a brother for their decisions. And so on.
Poeetiol is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 04:31 PM   #2
Klavalala

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
The story begins with US President Lindon B. Johnson's announcement to enter Second World War against Germany.
Huh?
Klavalala is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 06:15 PM   #3
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
Huh?
I took it from the documentary posted by brother iSoK in a recent thread. Please do tell the correct sequence of events - I would like to get the order of the events right.
Poeetiol is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 06:22 PM   #4
Klavalala

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
LBJ was US president from 63-69, and was involved in the Vietnam War. FDR was president during WWII. I don't know about the rest of the story with Freuds nephew and such.
Klavalala is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 06:24 PM   #5
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
LBJ was US president from 63-69, and was involved in the Vietnam War. FDR was president during WWII. I don't know about the rest of the story with Freuds nephew and such.
I'll post the link to the documentary, it is long one but the incident is there is the beginning itself.

PS: Link
If the video opens forwarded then the incident is before that point.
Poeetiol is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 08:23 PM   #6
TeftyJokip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
358
Senior Member
Default

Very informational post brother.
BUT i failed to understand the moral of the story.

TeftyJokip is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 10:08 PM   #7
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default

Very informational post brother.
BUT i failed to understand the moral of the story.


Thanks for asking akhi - you know I shall not know whether I have made sense or not unless some one gives the feedback.

Firstly I have to sort out the technical matter raised by brother NNoor but your question can be still answered.

Either Hazrat Abu Bakr (RA) or Hazrat Umar (RA) was having a meal together with his son (RA). They were both eating from the same bowl. The vegetable was gourd. Gourd was beloved Prophet (PBUH)'s favourite vegetable. Young Companion (RA) was avoiding the gourd pieces and soaking his bread in the soup only before putting the morsel in mouth. Father asked him the reason. The son said that he does not like gourd. That is when father got infuriated. I suppose it should be Hazrat Abu Bakr (RA) because I can not imagine the scene if the anger proceeds from Hazrat Umar (RA). But any way the senior Companion (RA) said, "Are you still looking for personal preferences after what Rasoolallah (RA) wants?" This is Islam.

I have presented this deception of personal preferences by taking a detour to modern west because that where we are getting some of our Deen from, na'oodhubillah.

If it makes sense then fine otherwise please do ask further questions.
Poeetiol is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 10:15 PM   #8
Poeetiol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
Lindon B. Johnson --> Woodrow Wilson.
Poeetiol is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 10:25 PM   #9
craditc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Interesting read..
craditc is offline


Old 06-21-2012, 10:26 PM   #10
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
It is, as we said earlier, in the name. Personal Preference. Do you get it? It is my personal preference to smoke. I am some one who has a preference. I am some body. Do not think of me as no body. I am a man of preference.
This incident popularised women smoking, before that, only men smoked en masse, as you said. So the historical roots of women smoking, as you say was a staged incident of supposed felmale liberation

Women's hidden desire to break loose of male control, the so called women's liberation, was used to double the cigarette market. Id say the reverse causation applies. The cigarette was used to further the womens liberation cause, and to inculcate, increase, the desire for women to break loose of male control. It was NOT a latent desire that was exploited, the desire was created, using film, music, tv, film stars and cigarettes.

Dr. B was also involved in fluridating water, lead in petrol, asbestos in buildings, additives in drinks, subliminal messages in films and music, and probably a whole host of other "beneficial" improvements for mankind .. lol

The moral of the story, is that some percived "normal" habits or "things" have sinister, staged manufactured roots.

Apply this story to everything in your life, as in look into the roots of things, and you may start to appreciate the halal and haraam

Appreciate the halal and haram and you will more easily extinguish your own ego

Extinguish your own self, your desire for leadership and position, and you will be closer to Allah.

Get closer to Allah you will get attain paradise and eternal success.

Jazakallah for the story bro !
Cucoulkrory is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity