Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
This leads me to another interesting question, what is the official position of Deoband 'ulema on salafi's? Are they classed as devient? Because I'm getting mixed messages. Many of the people on this forum have fun bashing salafi's, but when I read the article on the Deoband website by mufti taqi usmani, he seemed quite respectful of salafi's. So there seems to be a problem somewhere, we have a person who many of the people on this forum consider to be a devient anthromorphist leading deobandi's in Salah. It don't make sense to me. When the likes of Mufti Taqi Usmani says they are not devient, why do Deobandi's say they are. confusion 100% Yeah brother. They are ignorance-driven people. May Allah give them Hidayya' |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
If that is the case how come they invited him to Deoband to lead them in Salah? and what are we meant to do when we go on Hajj? ![]() The fatwa of the madhab is that if you know for certain that someone holds bida' beliefs like those who disparage the Sahaba or those who affirm a direction for Allah Ta'ala, then it is makruh tahrimi. However if there is no other jama'ah then it is better to pray with the jama'ah than to pray alone, therefore you have when in hAjj it would be okay to perform salah even if the Imam does hold these beliefs, and Allah knows best. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Assalamu alaykum
Alhamdulillah thats a huge jamat there! is there normally a big jamat like this? |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
![]() Alhamdulillah, that the affairs of this Ummah are not in the hands of immature Muslims like us. The scholars don't brand eachother as quick as we do on internet forums. The concept of unity seems to be a very difficult one in our times to grasp. We are always under the impression, that when the elders are telling us to be more tolerant and united, that we're supposed to deny any differences and accept wrongs. But what they are actually implying is that we remain tolerant and united DESPITE these differences. May Allah ta'ala give us the tawfiq for that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
![]() Just noticed this bit while I was skimming through: To commence, I would like to tell the participants in this conference that it would please me a lot if I could take part in this noble conference attended by many prominent scholars to share the celebration of the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of Al-Jami`ah Al-Islamiyyah (Islamic university). Does anyone else find this just slightly ironic....? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
![]() Akhi here is the urdu translation of the speech of Shaykh Abdur-Rehman Al-Sudais DB http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2_iohd2XIA |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
Why do we adopt such a reductionist approach to these things. I once asked a Deoband Affiate scholar from SA about their dissagreement with Saudi Scholars. He said our disagreement is a scholastic one and there is a good relation between saudi scholars and US. These disagreement has nothing to do with laymen.
Allahualam
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
![]() It has to be made clear to them that giving Ta'wil (allegorical interpretation) to Ayahs (Qur'anic verses) and Hadith on the Attributes of Allah as was done by some sects that ascribed themselves to Islam, is an impermissible attitude that may neither be followed nor acknowledged. Rather, people have to be made aware of the invalidity of such a trend and the fact that it opposes the texts of the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Ijma` (consensus of scholars) of Salaf (righteous predecessors). Deobandis actually acknowledged this tripe? He's supposed to be celebrating the bithday of the madrassa, but he's taking the opportunity to spew his propaganda... Show of what unity??? |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Why do we adopt such a reductionist approach to these things. I once asked a Deoband Affiate scholar from SA about their dissagreement with Saudi Scholars. He said our disagreement is a scholastic one and there is a good relation between saudi scholars and US. These disagreement has nothing to do with laymen. My assessment is that the "taqleed" war is helping nobody and both the parties are equally wrong in their extremist stances. Unlike the Saudi Salafis whose main focus is Aqeedah and the rejection of Bidaa'hs etc, the pakistani Salafis have based their case on "Taqleed" which i think is not a very appropriate approach. Similarly , no sane person can ignore the following deeds of Ulema-e-deoband 1. Making a very good block against the Bidaati Barelvis whose darkness of ignorance would have taken over the whole sub-continent in the absence of Deobandi Ulema 2.Their struggle against Qadyaniat is unmatched. The 1974 declaration against Qadyanis was only possible with the endeavors of Mufti Mehmood ra , Maulana Ata Ullah Shah Bukhari ra etc. 3.The establishment of a vibrant and multi-dimensional block against the Rafidhis. 4.The establishment of a very disciplined Madrassah system and Tablighi Jamaa't. 5.Taking part as a major party in Afghan Jihaad. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
![]() We need to stop underestimating the unity of the Ummah. And if anyone had stood up and shouted something stupid, he would have been beaten to a pulp. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
Shaykh Ehsan Elahi Zaheer ra was not an anti-deoband. He can be called the pioneer of Salafi Dawaa'h in pakistan. I never heard him showing any disrespect but since his Shahadat, when the matters came into the hands of Talib Ur rehman and co. they worsened the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
sh.zahir was the pilar of the building, which cant be seen. sh, talib and others are its windows and door which are based upon the pillar. Read this to know how flexible shaykh Ehsan Elahi Zaheer ra was off the mic http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...3-2-2004_pg3_6 PS. The on mic bitterness of Shaykh Ehsan Elahi ra escalated since the establishment of "Sawad e Azam". He mentions it in his speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp8bQ...eature=related |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
![]() ![]() earlier post, ![]() I find it shocking no 1 in the conference stood up and started shouting "you anthromorphist Salafi, don't tell us about your devient aqeedah". |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
Ah, you're the guy who I was referring to in my earlier post ![]() That's not the point akhi, he's the one basically addressing the deobandis present there and telling them their aqeedah is baatil... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Am I the only one noticing a condescending and lecturing tone in the speech?
Something which make you think its preparation on the lines of: "Ok, where are we going to give this speech? In India? Where a lot of bid'ah takes place and those deviants follow the Maturidi deviant 'Aqidah? Let's focus on these points and give them some mild Salafi da'wah". My impression is that the scholars in the Indo-Pak seem very cautious on regards of the Arab Salafis and prefer to keep a low profile with their scholars and not engage in discussions; but this may sometimes give the impression of some sort of inferiority complex toward the "Arab scholars" taking one to stay silent instead of freely and openly expressing one's views. A bit of the same reason for which the more "sober" Riyad as-Salihin in used for Arab Tablighis instead of Fada'il-e-A'mal, not to "scare" them away, while a more confident attitude may be seen to have bigger effects in the Da'wah amongst Arabs. Sad to see that the respect and silence offered by many Deobandis isn't exchanged back but with declaration of deviancy of our Minhaj from many Salafi scholars. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|